Abstract
Solving the health care consumers' (producers') utility maximization (cost minimization) problem could entail the substitution of alternative care providers (factor inputs) when the relative out-of-pocket costs (factor prices) change, ceteris paribus. The conceptual advancement in this contribution is illustrated with an earlier paper (P. Deb and A. Holmes, Health Economics 7(4):347-362, 1998) on the economic relationship of physicians (M.D.s) and 'other providers' (Ph.D.s, other) in the US outpatient demand for mental health care services. Many aspects of our conceptual progress are insightful. Foremost, our conclusion on whether M.D. and non-M.D. providers of outpatient mental health care are economic complements or substitutes depends on the alternative measure of the substitution elasticity used. Second, when correctly measured the expenditure-minimizing substitutions among mental health providers can be useful policy decision guides for consumers covered under traditional indemnity insurance with deductibles or managed care plans with user co-payments. Finally, our conceptual clarification should motivate future investigators of health services demand (or use) and cost models to consider a wider conceptual foundation for assessing the structure and implications of provider relationships.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 393-398 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Health Care Management Science |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2008 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Medicine (miscellaneous)
- Health Professions(all)
Cite this
Are physician and non-physician providers of outpatient mental healthcare substitutes or complements? A conceptual clarification. / Okunade, Albert A.; Murthy, Vasudeva N. R.
In: Health Care Management Science, Vol. 11, No. 4, 12.2008, p. 393-398.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Are physician and non-physician providers of outpatient mental healthcare substitutes or complements? A conceptual clarification
AU - Okunade, Albert A.
AU - Murthy, Vasudeva N. R.
PY - 2008/12
Y1 - 2008/12
N2 - Solving the health care consumers' (producers') utility maximization (cost minimization) problem could entail the substitution of alternative care providers (factor inputs) when the relative out-of-pocket costs (factor prices) change, ceteris paribus. The conceptual advancement in this contribution is illustrated with an earlier paper (P. Deb and A. Holmes, Health Economics 7(4):347-362, 1998) on the economic relationship of physicians (M.D.s) and 'other providers' (Ph.D.s, other) in the US outpatient demand for mental health care services. Many aspects of our conceptual progress are insightful. Foremost, our conclusion on whether M.D. and non-M.D. providers of outpatient mental health care are economic complements or substitutes depends on the alternative measure of the substitution elasticity used. Second, when correctly measured the expenditure-minimizing substitutions among mental health providers can be useful policy decision guides for consumers covered under traditional indemnity insurance with deductibles or managed care plans with user co-payments. Finally, our conceptual clarification should motivate future investigators of health services demand (or use) and cost models to consider a wider conceptual foundation for assessing the structure and implications of provider relationships.
AB - Solving the health care consumers' (producers') utility maximization (cost minimization) problem could entail the substitution of alternative care providers (factor inputs) when the relative out-of-pocket costs (factor prices) change, ceteris paribus. The conceptual advancement in this contribution is illustrated with an earlier paper (P. Deb and A. Holmes, Health Economics 7(4):347-362, 1998) on the economic relationship of physicians (M.D.s) and 'other providers' (Ph.D.s, other) in the US outpatient demand for mental health care services. Many aspects of our conceptual progress are insightful. Foremost, our conclusion on whether M.D. and non-M.D. providers of outpatient mental health care are economic complements or substitutes depends on the alternative measure of the substitution elasticity used. Second, when correctly measured the expenditure-minimizing substitutions among mental health providers can be useful policy decision guides for consumers covered under traditional indemnity insurance with deductibles or managed care plans with user co-payments. Finally, our conceptual clarification should motivate future investigators of health services demand (or use) and cost models to consider a wider conceptual foundation for assessing the structure and implications of provider relationships.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149198976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149198976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10729-007-9044-5
DO - 10.1007/s10729-007-9044-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 18998598
AN - SCOPUS:58149198976
VL - 11
SP - 393
EP - 398
JO - Health Care Management Science
JF - Health Care Management Science
SN - 1386-9620
IS - 4
ER -