Attributions About Perpetrators and Victims of Interpersonal Abuse Results From an Analogue Study

Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Rania K. Shlien-Dellinger, Matthew T. Huss, Vertrie L. Kramer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This analogue study (written vignettes and videotapes) examines the influence of victim-perpetrator relationship (spouse or acquaintance), sex of perceiver, and type of abuse (psychological vs. physical) on attributions about victims and perpetrators of domestic abuse. College student participants (73 men, 108 women) were randomly assigned to condition. As expected, type of relationship influenced observer perceptions. Specifically, participants rated the victim of marital violence as more psychologically damaged and disturbed by the abuse than the victim of acquaintance violence. Furthermore, interaction effects showed that men, more than women, rated the actions of the married perpetrator as more of a victim's rights violation than the actions of the acquaintance perpetrator. Second, type of abuse was shown to influence perceptions of the perpetrator but not the victim. Sex-of-perceiver effects were also obtained. Women held the perpetrator more responsible and assigned less blame to the victim than did men. Legal and clinical implications are then discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)484-498
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume19
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2004

Fingerprint

attribution
abuse
Violence
Videotape Recording
Spouses
Students
Psychology
violence
spouse
interaction
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Shlien-Dellinger, R. K., Huss, M. T., & Kramer, V. L. (2004). Attributions About Perpetrators and Victims of Interpersonal Abuse Results From an Analogue Study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(4), 484-498.

Attributions About Perpetrators and Victims of Interpersonal Abuse Results From an Analogue Study. / Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer; Shlien-Dellinger, Rania K.; Huss, Matthew T.; Kramer, Vertrie L.

In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 19, No. 4, 04.2004, p. 484-498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J, Shlien-Dellinger, RK, Huss, MT & Kramer, VL 2004, 'Attributions About Perpetrators and Victims of Interpersonal Abuse Results From an Analogue Study', Journal of Interpersonal Violence, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 484-498.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer ; Shlien-Dellinger, Rania K. ; Huss, Matthew T. ; Kramer, Vertrie L. / Attributions About Perpetrators and Victims of Interpersonal Abuse Results From an Analogue Study. In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2004 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 484-498.
@article{3c9a528e5335410ba31ee671f0268959,
title = "Attributions About Perpetrators and Victims of Interpersonal Abuse Results From an Analogue Study",
abstract = "This analogue study (written vignettes and videotapes) examines the influence of victim-perpetrator relationship (spouse or acquaintance), sex of perceiver, and type of abuse (psychological vs. physical) on attributions about victims and perpetrators of domestic abuse. College student participants (73 men, 108 women) were randomly assigned to condition. As expected, type of relationship influenced observer perceptions. Specifically, participants rated the victim of marital violence as more psychologically damaged and disturbed by the abuse than the victim of acquaintance violence. Furthermore, interaction effects showed that men, more than women, rated the actions of the married perpetrator as more of a victim's rights violation than the actions of the acquaintance perpetrator. Second, type of abuse was shown to influence perceptions of the perpetrator but not the victim. Sex-of-perceiver effects were also obtained. Women held the perpetrator more responsible and assigned less blame to the victim than did men. Legal and clinical implications are then discussed.",
author = "Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling and Shlien-Dellinger, {Rania K.} and Huss, {Matthew T.} and Kramer, {Vertrie L.}",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "484--498",
journal = "Journal of Interpersonal Violence",
issn = "0886-2605",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attributions About Perpetrators and Victims of Interpersonal Abuse Results From an Analogue Study

AU - Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer

AU - Shlien-Dellinger, Rania K.

AU - Huss, Matthew T.

AU - Kramer, Vertrie L.

PY - 2004/4

Y1 - 2004/4

N2 - This analogue study (written vignettes and videotapes) examines the influence of victim-perpetrator relationship (spouse or acquaintance), sex of perceiver, and type of abuse (psychological vs. physical) on attributions about victims and perpetrators of domestic abuse. College student participants (73 men, 108 women) were randomly assigned to condition. As expected, type of relationship influenced observer perceptions. Specifically, participants rated the victim of marital violence as more psychologically damaged and disturbed by the abuse than the victim of acquaintance violence. Furthermore, interaction effects showed that men, more than women, rated the actions of the married perpetrator as more of a victim's rights violation than the actions of the acquaintance perpetrator. Second, type of abuse was shown to influence perceptions of the perpetrator but not the victim. Sex-of-perceiver effects were also obtained. Women held the perpetrator more responsible and assigned less blame to the victim than did men. Legal and clinical implications are then discussed.

AB - This analogue study (written vignettes and videotapes) examines the influence of victim-perpetrator relationship (spouse or acquaintance), sex of perceiver, and type of abuse (psychological vs. physical) on attributions about victims and perpetrators of domestic abuse. College student participants (73 men, 108 women) were randomly assigned to condition. As expected, type of relationship influenced observer perceptions. Specifically, participants rated the victim of marital violence as more psychologically damaged and disturbed by the abuse than the victim of acquaintance violence. Furthermore, interaction effects showed that men, more than women, rated the actions of the married perpetrator as more of a victim's rights violation than the actions of the acquaintance perpetrator. Second, type of abuse was shown to influence perceptions of the perpetrator but not the victim. Sex-of-perceiver effects were also obtained. Women held the perpetrator more responsible and assigned less blame to the victim than did men. Legal and clinical implications are then discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842581433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842581433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 484

EP - 498

JO - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

JF - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

SN - 0886-2605

IS - 4

ER -