An analysis of an intensive supervision program for sex offenders using propensity scores

Alan Buttars, Matthew T. Huss, Carl Brack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The last several decades have seen an expansion of intensive supervision to address sexual violence. The current study examines a population of 885 sex offenders supervised by a single Midwestern Department of Corrections in the United States and assigned to intensive supervision, residential treatment, or standard probation. This study used propensity analysis to control for nonrandom assignment of offenders to the different intervention conditions. When controlling for propensity scores, overall, analyses revealed no significant differences in recidivism rates or severity of recidivated offenses between intervention groups. However, offenders in residential treatment were more likely to revocate and to commit more revocations than intensive supervision or standard probation offenders, even after controlling for propensity score. Discussion focuses on the role of intervention components as a possible explanation for lack of intervention differences, as well as future implications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-68
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Offender Rehabilitation
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2016

Fingerprint

Propensity Score
supervision
offender
Residential Treatment
probation
Sex Offenses
sexual violence
offense
lack
Population
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

An analysis of an intensive supervision program for sex offenders using propensity scores. / Buttars, Alan; Huss, Matthew T.; Brack, Carl.

In: Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, Vol. 55, No. 1, 02.01.2016, p. 51-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9489f8933dfd43a68c65ddb8e7ba78a2,
title = "An analysis of an intensive supervision program for sex offenders using propensity scores",
abstract = "The last several decades have seen an expansion of intensive supervision to address sexual violence. The current study examines a population of 885 sex offenders supervised by a single Midwestern Department of Corrections in the United States and assigned to intensive supervision, residential treatment, or standard probation. This study used propensity analysis to control for nonrandom assignment of offenders to the different intervention conditions. When controlling for propensity scores, overall, analyses revealed no significant differences in recidivism rates or severity of recidivated offenses between intervention groups. However, offenders in residential treatment were more likely to revocate and to commit more revocations than intensive supervision or standard probation offenders, even after controlling for propensity score. Discussion focuses on the role of intervention components as a possible explanation for lack of intervention differences, as well as future implications.",
author = "Alan Buttars and Huss, {Matthew T.} and Carl Brack",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10509674.2015.1107003",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "51--68",
journal = "Journal of Offender Rehabilitation",
issn = "1050-9674",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An analysis of an intensive supervision program for sex offenders using propensity scores

AU - Buttars, Alan

AU - Huss, Matthew T.

AU - Brack, Carl

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - The last several decades have seen an expansion of intensive supervision to address sexual violence. The current study examines a population of 885 sex offenders supervised by a single Midwestern Department of Corrections in the United States and assigned to intensive supervision, residential treatment, or standard probation. This study used propensity analysis to control for nonrandom assignment of offenders to the different intervention conditions. When controlling for propensity scores, overall, analyses revealed no significant differences in recidivism rates or severity of recidivated offenses between intervention groups. However, offenders in residential treatment were more likely to revocate and to commit more revocations than intensive supervision or standard probation offenders, even after controlling for propensity score. Discussion focuses on the role of intervention components as a possible explanation for lack of intervention differences, as well as future implications.

AB - The last several decades have seen an expansion of intensive supervision to address sexual violence. The current study examines a population of 885 sex offenders supervised by a single Midwestern Department of Corrections in the United States and assigned to intensive supervision, residential treatment, or standard probation. This study used propensity analysis to control for nonrandom assignment of offenders to the different intervention conditions. When controlling for propensity scores, overall, analyses revealed no significant differences in recidivism rates or severity of recidivated offenses between intervention groups. However, offenders in residential treatment were more likely to revocate and to commit more revocations than intensive supervision or standard probation offenders, even after controlling for propensity score. Discussion focuses on the role of intervention components as a possible explanation for lack of intervention differences, as well as future implications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947490805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947490805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10509674.2015.1107003

DO - 10.1080/10509674.2015.1107003

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 51

EP - 68

JO - Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

SN - 1050-9674

IS - 1

ER -