Clinical Decision Making About Psychopathy and Violence Risk Assessment in Public Sector Mental Health Settings

Eric B. Elbogen, Matthew T. Huss, Alan J. Tomkins, Mario J. Scalora

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although there has been extensive research on psychopathy, it is unknown how, or whether, clinicians in public sector mental health settings consider the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL) for assessing violence risk. Mental health clinicians (N = 135) from 4 facilities were interviewed by using multiple methods for collecting data on decision making. Participants considered clinical information most often when assessing violence risk, indicating that these data were most readily available. Clinicians perceived formal testing results (e.g., PCL) to be least available and considered testing least often, especially if clinicians had less clinical experience. Participants did not explicitly report using the PCL but did implicitly rely on psychopathy factors when assessing violence risk. Clinicians in crisis settings reported less availability of historical data typically needed for the PCL. The data point to specific ways to improve the clinical practice of violence risk assessment in public mental health settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-141
Number of pages9
JournalPsychological Services
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Public Sector
Checklist
Violence
Mental Health
Decision Making
Public Health
Clinical Decision-Making
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Clinical Decision Making About Psychopathy and Violence Risk Assessment in Public Sector Mental Health Settings. / Elbogen, Eric B.; Huss, Matthew T.; Tomkins, Alan J.; Scalora, Mario J.

In: Psychological Services, Vol. 2, No. 2, 06.2005, p. 133-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5a33c2126cac4a38ab676b566c80df7d,
title = "Clinical Decision Making About Psychopathy and Violence Risk Assessment in Public Sector Mental Health Settings",
abstract = "Although there has been extensive research on psychopathy, it is unknown how, or whether, clinicians in public sector mental health settings consider the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL) for assessing violence risk. Mental health clinicians (N = 135) from 4 facilities were interviewed by using multiple methods for collecting data on decision making. Participants considered clinical information most often when assessing violence risk, indicating that these data were most readily available. Clinicians perceived formal testing results (e.g., PCL) to be least available and considered testing least often, especially if clinicians had less clinical experience. Participants did not explicitly report using the PCL but did implicitly rely on psychopathy factors when assessing violence risk. Clinicians in crisis settings reported less availability of historical data typically needed for the PCL. The data point to specific ways to improve the clinical practice of violence risk assessment in public mental health settings.",
author = "Elbogen, {Eric B.} and Huss, {Matthew T.} and Tomkins, {Alan J.} and Scalora, {Mario J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/1541-1559.2.2.133",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "133--141",
journal = "Psychological Services",
issn = "1541-1559",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical Decision Making About Psychopathy and Violence Risk Assessment in Public Sector Mental Health Settings

AU - Elbogen, Eric B.

AU - Huss, Matthew T.

AU - Tomkins, Alan J.

AU - Scalora, Mario J.

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Although there has been extensive research on psychopathy, it is unknown how, or whether, clinicians in public sector mental health settings consider the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL) for assessing violence risk. Mental health clinicians (N = 135) from 4 facilities were interviewed by using multiple methods for collecting data on decision making. Participants considered clinical information most often when assessing violence risk, indicating that these data were most readily available. Clinicians perceived formal testing results (e.g., PCL) to be least available and considered testing least often, especially if clinicians had less clinical experience. Participants did not explicitly report using the PCL but did implicitly rely on psychopathy factors when assessing violence risk. Clinicians in crisis settings reported less availability of historical data typically needed for the PCL. The data point to specific ways to improve the clinical practice of violence risk assessment in public mental health settings.

AB - Although there has been extensive research on psychopathy, it is unknown how, or whether, clinicians in public sector mental health settings consider the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL) for assessing violence risk. Mental health clinicians (N = 135) from 4 facilities were interviewed by using multiple methods for collecting data on decision making. Participants considered clinical information most often when assessing violence risk, indicating that these data were most readily available. Clinicians perceived formal testing results (e.g., PCL) to be least available and considered testing least often, especially if clinicians had less clinical experience. Participants did not explicitly report using the PCL but did implicitly rely on psychopathy factors when assessing violence risk. Clinicians in crisis settings reported less availability of historical data typically needed for the PCL. The data point to specific ways to improve the clinical practice of violence risk assessment in public mental health settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750203392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750203392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/1541-1559.2.2.133

DO - 10.1037/1541-1559.2.2.133

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33750203392

VL - 2

SP - 133

EP - 141

JO - Psychological Services

JF - Psychological Services

SN - 1541-1559

IS - 2

ER -