Accuracy of mandibular cross-sectional imaging with tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT), iteratively reconstructed TACT, and multidirectional, linear, and transverse panoramic tomography

Hui Liang, Donald A. Tyndall, John B. Ludlow, Lisa A. Lang, Martha E. Nunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. This study was designed to compare 5 modalities with respect to accuracy in mandibular cross-sectional imaging. The modalities tested were tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT), iteratively reconstructed TACT, multidirectional tomography, linear tomography, and transverse panoramic tomography. Study design. Twenty sites were selected from 3 dry human mandibles, and cross-sectional views were imaged through use of each of the 5 modalities. A quantitative analysis included measurements of 2 linear distances; a qualitative study included image evaluation by 6 observers. A nested mixed analysis of variance model was used to control for mandibles and locations within mandibles for the quantitative analysis; the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used for the qualitative analysis. Results. There was a significant difference in measurement error for maximum height but not for width. There was also a significant difference in qualitative image evaluation results. Conclusions. Of the 5 modalities tested, the narrow-layer multidirectional tomographic technique produced the greatest diagnostic accuracy and quality in cross-sectional imaging. The transverse panoramic tomographic technique produced the least diagnostic accuracy and quality. Linear tomography, TACT, and iteratively reconstructed TACT were intermediate in accuracy and quality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)594-602
Number of pages9
JournalOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics
Volume91
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tomography
Mandible
Analysis of Variance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{43ba8e4b93df4ed4a910d282ca49d25a,
title = "Accuracy of mandibular cross-sectional imaging with tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT), iteratively reconstructed TACT, and multidirectional, linear, and transverse panoramic tomography",
abstract = "Objective. This study was designed to compare 5 modalities with respect to accuracy in mandibular cross-sectional imaging. The modalities tested were tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT), iteratively reconstructed TACT, multidirectional tomography, linear tomography, and transverse panoramic tomography. Study design. Twenty sites were selected from 3 dry human mandibles, and cross-sectional views were imaged through use of each of the 5 modalities. A quantitative analysis included measurements of 2 linear distances; a qualitative study included image evaluation by 6 observers. A nested mixed analysis of variance model was used to control for mandibles and locations within mandibles for the quantitative analysis; the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used for the qualitative analysis. Results. There was a significant difference in measurement error for maximum height but not for width. There was also a significant difference in qualitative image evaluation results. Conclusions. Of the 5 modalities tested, the narrow-layer multidirectional tomographic technique produced the greatest diagnostic accuracy and quality in cross-sectional imaging. The transverse panoramic tomographic technique produced the least diagnostic accuracy and quality. Linear tomography, TACT, and iteratively reconstructed TACT were intermediate in accuracy and quality.",
author = "Hui Liang and Tyndall, {Donald A.} and Ludlow, {John B.} and Lang, {Lisa A.} and Nunn, {Martha E.}",
year = "2001",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1067/moe.2001.112157",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "594--602",
journal = "Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology",
issn = "2212-4403",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of mandibular cross-sectional imaging with tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT), iteratively reconstructed TACT, and multidirectional, linear, and transverse panoramic tomography

AU - Liang, Hui

AU - Tyndall, Donald A.

AU - Ludlow, John B.

AU - Lang, Lisa A.

AU - Nunn, Martha E.

PY - 2001/5

Y1 - 2001/5

N2 - Objective. This study was designed to compare 5 modalities with respect to accuracy in mandibular cross-sectional imaging. The modalities tested were tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT), iteratively reconstructed TACT, multidirectional tomography, linear tomography, and transverse panoramic tomography. Study design. Twenty sites were selected from 3 dry human mandibles, and cross-sectional views were imaged through use of each of the 5 modalities. A quantitative analysis included measurements of 2 linear distances; a qualitative study included image evaluation by 6 observers. A nested mixed analysis of variance model was used to control for mandibles and locations within mandibles for the quantitative analysis; the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used for the qualitative analysis. Results. There was a significant difference in measurement error for maximum height but not for width. There was also a significant difference in qualitative image evaluation results. Conclusions. Of the 5 modalities tested, the narrow-layer multidirectional tomographic technique produced the greatest diagnostic accuracy and quality in cross-sectional imaging. The transverse panoramic tomographic technique produced the least diagnostic accuracy and quality. Linear tomography, TACT, and iteratively reconstructed TACT were intermediate in accuracy and quality.

AB - Objective. This study was designed to compare 5 modalities with respect to accuracy in mandibular cross-sectional imaging. The modalities tested were tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT), iteratively reconstructed TACT, multidirectional tomography, linear tomography, and transverse panoramic tomography. Study design. Twenty sites were selected from 3 dry human mandibles, and cross-sectional views were imaged through use of each of the 5 modalities. A quantitative analysis included measurements of 2 linear distances; a qualitative study included image evaluation by 6 observers. A nested mixed analysis of variance model was used to control for mandibles and locations within mandibles for the quantitative analysis; the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used for the qualitative analysis. Results. There was a significant difference in measurement error for maximum height but not for width. There was also a significant difference in qualitative image evaluation results. Conclusions. Of the 5 modalities tested, the narrow-layer multidirectional tomographic technique produced the greatest diagnostic accuracy and quality in cross-sectional imaging. The transverse panoramic tomographic technique produced the least diagnostic accuracy and quality. Linear tomography, TACT, and iteratively reconstructed TACT were intermediate in accuracy and quality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035344522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035344522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/moe.2001.112157

DO - 10.1067/moe.2001.112157

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 594

EP - 602

JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

SN - 2212-4403

IS - 5

ER -