A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Critics attack normative ethical stakeholder theory for failing to recognize the special moral status of shareholders that justifies the fiduciary duties owed to them at law by managers. Stakeholder theorists reply that there is nothing morally significant about shareholders that can underwrite those fiduciary duties. I advance an argument that seeks to demonstrate both the special moral status of shareholders in a firm and the concomitant moral inadequacy of stakeholder theory. I argue that (i) if some relations morally require fiduciary duties, and (ii) the shareholder-manager relation possesses the features that make fiduciary duties morally necessary to those relations, then (iii) stakeholder theory is morally lacking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalBusiness Ethics Quarterly
Volume13
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Fiduciary duty
Shareholders
Stakeholder theory
Stakeholder Theory
Managers
Moral Status
Stakeholders
Attack
Theorists

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory. / Marcoux, Alexei.

In: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2003, p. 1-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e35279ad69d843d9b0266b1ee7cde2f2,
title = "A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory",
abstract = "Critics attack normative ethical stakeholder theory for failing to recognize the special moral status of shareholders that justifies the fiduciary duties owed to them at law by managers. Stakeholder theorists reply that there is nothing morally significant about shareholders that can underwrite those fiduciary duties. I advance an argument that seeks to demonstrate both the special moral status of shareholders in a firm and the concomitant moral inadequacy of stakeholder theory. I argue that (i) if some relations morally require fiduciary duties, and (ii) the shareholder-manager relation possesses the features that make fiduciary duties morally necessary to those relations, then (iii) stakeholder theory is morally lacking.",
author = "Alexei Marcoux",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--24",
journal = "Business Ethics Quarterly",
issn = "1052-150X",
publisher = "Philosophy Documentation Center",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory

AU - Marcoux, Alexei

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Critics attack normative ethical stakeholder theory for failing to recognize the special moral status of shareholders that justifies the fiduciary duties owed to them at law by managers. Stakeholder theorists reply that there is nothing morally significant about shareholders that can underwrite those fiduciary duties. I advance an argument that seeks to demonstrate both the special moral status of shareholders in a firm and the concomitant moral inadequacy of stakeholder theory. I argue that (i) if some relations morally require fiduciary duties, and (ii) the shareholder-manager relation possesses the features that make fiduciary duties morally necessary to those relations, then (iii) stakeholder theory is morally lacking.

AB - Critics attack normative ethical stakeholder theory for failing to recognize the special moral status of shareholders that justifies the fiduciary duties owed to them at law by managers. Stakeholder theorists reply that there is nothing morally significant about shareholders that can underwrite those fiduciary duties. I advance an argument that seeks to demonstrate both the special moral status of shareholders in a firm and the concomitant moral inadequacy of stakeholder theory. I argue that (i) if some relations morally require fiduciary duties, and (ii) the shareholder-manager relation possesses the features that make fiduciary duties morally necessary to those relations, then (iii) stakeholder theory is morally lacking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037215853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037215853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 13

SP - 1

EP - 24

JO - Business Ethics Quarterly

JF - Business Ethics Quarterly

SN - 1052-150X

IS - 1

ER -