A pluralist conception of play

Randolph M. Feezell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The philosophical and scientific literature on play is extensive and the approaches to the study, description, and explanation of play are diverse. In this paper I intend to provide an overview of approaches to play. My interest is in describing the most fundamental categories in terms of which play is characterized, explained, and evaluated. Insofar as these categories attempt to describe what kind of reality we are talking about when we make claims about play, I hope to clarify the metaphysics of play. Once this categorical scheme is made clear, we will be in a better position to evaluate the task of definition, claims about the relation of sport and play, and assertions about the significance of play. First, I place the discussion in the context of Bernard Suits's account of play and some other recent approaches to play. Next, I distinguish the following approaches to play: (a) play as behavior or activity; (b) play as motive, attitude, or state of mind; (c) play as form or structure; (d) play as meaningful experience; (e) play as an ontologically distinctive phenomenon. There is a natural progression in the way the analysis unfolds. In the final section I argue that my analysis generates a pluralist, nonreductive account of play.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147-165
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of the Philosophy of Sport
Volume37
Issue number2
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Metaphysics
Literature
Sports
metaphysics
technical literature
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Feezell, R. M. (2010). A pluralist conception of play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 37(2), 147-165.

A pluralist conception of play. / Feezell, Randolph M.

In: Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, Vol. 37, No. 2, 10.2010, p. 147-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Feezell, RM 2010, 'A pluralist conception of play', Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 147-165.
Feezell, Randolph M. / A pluralist conception of play. In: Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 2010 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 147-165.
@article{0636ba895b9345fca97eb67604e6bb56,
title = "A pluralist conception of play",
abstract = "The philosophical and scientific literature on play is extensive and the approaches to the study, description, and explanation of play are diverse. In this paper I intend to provide an overview of approaches to play. My interest is in describing the most fundamental categories in terms of which play is characterized, explained, and evaluated. Insofar as these categories attempt to describe what kind of reality we are talking about when we make claims about play, I hope to clarify the metaphysics of play. Once this categorical scheme is made clear, we will be in a better position to evaluate the task of definition, claims about the relation of sport and play, and assertions about the significance of play. First, I place the discussion in the context of Bernard Suits's account of play and some other recent approaches to play. Next, I distinguish the following approaches to play: (a) play as behavior or activity; (b) play as motive, attitude, or state of mind; (c) play as form or structure; (d) play as meaningful experience; (e) play as an ontologically distinctive phenomenon. There is a natural progression in the way the analysis unfolds. In the final section I argue that my analysis generates a pluralist, nonreductive account of play.",
author = "Feezell, {Randolph M.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "147--165",
journal = "Journal of the Philosophy of Sport",
issn = "0094-8705",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pluralist conception of play

AU - Feezell, Randolph M.

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - The philosophical and scientific literature on play is extensive and the approaches to the study, description, and explanation of play are diverse. In this paper I intend to provide an overview of approaches to play. My interest is in describing the most fundamental categories in terms of which play is characterized, explained, and evaluated. Insofar as these categories attempt to describe what kind of reality we are talking about when we make claims about play, I hope to clarify the metaphysics of play. Once this categorical scheme is made clear, we will be in a better position to evaluate the task of definition, claims about the relation of sport and play, and assertions about the significance of play. First, I place the discussion in the context of Bernard Suits's account of play and some other recent approaches to play. Next, I distinguish the following approaches to play: (a) play as behavior or activity; (b) play as motive, attitude, or state of mind; (c) play as form or structure; (d) play as meaningful experience; (e) play as an ontologically distinctive phenomenon. There is a natural progression in the way the analysis unfolds. In the final section I argue that my analysis generates a pluralist, nonreductive account of play.

AB - The philosophical and scientific literature on play is extensive and the approaches to the study, description, and explanation of play are diverse. In this paper I intend to provide an overview of approaches to play. My interest is in describing the most fundamental categories in terms of which play is characterized, explained, and evaluated. Insofar as these categories attempt to describe what kind of reality we are talking about when we make claims about play, I hope to clarify the metaphysics of play. Once this categorical scheme is made clear, we will be in a better position to evaluate the task of definition, claims about the relation of sport and play, and assertions about the significance of play. First, I place the discussion in the context of Bernard Suits's account of play and some other recent approaches to play. Next, I distinguish the following approaches to play: (a) play as behavior or activity; (b) play as motive, attitude, or state of mind; (c) play as form or structure; (d) play as meaningful experience; (e) play as an ontologically distinctive phenomenon. There is a natural progression in the way the analysis unfolds. In the final section I argue that my analysis generates a pluralist, nonreductive account of play.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78951480259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78951480259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 147

EP - 165

JO - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport

JF - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport

SN - 0094-8705

IS - 2

ER -