A multi-group analysis of structural invariance: An illustration using the technology acceptance model

Xiaodong Deng, William J. Doll, Anthony Hendrickson, Joseph A. Scazzero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Selecting the appropriate mix of functional and/or interface characteristics to achieve user acceptance has proven to be a more challenging and difficult decision than expected. While numerous studies have shown that the technology acceptance model (TAM) is useful for predicting acceptance, estimates of its structural weights are not consistent across studies. Using initial exposure data from 742 users of office suite applications (i.e., spreadsheet, database, word processing, and graphics), our research illustrated the use of multi-group analysis of structural invariance (MASI) to test differences in structural weights across population subgroups for latent variables in TAM. We argue that, for large sample studies containing latent variables, MASI may be a more appropriate test of differences for structural weights/regression coefficients than analysis of covariance. The managerial implications of the results in setting functionality and interface goals and allocating resources to continued development efforts are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)745-759
Number of pages15
JournalInformation and Management
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Invariance
Word processing
Spreadsheets
Multi-group analysis
Technology acceptance model
Latent variables

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management

Cite this

A multi-group analysis of structural invariance : An illustration using the technology acceptance model. / Deng, Xiaodong; Doll, William J.; Hendrickson, Anthony; Scazzero, Joseph A.

In: Information and Management, Vol. 42, No. 5, 07.2005, p. 745-759.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8ab58d8e5c86441ea23327ca14a590de,
title = "A multi-group analysis of structural invariance: An illustration using the technology acceptance model",
abstract = "Selecting the appropriate mix of functional and/or interface characteristics to achieve user acceptance has proven to be a more challenging and difficult decision than expected. While numerous studies have shown that the technology acceptance model (TAM) is useful for predicting acceptance, estimates of its structural weights are not consistent across studies. Using initial exposure data from 742 users of office suite applications (i.e., spreadsheet, database, word processing, and graphics), our research illustrated the use of multi-group analysis of structural invariance (MASI) to test differences in structural weights across population subgroups for latent variables in TAM. We argue that, for large sample studies containing latent variables, MASI may be a more appropriate test of differences for structural weights/regression coefficients than analysis of covariance. The managerial implications of the results in setting functionality and interface goals and allocating resources to continued development efforts are discussed.",
author = "Xiaodong Deng and Doll, {William J.} and Anthony Hendrickson and Scazzero, {Joseph A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.im.2004.08.001",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "745--759",
journal = "Information and Management",
issn = "0378-7206",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multi-group analysis of structural invariance

T2 - An illustration using the technology acceptance model

AU - Deng, Xiaodong

AU - Doll, William J.

AU - Hendrickson, Anthony

AU - Scazzero, Joseph A.

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Selecting the appropriate mix of functional and/or interface characteristics to achieve user acceptance has proven to be a more challenging and difficult decision than expected. While numerous studies have shown that the technology acceptance model (TAM) is useful for predicting acceptance, estimates of its structural weights are not consistent across studies. Using initial exposure data from 742 users of office suite applications (i.e., spreadsheet, database, word processing, and graphics), our research illustrated the use of multi-group analysis of structural invariance (MASI) to test differences in structural weights across population subgroups for latent variables in TAM. We argue that, for large sample studies containing latent variables, MASI may be a more appropriate test of differences for structural weights/regression coefficients than analysis of covariance. The managerial implications of the results in setting functionality and interface goals and allocating resources to continued development efforts are discussed.

AB - Selecting the appropriate mix of functional and/or interface characteristics to achieve user acceptance has proven to be a more challenging and difficult decision than expected. While numerous studies have shown that the technology acceptance model (TAM) is useful for predicting acceptance, estimates of its structural weights are not consistent across studies. Using initial exposure data from 742 users of office suite applications (i.e., spreadsheet, database, word processing, and graphics), our research illustrated the use of multi-group analysis of structural invariance (MASI) to test differences in structural weights across population subgroups for latent variables in TAM. We argue that, for large sample studies containing latent variables, MASI may be a more appropriate test of differences for structural weights/regression coefficients than analysis of covariance. The managerial implications of the results in setting functionality and interface goals and allocating resources to continued development efforts are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18544364038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18544364038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.im.2004.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.im.2004.08.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:18544364038

VL - 42

SP - 745

EP - 759

JO - Information and Management

JF - Information and Management

SN - 0378-7206

IS - 5

ER -