Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems

Ronald E. Appeldoorn, Terry M. Wilwerding, Wayne W. Barkmeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the mean shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain with the use of eight newer generation repair systems. The range of shear bond strength after 24 hours of water storage was 23.5 ± 5.3 MPa to 12.0 ± 2.3 MPa. After 3 months of water storage and thermocycling, the bond strength range was 20.7 ± 1.7 MPa to 4.2 ± 1.0 MPa. Three of eight systems evaluated did not exhibit a significant (p > 0.05) decrease in bond strength when the 24-hour bond strengths were compared with the 3-month bond strengths. Most specimens failed cohesively in the porcelain at 24 hours, but at 3 months only four of the eight systems showed consistent failures in the porcelain.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-11
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume70
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Dental Porcelain
Composite Resins
Shear Strength
Water

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems. / Appeldoorn, Ronald E.; Wilwerding, Terry M.; Barkmeier, Wayne W.

In: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol. 70, No. 1, 1993, p. 6-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0efd1b8b4d854e34849be53dded5811d,
title = "Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems",
abstract = "A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the mean shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain with the use of eight newer generation repair systems. The range of shear bond strength after 24 hours of water storage was 23.5 ± 5.3 MPa to 12.0 ± 2.3 MPa. After 3 months of water storage and thermocycling, the bond strength range was 20.7 ± 1.7 MPa to 4.2 ± 1.0 MPa. Three of eight systems evaluated did not exhibit a significant (p > 0.05) decrease in bond strength when the 24-hour bond strengths were compared with the 3-month bond strengths. Most specimens failed cohesively in the porcelain at 24 hours, but at 3 months only four of the eight systems showed consistent failures in the porcelain.",
author = "Appeldoorn, {Ronald E.} and Wilwerding, {Terry M.} and Barkmeier, {Wayne W.}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/0022-3913(93)90029-N",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "6--11",
journal = "Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry",
issn = "0022-3913",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems

AU - Appeldoorn, Ronald E.

AU - Wilwerding, Terry M.

AU - Barkmeier, Wayne W.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the mean shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain with the use of eight newer generation repair systems. The range of shear bond strength after 24 hours of water storage was 23.5 ± 5.3 MPa to 12.0 ± 2.3 MPa. After 3 months of water storage and thermocycling, the bond strength range was 20.7 ± 1.7 MPa to 4.2 ± 1.0 MPa. Three of eight systems evaluated did not exhibit a significant (p > 0.05) decrease in bond strength when the 24-hour bond strengths were compared with the 3-month bond strengths. Most specimens failed cohesively in the porcelain at 24 hours, but at 3 months only four of the eight systems showed consistent failures in the porcelain.

AB - A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the mean shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain with the use of eight newer generation repair systems. The range of shear bond strength after 24 hours of water storage was 23.5 ± 5.3 MPa to 12.0 ± 2.3 MPa. After 3 months of water storage and thermocycling, the bond strength range was 20.7 ± 1.7 MPa to 4.2 ± 1.0 MPa. Three of eight systems evaluated did not exhibit a significant (p > 0.05) decrease in bond strength when the 24-hour bond strengths were compared with the 3-month bond strengths. Most specimens failed cohesively in the porcelain at 24 hours, but at 3 months only four of the eight systems showed consistent failures in the porcelain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027637689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027637689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90029-N

DO - 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90029-N

M3 - Article

C2 - 8366459

AN - SCOPUS:0027637689

VL - 70

SP - 6

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

SN - 0022-3913

IS - 1

ER -