Beyond state-centrism

International law and non-state actors in cyberspace

Michael N. Schmitt, Sean Watts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Classically, states and non-state actors were differentiated not only by disparities in legal status, but also by significant imbalances in resources and capabilities. Not surprisingly, international law developed a state-centric bias to account for these imbalances. Cyberspace and cyber operations, however, have closed a number of formerly significant gaps between states' and non-state actors' abilities to compromise international peace and security. In fact, some non-state actors now match, if not exceed, the cyber capabilities of many states in this respect. Where public international law had long proved chiefly relevant to states' interactions with other states, cyber operations by non-state actors increase the frequency with which public international law provides relevant and binding legal rules. This article surveys existing public international law for norms relevant to the cyber interactions of cyber-empowered states and non-state actors. Specifically, the article illustrates how the principles of sovereignty, state responsibility and the jus ad bellum are particularly relevant to States engaged in struggles with non-state actors for security and supremacy in cyberspace.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)595-611
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Conflict and Security Law
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

International law
centrism
virtual reality
international law
public law
legal status
interaction
sovereignty
compromise
peace
responsibility
ability
trend
resources

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Safety Research
  • Law

Cite this

Beyond state-centrism : International law and non-state actors in cyberspace. / Schmitt, Michael N.; Watts, Sean.

In: Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2016, p. 595-611.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{575e58b820b94aa49b7e3cdccbb10876,
title = "Beyond state-centrism: International law and non-state actors in cyberspace",
abstract = "Classically, states and non-state actors were differentiated not only by disparities in legal status, but also by significant imbalances in resources and capabilities. Not surprisingly, international law developed a state-centric bias to account for these imbalances. Cyberspace and cyber operations, however, have closed a number of formerly significant gaps between states' and non-state actors' abilities to compromise international peace and security. In fact, some non-state actors now match, if not exceed, the cyber capabilities of many states in this respect. Where public international law had long proved chiefly relevant to states' interactions with other states, cyber operations by non-state actors increase the frequency with which public international law provides relevant and binding legal rules. This article surveys existing public international law for norms relevant to the cyber interactions of cyber-empowered states and non-state actors. Specifically, the article illustrates how the principles of sovereignty, state responsibility and the jus ad bellum are particularly relevant to States engaged in struggles with non-state actors for security and supremacy in cyberspace.",
author = "Schmitt, {Michael N.} and Sean Watts",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1093/jcsl/krw019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "595--611",
journal = "Journal of Conflict and Security Law",
issn = "1467-7954",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond state-centrism

T2 - International law and non-state actors in cyberspace

AU - Schmitt, Michael N.

AU - Watts, Sean

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Classically, states and non-state actors were differentiated not only by disparities in legal status, but also by significant imbalances in resources and capabilities. Not surprisingly, international law developed a state-centric bias to account for these imbalances. Cyberspace and cyber operations, however, have closed a number of formerly significant gaps between states' and non-state actors' abilities to compromise international peace and security. In fact, some non-state actors now match, if not exceed, the cyber capabilities of many states in this respect. Where public international law had long proved chiefly relevant to states' interactions with other states, cyber operations by non-state actors increase the frequency with which public international law provides relevant and binding legal rules. This article surveys existing public international law for norms relevant to the cyber interactions of cyber-empowered states and non-state actors. Specifically, the article illustrates how the principles of sovereignty, state responsibility and the jus ad bellum are particularly relevant to States engaged in struggles with non-state actors for security and supremacy in cyberspace.

AB - Classically, states and non-state actors were differentiated not only by disparities in legal status, but also by significant imbalances in resources and capabilities. Not surprisingly, international law developed a state-centric bias to account for these imbalances. Cyberspace and cyber operations, however, have closed a number of formerly significant gaps between states' and non-state actors' abilities to compromise international peace and security. In fact, some non-state actors now match, if not exceed, the cyber capabilities of many states in this respect. Where public international law had long proved chiefly relevant to states' interactions with other states, cyber operations by non-state actors increase the frequency with which public international law provides relevant and binding legal rules. This article surveys existing public international law for norms relevant to the cyber interactions of cyber-empowered states and non-state actors. Specifically, the article illustrates how the principles of sovereignty, state responsibility and the jus ad bellum are particularly relevant to States engaged in struggles with non-state actors for security and supremacy in cyberspace.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014606475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014606475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jcsl/krw019

DO - 10.1093/jcsl/krw019

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 595

EP - 611

JO - Journal of Conflict and Security Law

JF - Journal of Conflict and Security Law

SN - 1467-7954

IS - 3

ER -