A community psychology of object meanings: Identity negotiation during disaster recovery

Stacey Menzel Baker, Ronald Paul Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What do material goods intended for personal consumption mean to community? We use the extreme example of natural disaster recovery in a community to explore this question. Our work describes how members make sense of material objects that transition from private to public possessions (damaged goods) and public to private possessions (donated goods). By blending consumer and community psychology perspectives with our narratives, we employ a three-dimensional framework for analyzing object meanings: (1) material objects as agents of communitas (a shared sense of "we"), (2) material objects as agents of individualism (a focus on "me"), and (3) material objects as agents of opposition (the "we" that speaks for "me" and "us" versus "them"). This theoretical frame allows us to show how different conceptions of identity lead to conflicting meanings of objects within community, and to explain how and why object meanings shift as objects move across time and space from private to public and from scarcity to abundance. We also provide implications for coping with disasters that consider collective and individual identities as well as oppositional stances in between.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-287
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Consumer Psychology
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Negotiating
Disasters
Psychology
Disaster recovery

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology
  • Marketing

Cite this

A community psychology of object meanings : Identity negotiation during disaster recovery. / Menzel Baker, Stacey; Hill, Ronald Paul.

In: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 23, No. 3, 07.2013, p. 275-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8f63b16c2c80457496c773fc88489450,
title = "A community psychology of object meanings: Identity negotiation during disaster recovery",
abstract = "What do material goods intended for personal consumption mean to community? We use the extreme example of natural disaster recovery in a community to explore this question. Our work describes how members make sense of material objects that transition from private to public possessions (damaged goods) and public to private possessions (donated goods). By blending consumer and community psychology perspectives with our narratives, we employ a three-dimensional framework for analyzing object meanings: (1) material objects as agents of communitas (a shared sense of {"}we{"}), (2) material objects as agents of individualism (a focus on {"}me{"}), and (3) material objects as agents of opposition (the {"}we{"} that speaks for {"}me{"} and {"}us{"} versus {"}them{"}). This theoretical frame allows us to show how different conceptions of identity lead to conflicting meanings of objects within community, and to explain how and why object meanings shift as objects move across time and space from private to public and from scarcity to abundance. We also provide implications for coping with disasters that consider collective and individual identities as well as oppositional stances in between.",
author = "{Menzel Baker}, Stacey and Hill, {Ronald Paul}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcps.2013.01.007",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "275--287",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Psychology",
issn = "1057-7408",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A community psychology of object meanings

T2 - Identity negotiation during disaster recovery

AU - Menzel Baker, Stacey

AU - Hill, Ronald Paul

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - What do material goods intended for personal consumption mean to community? We use the extreme example of natural disaster recovery in a community to explore this question. Our work describes how members make sense of material objects that transition from private to public possessions (damaged goods) and public to private possessions (donated goods). By blending consumer and community psychology perspectives with our narratives, we employ a three-dimensional framework for analyzing object meanings: (1) material objects as agents of communitas (a shared sense of "we"), (2) material objects as agents of individualism (a focus on "me"), and (3) material objects as agents of opposition (the "we" that speaks for "me" and "us" versus "them"). This theoretical frame allows us to show how different conceptions of identity lead to conflicting meanings of objects within community, and to explain how and why object meanings shift as objects move across time and space from private to public and from scarcity to abundance. We also provide implications for coping with disasters that consider collective and individual identities as well as oppositional stances in between.

AB - What do material goods intended for personal consumption mean to community? We use the extreme example of natural disaster recovery in a community to explore this question. Our work describes how members make sense of material objects that transition from private to public possessions (damaged goods) and public to private possessions (donated goods). By blending consumer and community psychology perspectives with our narratives, we employ a three-dimensional framework for analyzing object meanings: (1) material objects as agents of communitas (a shared sense of "we"), (2) material objects as agents of individualism (a focus on "me"), and (3) material objects as agents of opposition (the "we" that speaks for "me" and "us" versus "them"). This theoretical frame allows us to show how different conceptions of identity lead to conflicting meanings of objects within community, and to explain how and why object meanings shift as objects move across time and space from private to public and from scarcity to abundance. We also provide implications for coping with disasters that consider collective and individual identities as well as oppositional stances in between.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878901585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878901585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcps.2013.01.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jcps.2013.01.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84878901585

VL - 23

SP - 275

EP - 287

JO - Journal of Consumer Psychology

JF - Journal of Consumer Psychology

SN - 1057-7408

IS - 3

ER -