Assessment of Clinical Alarms Influencing Nurses' Perceptions of Alarm Fatigue

Emalie M. Petersen, Cindy Costanzo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Excessive clinical alarms have inundated health care for years. Multiple governing bodies, organizations, and facilities have deemed alarm management a priority. Alarm management is a multifaceted problem that affects all health care organizations and clinical staff, especially those in critical care units. Ultimately, the lack of knowledge regarding nurses' perceptions to alarm management and alarm fatigue creates patient safety chiasms. Objectives: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to understand nurses' perceptions of alarm fatigue (utilizing the Healthcare Technology Foundation's Clinical Alarms Committee Survey) while implementing interventions that improve patient safety. Methods: The design of this qualitative study is an electronically distributed survey to 31 nurses who work in critical care. The Healthcare Technology Foundation clinical alarms survey has 36 questions with various answering strategies distributed (with permission) via e-mail access by BlueQ through Creighton University. Results: Twenty-six respondents (n = 26) completed the survey, with 42% being intensive care unit nurses and 58% being progressive care unit nurses. The majority of nurses (n = 23, 88%) agreed that nuisance alarms occur frequently and disrupt patient care (n = 25, 96%). A lack of standardized method was noted to alarm management and parameter changes. Multiple patterns emerged that initiated the need for further examination and improvement. Discussion: Following the survey, themes emerged, and changes were implemented including the following: an alarm management policy was created, tools were provided to staff for easy usage, staff were educated using hands-on practice at an annual training summit, and sustainability was created through continuation of alarm management assessment and improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-44
Number of pages9
JournalDimensions of Critical Care Nursing
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Clinical Alarms
Fatigue
Nurses
Delivery of Health Care
Critical Care
Patient Safety
Organizations
Technology
Postal Service
Quality Improvement
Intensive Care Units
Surveys and Questionnaires
Patient Care

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Emergency
  • Critical Care

Cite this

Assessment of Clinical Alarms Influencing Nurses' Perceptions of Alarm Fatigue. / Petersen, Emalie M.; Costanzo, Cindy.

In: Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 36-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{c64bf8f2925f4b8e99310b76f29a3c03,
title = "Assessment of Clinical Alarms Influencing Nurses' Perceptions of Alarm Fatigue",
abstract = "Background: Excessive clinical alarms have inundated health care for years. Multiple governing bodies, organizations, and facilities have deemed alarm management a priority. Alarm management is a multifaceted problem that affects all health care organizations and clinical staff, especially those in critical care units. Ultimately, the lack of knowledge regarding nurses' perceptions to alarm management and alarm fatigue creates patient safety chiasms. Objectives: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to understand nurses' perceptions of alarm fatigue (utilizing the Healthcare Technology Foundation's Clinical Alarms Committee Survey) while implementing interventions that improve patient safety. Methods: The design of this qualitative study is an electronically distributed survey to 31 nurses who work in critical care. The Healthcare Technology Foundation clinical alarms survey has 36 questions with various answering strategies distributed (with permission) via e-mail access by BlueQ through Creighton University. Results: Twenty-six respondents (n = 26) completed the survey, with 42{\%} being intensive care unit nurses and 58{\%} being progressive care unit nurses. The majority of nurses (n = 23, 88{\%}) agreed that nuisance alarms occur frequently and disrupt patient care (n = 25, 96{\%}). A lack of standardized method was noted to alarm management and parameter changes. Multiple patterns emerged that initiated the need for further examination and improvement. Discussion: Following the survey, themes emerged, and changes were implemented including the following: an alarm management policy was created, tools were provided to staff for easy usage, staff were educated using hands-on practice at an annual training summit, and sustainability was created through continuation of alarm management assessment and improvement.",
author = "Petersen, {Emalie M.} and Cindy Costanzo",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/DCC.0000000000000220",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "36--44",
journal = "Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing",
issn = "0730-4625",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of Clinical Alarms Influencing Nurses' Perceptions of Alarm Fatigue

AU - Petersen, Emalie M.

AU - Costanzo, Cindy

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: Excessive clinical alarms have inundated health care for years. Multiple governing bodies, organizations, and facilities have deemed alarm management a priority. Alarm management is a multifaceted problem that affects all health care organizations and clinical staff, especially those in critical care units. Ultimately, the lack of knowledge regarding nurses' perceptions to alarm management and alarm fatigue creates patient safety chiasms. Objectives: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to understand nurses' perceptions of alarm fatigue (utilizing the Healthcare Technology Foundation's Clinical Alarms Committee Survey) while implementing interventions that improve patient safety. Methods: The design of this qualitative study is an electronically distributed survey to 31 nurses who work in critical care. The Healthcare Technology Foundation clinical alarms survey has 36 questions with various answering strategies distributed (with permission) via e-mail access by BlueQ through Creighton University. Results: Twenty-six respondents (n = 26) completed the survey, with 42% being intensive care unit nurses and 58% being progressive care unit nurses. The majority of nurses (n = 23, 88%) agreed that nuisance alarms occur frequently and disrupt patient care (n = 25, 96%). A lack of standardized method was noted to alarm management and parameter changes. Multiple patterns emerged that initiated the need for further examination and improvement. Discussion: Following the survey, themes emerged, and changes were implemented including the following: an alarm management policy was created, tools were provided to staff for easy usage, staff were educated using hands-on practice at an annual training summit, and sustainability was created through continuation of alarm management assessment and improvement.

AB - Background: Excessive clinical alarms have inundated health care for years. Multiple governing bodies, organizations, and facilities have deemed alarm management a priority. Alarm management is a multifaceted problem that affects all health care organizations and clinical staff, especially those in critical care units. Ultimately, the lack of knowledge regarding nurses' perceptions to alarm management and alarm fatigue creates patient safety chiasms. Objectives: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to understand nurses' perceptions of alarm fatigue (utilizing the Healthcare Technology Foundation's Clinical Alarms Committee Survey) while implementing interventions that improve patient safety. Methods: The design of this qualitative study is an electronically distributed survey to 31 nurses who work in critical care. The Healthcare Technology Foundation clinical alarms survey has 36 questions with various answering strategies distributed (with permission) via e-mail access by BlueQ through Creighton University. Results: Twenty-six respondents (n = 26) completed the survey, with 42% being intensive care unit nurses and 58% being progressive care unit nurses. The majority of nurses (n = 23, 88%) agreed that nuisance alarms occur frequently and disrupt patient care (n = 25, 96%). A lack of standardized method was noted to alarm management and parameter changes. Multiple patterns emerged that initiated the need for further examination and improvement. Discussion: Following the survey, themes emerged, and changes were implemented including the following: an alarm management policy was created, tools were provided to staff for easy usage, staff were educated using hands-on practice at an annual training summit, and sustainability was created through continuation of alarm management assessment and improvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006321117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006321117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000220

DO - 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000220

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27902661

AN - SCOPUS:85006321117

VL - 36

SP - 36

EP - 44

JO - Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing

JF - Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing

SN - 0730-4625

IS - 1

ER -