A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds to the back

George C. Velmahos, Demetrios Demetriades, Esteban Foianini, Raymond Tatevossian, Edward E. Cornwell, Juan A. Asensio, Howard Belzberg, Thomas V. Berne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gunshot wounds to the back with retroperitoneal trajectories have been traditionally managed under the same guidelines as anterior gunshot wounds. Recent work has suggested that selective nonoperative management of anterior abdominal gunshot wounds is safe. The role of this policy in gunshot wounds to the back, where retroperitoneal organ injuries may be more difficult to detect clinically, has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: TO examine if selective nonoperative management based on clinical assessment is a safe alternative to mandatory exploration for gun-shot wounds to the back. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Large-volume level-1 university affiliated trauma center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TWO hundred and three consecutive patients with gunshot wounds to the back were managed according to a protocol during a 12-month period. Patients with hemodynamic instability or peritonitis underwent urgent operation. The rest of the patients were observed with careful serial clinical examinations. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent an emergency room thoracotomy and were excluded. Four more patients were operated upon, despite the absence of abdominal findings, because of associated spinal cord injuries (2 patients), inability to observe due to need for repair of an associated peripheral vascular injury (1 patient), and participation in another protocol of aggressive evaluation of asymptomatic patients with suspected diaphragmatic injuries (1 patient). Of the remaining 188 patients, 58 (31%) underwent laparotomy (56 therapeutic, 2 negative) and 130 (69%) were initially observed owing to negative clinical examination. Following the development of increasing abdominal tenderness, 4 of these 130 o (3%) underwent delayed explorations, which were all nontherapeutic. The sensitivity and specificity of initial clinical examination in detecting significant intraabdominal injuries were 100% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mandatory laparotomy is not necessary for gunshot wounds of the back. Clinical examination is a safe method of selecting patients for nonoperative management. An observation period of 24 hours is adequate for patients with no abdominal symptoms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)342-346
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume174
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gunshot Wounds
Wounds and Injuries
Laparotomy
Patient Participation
Trauma Centers
Vascular System Injuries
Firearms
Thoracotomy
Peritonitis
Spinal Cord Injuries
Hospital Emergency Service
Hemodynamics
Observation
Prospective Studies
Guidelines

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Velmahos, G. C., Demetriades, D., Foianini, E., Tatevossian, R., Cornwell, E. E., Asensio, J. A., ... Berne, T. V. (1997). A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds to the back. American Journal of Surgery, 174(3), 342-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00098-6

A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds to the back. / Velmahos, George C.; Demetriades, Demetrios; Foianini, Esteban; Tatevossian, Raymond; Cornwell, Edward E.; Asensio, Juan A.; Belzberg, Howard; Berne, Thomas V.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 174, No. 3, 09.1997, p. 342-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Velmahos, GC, Demetriades, D, Foianini, E, Tatevossian, R, Cornwell, EE, Asensio, JA, Belzberg, H & Berne, TV 1997, 'A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds to the back', American Journal of Surgery, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 342-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00098-6
Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Foianini E, Tatevossian R, Cornwell EE, Asensio JA et al. A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds to the back. American Journal of Surgery. 1997 Sep;174(3):342-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00098-6
Velmahos, George C. ; Demetriades, Demetrios ; Foianini, Esteban ; Tatevossian, Raymond ; Cornwell, Edward E. ; Asensio, Juan A. ; Belzberg, Howard ; Berne, Thomas V. / A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds to the back. In: American Journal of Surgery. 1997 ; Vol. 174, No. 3. pp. 342-346.
@article{2bb466fd272e4c34ac49b7c326e60feb,
title = "A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds to the back",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Gunshot wounds to the back with retroperitoneal trajectories have been traditionally managed under the same guidelines as anterior gunshot wounds. Recent work has suggested that selective nonoperative management of anterior abdominal gunshot wounds is safe. The role of this policy in gunshot wounds to the back, where retroperitoneal organ injuries may be more difficult to detect clinically, has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: TO examine if selective nonoperative management based on clinical assessment is a safe alternative to mandatory exploration for gun-shot wounds to the back. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Large-volume level-1 university affiliated trauma center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TWO hundred and three consecutive patients with gunshot wounds to the back were managed according to a protocol during a 12-month period. Patients with hemodynamic instability or peritonitis underwent urgent operation. The rest of the patients were observed with careful serial clinical examinations. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent an emergency room thoracotomy and were excluded. Four more patients were operated upon, despite the absence of abdominal findings, because of associated spinal cord injuries (2 patients), inability to observe due to need for repair of an associated peripheral vascular injury (1 patient), and participation in another protocol of aggressive evaluation of asymptomatic patients with suspected diaphragmatic injuries (1 patient). Of the remaining 188 patients, 58 (31{\%}) underwent laparotomy (56 therapeutic, 2 negative) and 130 (69{\%}) were initially observed owing to negative clinical examination. Following the development of increasing abdominal tenderness, 4 of these 130 o (3{\%}) underwent delayed explorations, which were all nontherapeutic. The sensitivity and specificity of initial clinical examination in detecting significant intraabdominal injuries were 100{\%} and 95{\%}, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mandatory laparotomy is not necessary for gunshot wounds of the back. Clinical examination is a safe method of selecting patients for nonoperative management. An observation period of 24 hours is adequate for patients with no abdominal symptoms.",
author = "Velmahos, {George C.} and Demetrios Demetriades and Esteban Foianini and Raymond Tatevossian and Cornwell, {Edward E.} and Asensio, {Juan A.} and Howard Belzberg and Berne, {Thomas V.}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00098-6",
language = "English",
volume = "174",
pages = "342--346",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds to the back

