Association of VDR and estrogen receptor genotypes with bone mass in postmenopausal caucasian women: Different conclusions with different analyses and the implications

Hong Wen Deng, Jian Li, Jin Long Li, M. Johnson, G. Gong, Robert R. Recker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Much work has been done on the association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) genotypes and bone mineral density (BMD). Despite considerable effort, the results are inconsistent. While the VDR association remains unresolved, studies have expanded to other candidate genes (i.e., estrogen receptor (ER) genotypes), also yielding inconsistent results. A few studies have suggested that interaction effects between VDR and ER genotypes significantly affect BMD. We assessed associations of BMD with VDR BsmI genotypes, and ER XbaI and PvuII polymorphisms (denoted as ERX and ERP respectively) with spine, femoral neck, distal radius BMD, and with total body bone mineral content (tbBMC) in 108 US Mid-western postmenopausal Caucasian women. We statistically controlled for confounding factors such as height, weight, etc., in the analysis. No significant association was detected for ER genotypes with spine and radius BMD, or for VDR genotypes with femoral neck and radius BMD and tbBMC. No significant interaction between VDR and ER genotypes was detected in our sample. However, the VDR genotypes are significantly (p = 0.004) associated with ~ 5.8% spine BMD variation. Both ERX and ERP genotypes are significantly (p = 0.02) associated with ~ 3.5% femoral neck BMD variation. ERX genotypes are significantly (p = 0.03) associated with ~ 2.4% tbBMC variation. However, if the data were analyzed by simple ANOVA as in some previous studies, without adjusting statistically for confounding factors, all the significant results we found here would have pone undetected. Our findings suggest that: (1) VDR and ER genotypes may have different effects on BMD at different sites and on tbBMC; and (2) if significant factors influencing bone are not appropiately controlled, true significant associations can easily be missed. These findings may offer a partial explanation for some of the earlier inconsistent results of association studies on BMD with VDR and ER genotypes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)499-507
Number of pages9
JournalOsteoporosis International
Volume9
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Calcitriol Receptors
Estrogen Receptors
Bone Density
Genotype
Bone and Bones
Femur Neck
Spine

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Association of VDR and estrogen receptor genotypes with bone mass in postmenopausal caucasian women : Different conclusions with different analyses and the implications. / Deng, Hong Wen; Li, Jian; Li, Jin Long; Johnson, M.; Gong, G.; Recker, Robert R.

In: Osteoporosis International, Vol. 9, No. 6, 1999, p. 499-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a99b39f62f6a491591d6eb2ee76bb43a,
title = "Association of VDR and estrogen receptor genotypes with bone mass in postmenopausal caucasian women: Different conclusions with different analyses and the implications",
abstract = "Much work has been done on the association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) genotypes and bone mineral density (BMD). Despite considerable effort, the results are inconsistent. While the VDR association remains unresolved, studies have expanded to other candidate genes (i.e., estrogen receptor (ER) genotypes), also yielding inconsistent results. A few studies have suggested that interaction effects between VDR and ER genotypes significantly affect BMD. We assessed associations of BMD with VDR BsmI genotypes, and ER XbaI and PvuII polymorphisms (denoted as ERX and ERP respectively) with spine, femoral neck, distal radius BMD, and with total body bone mineral content (tbBMC) in 108 US Mid-western postmenopausal Caucasian women. We statistically controlled for confounding factors such as height, weight, etc., in the analysis. No significant association was detected for ER genotypes with spine and radius BMD, or for VDR genotypes with femoral neck and radius BMD and tbBMC. No significant interaction between VDR and ER genotypes was detected in our sample. However, the VDR genotypes are significantly (p = 0.004) associated with ~ 5.8{\%} spine BMD variation. Both ERX and ERP genotypes are significantly (p = 0.02) associated with ~ 3.5{\%} femoral neck BMD variation. ERX genotypes are significantly (p = 0.03) associated with ~ 2.4{\%} tbBMC variation. However, if the data were analyzed by simple ANOVA as in some previous studies, without adjusting statistically for confounding factors, all the significant results we found here would have pone undetected. Our findings suggest that: (1) VDR and ER genotypes may have different effects on BMD at different sites and on tbBMC; and (2) if significant factors influencing bone are not appropiately controlled, true significant associations can easily be missed. These findings may offer a partial explanation for some of the earlier inconsistent results of association studies on BMD with VDR and ER genotypes.",
author = "Deng, {Hong Wen} and Jian Li and Li, {Jin Long} and M. Johnson and G. Gong and Recker, {Robert R.}",
year = "1999",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "499--507",
journal = "Osteoporosis International",
issn = "0937-941X",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of VDR and estrogen receptor genotypes with bone mass in postmenopausal caucasian women

T2 - Different conclusions with different analyses and the implications

AU - Deng, Hong Wen

AU - Li, Jian

AU - Li, Jin Long

AU - Johnson, M.

