Characterization of Complementary and Alternative Medicine-Related Consultations in an Academic Drug Information Service

Philip J. Gregory, Mohamed A. Jalloh, Andrew M. Abe, James Hu, Darren J. Hein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize requests received through an academic drug information consultation service related to complementary and alternative medicines. Methods: A retrospective review and descriptive analysis of drug information consultations was conducted. Results: A total of 195 consultations related to complementary and alternative medicine were evaluated. All consultation requests involved questions about dietary supplements. The most common request types were related to safety and tolerability (39%), effectiveness (38%), and therapeutic use (34%). Sixty-eight percent of the requests were from pharmacists. The most frequent consultation requests from pharmacists were questions related to drug interactions (37%), therapeutic use (37%), or stability/compatibility/storage (34%). Nearly 60% of complementary and alternative medicine-related consultation requests were able to be completely addressed using available resources. Among review sources, Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex, and Pharmacist's Letter were the most common resources used to address consultations. Conclusion: Utilization of a drug information service may be a viable option for health care professionals to help answer a complementary and alternative medicine-related question. Additionally, pharmacists and other health care professionals may consider acquiring resources identified to consistently answering these questions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)539-542
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pharmacy Practice
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Drug Information Services
Complementary Therapies
Referral and Consultation
Pharmacists
Therapeutic Uses
Delivery of Health Care
Clinical Pharmacology
Dietary Supplements
Drug Interactions
Databases
Safety

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Characterization of Complementary and Alternative Medicine-Related Consultations in an Academic Drug Information Service. / Gregory, Philip J.; Jalloh, Mohamed A.; Abe, Andrew M.; Hu, James; Hein, Darren J.

In: Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 29, No. 6, 01.12.2016, p. 539-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gregory, Philip J. ; Jalloh, Mohamed A. ; Abe, Andrew M. ; Hu, James ; Hein, Darren J. / Characterization of Complementary and Alternative Medicine-Related Consultations in an Academic Drug Information Service. In: Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2016 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 539-542.
@article{6cc5debd085b43d29a88ba61d9a32af4,
title = "Characterization of Complementary and Alternative Medicine-Related Consultations in an Academic Drug Information Service",
abstract = "Purpose: To characterize requests received through an academic drug information consultation service related to complementary and alternative medicines. Methods: A retrospective review and descriptive analysis of drug information consultations was conducted. Results: A total of 195 consultations related to complementary and alternative medicine were evaluated. All consultation requests involved questions about dietary supplements. The most common request types were related to safety and tolerability (39{\%}), effectiveness (38{\%}), and therapeutic use (34{\%}). Sixty-eight percent of the requests were from pharmacists. The most frequent consultation requests from pharmacists were questions related to drug interactions (37{\%}), therapeutic use (37{\%}), or stability/compatibility/storage (34{\%}). Nearly 60{\%} of complementary and alternative medicine-related consultation requests were able to be completely addressed using available resources. Among review sources, Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex, and Pharmacist's Letter were the most common resources used to address consultations. Conclusion: Utilization of a drug information service may be a viable option for health care professionals to help answer a complementary and alternative medicine-related question. Additionally, pharmacists and other health care professionals may consider acquiring resources identified to consistently answering these questions.",
author = "Gregory, {Philip J.} and Jalloh, {Mohamed A.} and Abe, {Andrew M.} and James Hu and Hein, {Darren J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0897190015579450",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "539--542",
journal = "Journal of Pharmacy Practice",
issn = "0897-1900",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterization of Complementary and Alternative Medicine-Related Consultations in an Academic Drug Information Service

AU - Gregory, Philip J.

AU - Jalloh, Mohamed A.

AU - Abe, Andrew M.

AU - Hu, James

AU - Hein, Darren J.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Purpose: To characterize requests received through an academic drug information consultation service related to complementary and alternative medicines. Methods: A retrospective review and descriptive analysis of drug information consultations was conducted. Results: A total of 195 consultations related to complementary and alternative medicine were evaluated. All consultation requests involved questions about dietary supplements. The most common request types were related to safety and tolerability (39%), effectiveness (38%), and therapeutic use (34%). Sixty-eight percent of the requests were from pharmacists. The most frequent consultation requests from pharmacists were questions related to drug interactions (37%), therapeutic use (37%), or stability/compatibility/storage (34%). Nearly 60% of complementary and alternative medicine-related consultation requests were able to be completely addressed using available resources. Among review sources, Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex, and Pharmacist's Letter were the most common resources used to address consultations. Conclusion: Utilization of a drug information service may be a viable option for health care professionals to help answer a complementary and alternative medicine-related question. Additionally, pharmacists and other health care professionals may consider acquiring resources identified to consistently answering these questions.

AB - Purpose: To characterize requests received through an academic drug information consultation service related to complementary and alternative medicines. Methods: A retrospective review and descriptive analysis of drug information consultations was conducted. Results: A total of 195 consultations related to complementary and alternative medicine were evaluated. All consultation requests involved questions about dietary supplements. The most common request types were related to safety and tolerability (39%), effectiveness (38%), and therapeutic use (34%). Sixty-eight percent of the requests were from pharmacists. The most frequent consultation requests from pharmacists were questions related to drug interactions (37%), therapeutic use (37%), or stability/compatibility/storage (34%). Nearly 60% of complementary and alternative medicine-related consultation requests were able to be completely addressed using available resources. Among review sources, Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, Clinical Pharmacology, Micromedex, and Pharmacist's Letter were the most common resources used to address consultations. Conclusion: Utilization of a drug information service may be a viable option for health care professionals to help answer a complementary and alternative medicine-related question. Additionally, pharmacists and other health care professionals may consider acquiring resources identified to consistently answering these questions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994669313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994669313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0897190015579450

DO - 10.1177/0897190015579450

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 539

EP - 542

JO - Journal of Pharmacy Practice

JF - Journal of Pharmacy Practice

SN - 0897-1900

IS - 6

ER -