An assessment of pain and return to normal activity: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair

Charles Filipi, F. Gaston-Johansson, P. J. McBride, K. Murayama, J. Gerhardt, D. A. Cornet, R. J. Lund, D. Hirai, R. Graham, K. Patil, Robert Joseph Fitzgibbons, R. D. Gaines

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is controversial and deserves critical evaluation. Methods: In a randomized prospective study transabdomina! preperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (n = 24) was compared in patients to the tension-free Lichtenstein repair (n = 29) utilizing validated and reliable pain and activity assessment tools. The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) was used to compare preoperative normal activity to postoperative activity. A Pain-O-Meter (visual analogue scale plus affective and sensory pain descriptors) assessed intensity of pain. The total pain assessment score and SIP were compared across time (postoperative day 1-42). Analgesic medication was used as a covariate. Results: The total pain score was less for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy but this did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, the SIP showed modest improvement for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. No differences between groups were noted for morphine equivalents of administered analgesics or length of hospitalization. Conclusion: Further investigation of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)983-986
Number of pages4
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
Volume10
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1996

Fingerprint

Herniorrhaphy
Pain Measurement
Sickness Impact Profile
Pain
Analgesics
Visual Analog Scale
Morphine
Hospitalization
Prospective Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Filipi, C., Gaston-Johansson, F., McBride, P. J., Murayama, K., Gerhardt, J., Cornet, D. A., ... Gaines, R. D. (1996). An assessment of pain and return to normal activity: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair. Surgical Endoscopy, 10(10), 983-986.

An assessment of pain and return to normal activity : Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair. / Filipi, Charles; Gaston-Johansson, F.; McBride, P. J.; Murayama, K.; Gerhardt, J.; Cornet, D. A.; Lund, R. J.; Hirai, D.; Graham, R.; Patil, K.; Fitzgibbons, Robert Joseph; Gaines, R. D.

In: Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 10, No. 10, 10.1996, p. 983-986.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Filipi, C, Gaston-Johansson, F, McBride, PJ, Murayama, K, Gerhardt, J, Cornet, DA, Lund, RJ, Hirai, D, Graham, R, Patil, K, Fitzgibbons, RJ & Gaines, RD 1996, 'An assessment of pain and return to normal activity: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair', Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 983-986.
Filipi C, Gaston-Johansson F, McBride PJ, Murayama K, Gerhardt J, Cornet DA et al. An assessment of pain and return to normal activity: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair. Surgical Endoscopy. 1996 Oct;10(10):983-986.
Filipi, Charles ; Gaston-Johansson, F. ; McBride, P. J. ; Murayama, K. ; Gerhardt, J. ; Cornet, D. A. ; Lund, R. J. ; Hirai, D. ; Graham, R. ; Patil, K. ; Fitzgibbons, Robert Joseph ; Gaines, R. D. / An assessment of pain and return to normal activity : Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair. In: Surgical Endoscopy. 1996 ; Vol. 10, No. 10. pp. 983-986.
@article{d6080dea1d304bdd85ecd504e7740cb3,
title = "An assessment of pain and return to normal activity: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair",
abstract = "Background: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is controversial and deserves critical evaluation. Methods: In a randomized prospective study transabdomina! preperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (n = 24) was compared in patients to the tension-free Lichtenstein repair (n = 29) utilizing validated and reliable pain and activity assessment tools. The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) was used to compare preoperative normal activity to postoperative activity. A Pain-O-Meter (visual analogue scale plus affective and sensory pain descriptors) assessed intensity of pain. The total pain assessment score and SIP were compared across time (postoperative day 1-42). Analgesic medication was used as a covariate. Results: The total pain score was less for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy but this did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, the SIP showed modest improvement for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. No differences between groups were noted for morphine equivalents of administered analgesics or length of hospitalization. Conclusion: Further investigation of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is warranted.",
author = "Charles Filipi and F. Gaston-Johansson and McBride, {P. J.} and K. Murayama and J. Gerhardt and Cornet, {D. A.} and Lund, {R. J.} and D. Hirai and R. Graham and K. Patil and Fitzgibbons, {Robert Joseph} and Gaines, {R. D.}",
year = "1996",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "983--986",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment of pain and return to normal activity

T2 - Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair

AU - Filipi, Charles

AU - Gaston-Johansson, F.

AU - McBride, P. J.

AU - Murayama, K.

AU - Gerhardt, J.

AU - Cornet, D. A.

AU - Lund, R. J.

AU - Hirai, D.

AU - Graham, R.

AU - Patil, K.

AU - Fitzgibbons, Robert Joseph

AU - Gaines, R. D.

PY - 1996/10

Y1 - 1996/10

N2 - Background: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is controversial and deserves critical evaluation. Methods: In a randomized prospective study transabdomina! preperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (n = 24) was compared in patients to the tension-free Lichtenstein repair (n = 29) utilizing validated and reliable pain and activity assessment tools. The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) was used to compare preoperative normal activity to postoperative activity. A Pain-O-Meter (visual analogue scale plus affective and sensory pain descriptors) assessed intensity of pain. The total pain assessment score and SIP were compared across time (postoperative day 1-42). Analgesic medication was used as a covariate. Results: The total pain score was less for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy but this did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, the SIP showed modest improvement for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. No differences between groups were noted for morphine equivalents of administered analgesics or length of hospitalization. Conclusion: Further investigation of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is warranted.

AB - Background: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is controversial and deserves critical evaluation. Methods: In a randomized prospective study transabdomina! preperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (n = 24) was compared in patients to the tension-free Lichtenstein repair (n = 29) utilizing validated and reliable pain and activity assessment tools. The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) was used to compare preoperative normal activity to postoperative activity. A Pain-O-Meter (visual analogue scale plus affective and sensory pain descriptors) assessed intensity of pain. The total pain assessment score and SIP were compared across time (postoperative day 1-42). Analgesic medication was used as a covariate. Results: The total pain score was less for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy but this did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, the SIP showed modest improvement for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. No differences between groups were noted for morphine equivalents of administered analgesics or length of hospitalization. Conclusion: Further investigation of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030266131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030266131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8864090

AN - SCOPUS:0030266131

VL - 10

SP - 983

EP - 986

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 10

ER -