AU - Gong, G.

AU - Recker, Robert R.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Much work has been done on the association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) genotypes and bone mineral density (BMD). Despite considerable effort, the results are inconsistent. While the VDR association remains unresolved, studies have expanded to other candidate genes (i.e., estrogen receptor (ER) genotypes), also yielding inconsistent results. A few studies have suggested that interaction effects between VDR and ER genotypes significantly affect BMD. We assessed associations of BMD with VDR BsmI genotypes, and ER XbaI and PvuII polymorphisms (denoted as ERX and ERP respectively) with spine, femoral neck, distal radius BMD, and with total body bone mineral content (tbBMC) in 108 US Mid-western postmenopausal Caucasian women. We statistically controlled for confounding factors such as height, weight, etc., in the analysis. No significant association was detected for ER genotypes with spine and radius BMD, or for VDR genotypes with femoral neck and radius BMD and tbBMC. No significant interaction between VDR and ER genotypes was detected in our sample. However, the VDR genotypes are significantly (p = 0.004) associated with ~ 5.8% spine BMD variation. Both ERX and ERP genotypes are significantly (p = 0.02) associated with ~ 3.5% femoral neck BMD variation. ERX genotypes are significantly (p = 0.03) associated with ~ 2.4% tbBMC variation. However, if the data were analyzed by simple ANOVA as in some previous studies, without adjusting statistically for confounding factors, all the significant results we found here would have pone undetected. Our findings suggest that: (1) VDR and ER genotypes may have different effects on BMD at different sites and on tbBMC; and (2) if significant factors influencing bone are not appropiately controlled, true significant associations can easily be missed. These findings may offer a partial explanation for some of the earlier inconsistent results of association studies on BMD with VDR and ER genotypes.

AB - Much work has been done on the association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) genotypes and bone mineral density (BMD). Despite considerable effort, the results are inconsistent. While the VDR association remains unresolved, studies have expanded to other candidate genes (i.e., estrogen receptor (ER) genotypes), also yielding inconsistent results. A few studies have suggested that interaction effects between VDR and ER genotypes significantly affect BMD. We assessed associations of BMD with VDR BsmI genotypes, and ER XbaI and PvuII polymorphisms (denoted as ERX and ERP respectively) with spine, femoral neck, distal radius BMD, and with total body bone mineral content (tbBMC) in 108 US Mid-western postmenopausal Caucasian women. We statistically controlled for confounding factors such as height, weight, etc., in the analysis. No significant association was detected for ER genotypes with spine and radius BMD, or for VDR genotypes with femoral neck and radius BMD and tbBMC. No significant interaction between VDR and ER genotypes was detected in our sample. However, the VDR genotypes are significantly (p = 0.004) associated with ~ 5.8% spine BMD variation. Both ERX and ERP genotypes are significantly (p = 0.02) associated with ~ 3.5% femoral neck BMD variation. ERX genotypes are significantly (p = 0.03) associated with ~ 2.4% tbBMC variation. However, if the data were analyzed by simple ANOVA as in some previous studies, without adjusting statistically for confounding factors, all the significant results we found here would have pone undetected. Our findings suggest that: (1) VDR and ER genotypes may have different effects on BMD at different sites and on tbBMC; and (2) if significant factors influencing bone are not appropiately controlled, true significant associations can easily be missed. These findings may offer a partial explanation for some of the earlier inconsistent results of association studies on BMD with VDR and ER genotypes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032804430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032804430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10624457

AN - SCOPUS:0032804430

VL - 9

SP - 499

EP - 507

JO - Osteoporosis International

JF - Osteoporosis International

SN - 0937-941X

IS - 6

ER -