AU - Velmahos, George C.

AU - Demetriades, Demetrios

AU - Foianini, Esteban

AU - Tatevossian, Raymond

AU - Cornwell, Edward E.

AU - Asensio, Juan A.

AU - Belzberg, Howard

AU - Berne, Thomas V.

PY - 1997/9

Y1 - 1997/9

N2 - BACKGROUND: Gunshot wounds to the back with retroperitoneal trajectories have been traditionally managed under the same guidelines as anterior gunshot wounds. Recent work has suggested that selective nonoperative management of anterior abdominal gunshot wounds is safe. The role of this policy in gunshot wounds to the back, where retroperitoneal organ injuries may be more difficult to detect clinically, has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: TO examine if selective nonoperative management based on clinical assessment is a safe alternative to mandatory exploration for gun-shot wounds to the back. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Large-volume level-1 university affiliated trauma center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TWO hundred and three consecutive patients with gunshot wounds to the back were managed according to a protocol during a 12-month period. Patients with hemodynamic instability or peritonitis underwent urgent operation. The rest of the patients were observed with careful serial clinical examinations. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent an emergency room thoracotomy and were excluded. Four more patients were operated upon, despite the absence of abdominal findings, because of associated spinal cord injuries (2 patients), inability to observe due to need for repair of an associated peripheral vascular injury (1 patient), and participation in another protocol of aggressive evaluation of asymptomatic patients with suspected diaphragmatic injuries (1 patient). Of the remaining 188 patients, 58 (31%) underwent laparotomy (56 therapeutic, 2 negative) and 130 (69%) were initially observed owing to negative clinical examination. Following the development of increasing abdominal tenderness, 4 of these 130 o (3%) underwent delayed explorations, which were all nontherapeutic. The sensitivity and specificity of initial clinical examination in detecting significant intraabdominal injuries were 100% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mandatory laparotomy is not necessary for gunshot wounds of the back. Clinical examination is a safe method of selecting patients for nonoperative management. An observation period of 24 hours is adequate for patients with no abdominal symptoms.

AB - BACKGROUND: Gunshot wounds to the back with retroperitoneal trajectories have been traditionally managed under the same guidelines as anterior gunshot wounds. Recent work has suggested that selective nonoperative management of anterior abdominal gunshot wounds is safe. The role of this policy in gunshot wounds to the back, where retroperitoneal organ injuries may be more difficult to detect clinically, has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: TO examine if selective nonoperative management based on clinical assessment is a safe alternative to mandatory exploration for gun-shot wounds to the back. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Large-volume level-1 university affiliated trauma center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TWO hundred and three consecutive patients with gunshot wounds to the back were managed according to a protocol during a 12-month period. Patients with hemodynamic instability or peritonitis underwent urgent operation. The rest of the patients were observed with careful serial clinical examinations. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent an emergency room thoracotomy and were excluded. Four more patients were operated upon, despite the absence of abdominal findings, because of associated spinal cord injuries (2 patients), inability to observe due to need for repair of an associated peripheral vascular injury (1 patient), and participation in another protocol of aggressive evaluation of asymptomatic patients with suspected diaphragmatic injuries (1 patient). Of the remaining 188 patients, 58 (31%) underwent laparotomy (56 therapeutic, 2 negative) and 130 (69%) were initially observed owing to negative clinical examination. Following the development of increasing abdominal tenderness, 4 of these 130 o (3%) underwent delayed explorations, which were all nontherapeutic. The sensitivity and specificity of initial clinical examination in detecting significant intraabdominal injuries were 100% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mandatory laparotomy is not necessary for gunshot wounds of the back. Clinical examination is a safe method of selecting patients for nonoperative management. An observation period of 24 hours is adequate for patients with no abdominal symptoms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030754754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030754754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00098-6

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00098-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 9324151

AN - SCOPUS:0030754754

VL - 174

SP - 342

EP - 346

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 3

ER -