Bone Mineral Density Discordance and Exploration of One of its Causes

Robert P. Heaney, K. Michael Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Discordances between hip and spine areal density T-score values are common and incompletely understood. In a cohort of 1157 postmenopausal women, discordances of greater than 10% occurred in 91%, with spine bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores significantly less negative than femoral neck (FN) T-scores (p<0.001). However, when T-scores based on bone mineral content (BMC) rather than BMD were used, the mean discordance was not significantly different from 0. This was largely because BMC at the FN had seemingly declined with age less rapidly than had BMD at that site. This can be explained by age-related areal expansion at the hip, which would be missed in the reported BMD output. One consequence is that if BMC-based T-scores are used to classify patients, substantially fewer individuals would have been judged osteoporotic in this cohort (two-thirds fewer for spine and three-fourths fewer for hip).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)428-433
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Bone Density
Hip
Spine
Femur Neck

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Bone Mineral Density Discordance and Exploration of One of its Causes. / Heaney, Robert P.; Davies, K. Michael.

In: Journal of Clinical Densitometry, Vol. 14, No. 4, 10.2011, p. 428-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heaney, Robert P. ; Davies, K. Michael. / Bone Mineral Density Discordance and Exploration of One of its Causes. In: Journal of Clinical Densitometry. 2011 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 428-433.
@article{c61f7972d63947e88e921c11c91d56f5,
title = "Bone Mineral Density Discordance and Exploration of One of its Causes",
abstract = "Discordances between hip and spine areal density T-score values are common and incompletely understood. In a cohort of 1157 postmenopausal women, discordances of greater than 10{\%} occurred in 91{\%}, with spine bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores significantly less negative than femoral neck (FN) T-scores (p<0.001). However, when T-scores based on bone mineral content (BMC) rather than BMD were used, the mean discordance was not significantly different from 0. This was largely because BMC at the FN had seemingly declined with age less rapidly than had BMD at that site. This can be explained by age-related areal expansion at the hip, which would be missed in the reported BMD output. One consequence is that if BMC-based T-scores are used to classify patients, substantially fewer individuals would have been judged osteoporotic in this cohort (two-thirds fewer for spine and three-fourths fewer for hip).",
author = "Heaney, {Robert P.} and Davies, {K. Michael}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocd.2011.04.009",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "428--433",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Densitometry",
issn = "1094-6950",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bone Mineral Density Discordance and Exploration of One of its Causes

AU - Heaney, Robert P.

AU - Davies, K. Michael

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Discordances between hip and spine areal density T-score values are common and incompletely understood. In a cohort of 1157 postmenopausal women, discordances of greater than 10% occurred in 91%, with spine bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores significantly less negative than femoral neck (FN) T-scores (p<0.001). However, when T-scores based on bone mineral content (BMC) rather than BMD were used, the mean discordance was not significantly different from 0. This was largely because BMC at the FN had seemingly declined with age less rapidly than had BMD at that site. This can be explained by age-related areal expansion at the hip, which would be missed in the reported BMD output. One consequence is that if BMC-based T-scores are used to classify patients, substantially fewer individuals would have been judged osteoporotic in this cohort (two-thirds fewer for spine and three-fourths fewer for hip).

AB - Discordances between hip and spine areal density T-score values are common and incompletely understood. In a cohort of 1157 postmenopausal women, discordances of greater than 10% occurred in 91%, with spine bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores significantly less negative than femoral neck (FN) T-scores (p<0.001). However, when T-scores based on bone mineral content (BMC) rather than BMD were used, the mean discordance was not significantly different from 0. This was largely because BMC at the FN had seemingly declined with age less rapidly than had BMD at that site. This can be explained by age-related areal expansion at the hip, which would be missed in the reported BMD output. One consequence is that if BMC-based T-scores are used to classify patients, substantially fewer individuals would have been judged osteoporotic in this cohort (two-thirds fewer for spine and three-fourths fewer for hip).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82855165171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82855165171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.04.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.04.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 21723767

AN - SCOPUS:82855165171

VL - 14

SP - 428

EP - 433

JO - Journal of Clinical Densitometry

JF - Journal of Clinical Densitometry

SN - 1094-6950

IS - 4

ER -