Abstract
Background: The primary aim of this randomized, controlled, clinical investigation was to evaluate the differences in clinical parameters of root coverage procedures utilizing coronally advanced flaps (CAF) with and without enamel matrix derivative (EMD). Another aim was to evaluate if EMD can influence keratinization of tissues utilizing these procedures. Methods: Fifty-eight contralateral sites in 17 patients with ≥2 mm of Miller Class I, II, and III buccal marginal tissue recession were treated. Test sites received CAF plus EMD while control sites were treated with CAF only, with each patient serving as his own control. Patients were followed for 3 and 6 months. All data were analyzed using the method of generalized estimating equations. A P value
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 949-956 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Periodontology |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Dentistry(all)
Cite this
A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix deriative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession. / Cueva, Marco A.; Boltchi, Farhard E.; Hallmon, William W.; Nunn, Martha E.; Rivera-Hidalgo, Francisco; Rees, Terry.
In: Journal of Periodontology, Vol. 75, No. 7, 07.2004, p. 949-956.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix deriative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession
AU - Cueva, Marco A.
AU - Boltchi, Farhard E.
AU - Hallmon, William W.
AU - Nunn, Martha E.
AU - Rivera-Hidalgo, Francisco
AU - Rees, Terry
PY - 2004/7
Y1 - 2004/7
N2 - Background: The primary aim of this randomized, controlled, clinical investigation was to evaluate the differences in clinical parameters of root coverage procedures utilizing coronally advanced flaps (CAF) with and without enamel matrix derivative (EMD). Another aim was to evaluate if EMD can influence keratinization of tissues utilizing these procedures. Methods: Fifty-eight contralateral sites in 17 patients with ≥2 mm of Miller Class I, II, and III buccal marginal tissue recession were treated. Test sites received CAF plus EMD while control sites were treated with CAF only, with each patient serving as his own control. Patients were followed for 3 and 6 months. All data were analyzed using the method of generalized estimating equations. A P value
AB - Background: The primary aim of this randomized, controlled, clinical investigation was to evaluate the differences in clinical parameters of root coverage procedures utilizing coronally advanced flaps (CAF) with and without enamel matrix derivative (EMD). Another aim was to evaluate if EMD can influence keratinization of tissues utilizing these procedures. Methods: Fifty-eight contralateral sites in 17 patients with ≥2 mm of Miller Class I, II, and III buccal marginal tissue recession were treated. Test sites received CAF plus EMD while control sites were treated with CAF only, with each patient serving as his own control. Patients were followed for 3 and 6 months. All data were analyzed using the method of generalized estimating equations. A P value
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4444372797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4444372797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1902/jop.2004.75.7.949
DO - 10.1902/jop.2004.75.7.949
M3 - Article
C2 - 15341352
AN - SCOPUS:4444372797
VL - 75
SP - 949
EP - 956
JO - Journal of Periodontology
JF - Journal of Periodontology
SN - 0022-3492
IS - 7
ER -