Abstract
Scholars in both Austrian Economics and the Public Choice tradition intuitively understand that intervention often creates redistribution from lower income households to the middle class, but there has been little systematic inquiry into the distributional consequences of interventionism. This paper systematically applies Austrian insights to the dispersed costs side of the analysis of intervention to offer a better sense of how large those costs may be and who tends to bear them. An emergent literature on the regressive effects of regulation highlights those distributional consequences both from a theoretical and an empirical perspective.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-8 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Review of Austrian Economics |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - Jul 2 2018 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
Cite this
A process perspective on regulation : Who bears the dispersed costs of regulation? / Thomas, Diana W.
In: Review of Austrian Economics, 02.07.2018, p. 1-8.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A process perspective on regulation
T2 - Who bears the dispersed costs of regulation?
AU - Thomas, Diana W.
PY - 2018/7/2
Y1 - 2018/7/2
N2 - Scholars in both Austrian Economics and the Public Choice tradition intuitively understand that intervention often creates redistribution from lower income households to the middle class, but there has been little systematic inquiry into the distributional consequences of interventionism. This paper systematically applies Austrian insights to the dispersed costs side of the analysis of intervention to offer a better sense of how large those costs may be and who tends to bear them. An emergent literature on the regressive effects of regulation highlights those distributional consequences both from a theoretical and an empirical perspective.
AB - Scholars in both Austrian Economics and the Public Choice tradition intuitively understand that intervention often creates redistribution from lower income households to the middle class, but there has been little systematic inquiry into the distributional consequences of interventionism. This paper systematically applies Austrian insights to the dispersed costs side of the analysis of intervention to offer a better sense of how large those costs may be and who tends to bear them. An emergent literature on the regressive effects of regulation highlights those distributional consequences both from a theoretical and an empirical perspective.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049218990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049218990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11138-018-0426-3
DO - 10.1007/s11138-018-0426-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049218990
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Review of Austrian Economics
JF - Review of Austrian Economics
SN - 0889-3047
ER -