Anticipated affect and sentencing decisions in capital murder

Richard L. Wiener, Leah Georges, Juan Cangas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies examine the effects of anticipated emotion on mock jurors' sentencing at the conclusion of a reenactment of a capital murder trial. Together the 2 studies examined the assumption in the Eighth Amendment that the law guides jurors' discretion by directing them to avoid their own sentiments and instead balance aggravation and mitigation to reach a penalty decision in capital murder cases. Study 1 and Study 2 examined the affective forecasts of the positive and negative emotions jurors expected to feel whether they sentenced a convicted murderer to death or whether they sentenced him to life in prison. In 1 study, the anticipated emotions and sentences came from the same participants in a repeated measures design. The second study included a 1 group of forecasters and a second independent group of experiencers, the latter of which did not forecast their emotions post sentence. Forecasters in Study 1 and Study 2 who anticipated feeling more intense positive emotions after assigning a death sentence were more likely to invoke a death sentence even though their positive feelings immediately postsentence were less intense than they had anticipated and the facts of the sentencing phase were the same. Furthermore, those who sentenced the defendant to life also anticipated more intense positive emotions following a life verdict than they actually experienced immediately after their verdict. The paper discusses the intensity bias and the meaning of the findings for the death penalty based upon the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-280
Number of pages18
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Homicide
homicide
Emotions
emotion
death
amendment
penalty
death penalty
Capital Punishment
correctional institution
Punishment
Prisons
Group
Law
trend

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Anticipated affect and sentencing decisions in capital murder. / Wiener, Richard L.; Georges, Leah; Cangas, Juan.

In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2014, p. 263-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wiener, Richard L. ; Georges, Leah ; Cangas, Juan. / Anticipated affect and sentencing decisions in capital murder. In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2014 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 263-280.
@article{62528a59125c45b3b6e775515162fec9,
title = "Anticipated affect and sentencing decisions in capital murder",
abstract = "Two studies examine the effects of anticipated emotion on mock jurors' sentencing at the conclusion of a reenactment of a capital murder trial. Together the 2 studies examined the assumption in the Eighth Amendment that the law guides jurors' discretion by directing them to avoid their own sentiments and instead balance aggravation and mitigation to reach a penalty decision in capital murder cases. Study 1 and Study 2 examined the affective forecasts of the positive and negative emotions jurors expected to feel whether they sentenced a convicted murderer to death or whether they sentenced him to life in prison. In 1 study, the anticipated emotions and sentences came from the same participants in a repeated measures design. The second study included a 1 group of forecasters and a second independent group of experiencers, the latter of which did not forecast their emotions post sentence. Forecasters in Study 1 and Study 2 who anticipated feeling more intense positive emotions after assigning a death sentence were more likely to invoke a death sentence even though their positive feelings immediately postsentence were less intense than they had anticipated and the facts of the sentencing phase were the same. Furthermore, those who sentenced the defendant to life also anticipated more intense positive emotions following a life verdict than they actually experienced immediately after their verdict. The paper discusses the intensity bias and the meaning of the findings for the death penalty based upon the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment.",
author = "Wiener, {Richard L.} and Leah Georges and Juan Cangas",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1037/law0000014",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "263--280",
journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
issn = "1076-8971",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anticipated affect and sentencing decisions in capital murder

AU - Wiener, Richard L.

AU - Georges, Leah

AU - Cangas, Juan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Two studies examine the effects of anticipated emotion on mock jurors' sentencing at the conclusion of a reenactment of a capital murder trial. Together the 2 studies examined the assumption in the Eighth Amendment that the law guides jurors' discretion by directing them to avoid their own sentiments and instead balance aggravation and mitigation to reach a penalty decision in capital murder cases. Study 1 and Study 2 examined the affective forecasts of the positive and negative emotions jurors expected to feel whether they sentenced a convicted murderer to death or whether they sentenced him to life in prison. In 1 study, the anticipated emotions and sentences came from the same participants in a repeated measures design. The second study included a 1 group of forecasters and a second independent group of experiencers, the latter of which did not forecast their emotions post sentence. Forecasters in Study 1 and Study 2 who anticipated feeling more intense positive emotions after assigning a death sentence were more likely to invoke a death sentence even though their positive feelings immediately postsentence were less intense than they had anticipated and the facts of the sentencing phase were the same. Furthermore, those who sentenced the defendant to life also anticipated more intense positive emotions following a life verdict than they actually experienced immediately after their verdict. The paper discusses the intensity bias and the meaning of the findings for the death penalty based upon the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment.

AB - Two studies examine the effects of anticipated emotion on mock jurors' sentencing at the conclusion of a reenactment of a capital murder trial. Together the 2 studies examined the assumption in the Eighth Amendment that the law guides jurors' discretion by directing them to avoid their own sentiments and instead balance aggravation and mitigation to reach a penalty decision in capital murder cases. Study 1 and Study 2 examined the affective forecasts of the positive and negative emotions jurors expected to feel whether they sentenced a convicted murderer to death or whether they sentenced him to life in prison. In 1 study, the anticipated emotions and sentences came from the same participants in a repeated measures design. The second study included a 1 group of forecasters and a second independent group of experiencers, the latter of which did not forecast their emotions post sentence. Forecasters in Study 1 and Study 2 who anticipated feeling more intense positive emotions after assigning a death sentence were more likely to invoke a death sentence even though their positive feelings immediately postsentence were less intense than they had anticipated and the facts of the sentencing phase were the same. Furthermore, those who sentenced the defendant to life also anticipated more intense positive emotions following a life verdict than they actually experienced immediately after their verdict. The paper discusses the intensity bias and the meaning of the findings for the death penalty based upon the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905235623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905235623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/law0000014

DO - 10.1037/law0000014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84905235623

VL - 20

SP - 263

EP - 280

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

SN - 1076-8971

IS - 3

ER -