Comparison of dentin bond durability of a universal adhesive and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems

Mami Kawazu, Toshiki Takamizawa, Eizo Hirokane, Akimasa Tsujimoto, Tomohiko Tamura, Wayne W. Barkmeier, Mark A. Latta, Masashi Miyazaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare dentin bond durability under different degradation conditions between two etch-and-rinse (ER) systems and a universal adhesive in ER mode. Method: This study used a universal adhesive [Scotchbond Universal (SU)], a three-step ER adhesive [Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SM)], and a two-step ER adhesive [Single Bond Plus (SB)]. A phosphoric acid-etching agent was applied to bovine dentin prior to the application of either a primer or the adhesive. After acid etching, bonding procedures were conducted. The specimens were divided into three group classes: (1) subjected to 10,000, 30,000, or 50,000 thermal cycles (TC); (2) stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 6 months or 1 year (WS); and (3) stored in distilled water for 24 h (baseline). Shear bond strength (SBS) tests were conducted. Results: SB showed a higher baseline SBS than the other adhesives. Defining the baseline SBS value for each adhesive system as 100%, TC groups ranged from 56.1 to 70.3% for SM, from 98.4 to 103.7% for SB, and from 120.3 to 126.7% for SU. WS groups ranged from 66.2 to 71.4% for SM, from 98.1 to 103.3% for SB, and from 102.5 to 118.1% for SU. Conclusions: Although SB showed relatively stable dentin bond performance under all degradation conditions, SM showed decreased dentin SBS with prolonged degradation. SU did not show any significant decrease in SBS from the baseline under any degradation condition. Clinical relevance: The universal adhesive showed comparable adhesive performance with the two-step ER adhesive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalClinical Oral Investigations
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Dentin
Adhesives
Shear Strength
Hot Temperature
Water
Single Bond Plus
Acids
Scotchbond
Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Comparison of dentin bond durability of a universal adhesive and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. / Kawazu, Mami; Takamizawa, Toshiki; Hirokane, Eizo; Tsujimoto, Akimasa; Tamura, Tomohiko; Barkmeier, Wayne W.; Latta, Mark A.; Miyazaki, Masashi.

In: Clinical Oral Investigations, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kawazu, Mami ; Takamizawa, Toshiki ; Hirokane, Eizo ; Tsujimoto, Akimasa ; Tamura, Tomohiko ; Barkmeier, Wayne W. ; Latta, Mark A. ; Miyazaki, Masashi. / Comparison of dentin bond durability of a universal adhesive and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. In: Clinical Oral Investigations. 2019.
@article{f6ed89364b8f40d28e68c3adfd71b018,
title = "Comparison of dentin bond durability of a universal adhesive and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems",
abstract = "Objective: This study aimed to compare dentin bond durability under different degradation conditions between two etch-and-rinse (ER) systems and a universal adhesive in ER mode. Method: This study used a universal adhesive [Scotchbond Universal (SU)], a three-step ER adhesive [Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SM)], and a two-step ER adhesive [Single Bond Plus (SB)]. A phosphoric acid-etching agent was applied to bovine dentin prior to the application of either a primer or the adhesive. After acid etching, bonding procedures were conducted. The specimens were divided into three group classes: (1) subjected to 10,000, 30,000, or 50,000 thermal cycles (TC); (2) stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 6 months or 1 year (WS); and (3) stored in distilled water for 24 h (baseline). Shear bond strength (SBS) tests were conducted. Results: SB showed a higher baseline SBS than the other adhesives. Defining the baseline SBS value for each adhesive system as 100{\%}, TC groups ranged from 56.1 to 70.3{\%} for SM, from 98.4 to 103.7{\%} for SB, and from 120.3 to 126.7{\%} for SU. WS groups ranged from 66.2 to 71.4{\%} for SM, from 98.1 to 103.3{\%} for SB, and from 102.5 to 118.1{\%} for SU. Conclusions: Although SB showed relatively stable dentin bond performance under all degradation conditions, SM showed decreased dentin SBS with prolonged degradation. SU did not show any significant decrease in SBS from the baseline under any degradation condition. Clinical relevance: The universal adhesive showed comparable adhesive performance with the two-step ER adhesive.",
author = "Mami Kawazu and Toshiki Takamizawa and Eizo Hirokane and Akimasa Tsujimoto and Tomohiko Tamura and Barkmeier, {Wayne W.} and Latta, {Mark A.} and Masashi Miyazaki",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00784-019-03153-y",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Clinical Oral Investigations",
issn = "1432-6981",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of dentin bond durability of a universal adhesive and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems

AU - Kawazu, Mami

AU - Takamizawa, Toshiki

AU - Hirokane, Eizo

AU - Tsujimoto, Akimasa

AU - Tamura, Tomohiko

AU - Barkmeier, Wayne W.

AU - Latta, Mark A.

AU - Miyazaki, Masashi

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: This study aimed to compare dentin bond durability under different degradation conditions between two etch-and-rinse (ER) systems and a universal adhesive in ER mode. Method: This study used a universal adhesive [Scotchbond Universal (SU)], a three-step ER adhesive [Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SM)], and a two-step ER adhesive [Single Bond Plus (SB)]. A phosphoric acid-etching agent was applied to bovine dentin prior to the application of either a primer or the adhesive. After acid etching, bonding procedures were conducted. The specimens were divided into three group classes: (1) subjected to 10,000, 30,000, or 50,000 thermal cycles (TC); (2) stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 6 months or 1 year (WS); and (3) stored in distilled water for 24 h (baseline). Shear bond strength (SBS) tests were conducted. Results: SB showed a higher baseline SBS than the other adhesives. Defining the baseline SBS value for each adhesive system as 100%, TC groups ranged from 56.1 to 70.3% for SM, from 98.4 to 103.7% for SB, and from 120.3 to 126.7% for SU. WS groups ranged from 66.2 to 71.4% for SM, from 98.1 to 103.3% for SB, and from 102.5 to 118.1% for SU. Conclusions: Although SB showed relatively stable dentin bond performance under all degradation conditions, SM showed decreased dentin SBS with prolonged degradation. SU did not show any significant decrease in SBS from the baseline under any degradation condition. Clinical relevance: The universal adhesive showed comparable adhesive performance with the two-step ER adhesive.

AB - Objective: This study aimed to compare dentin bond durability under different degradation conditions between two etch-and-rinse (ER) systems and a universal adhesive in ER mode. Method: This study used a universal adhesive [Scotchbond Universal (SU)], a three-step ER adhesive [Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SM)], and a two-step ER adhesive [Single Bond Plus (SB)]. A phosphoric acid-etching agent was applied to bovine dentin prior to the application of either a primer or the adhesive. After acid etching, bonding procedures were conducted. The specimens were divided into three group classes: (1) subjected to 10,000, 30,000, or 50,000 thermal cycles (TC); (2) stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 6 months or 1 year (WS); and (3) stored in distilled water for 24 h (baseline). Shear bond strength (SBS) tests were conducted. Results: SB showed a higher baseline SBS than the other adhesives. Defining the baseline SBS value for each adhesive system as 100%, TC groups ranged from 56.1 to 70.3% for SM, from 98.4 to 103.7% for SB, and from 120.3 to 126.7% for SU. WS groups ranged from 66.2 to 71.4% for SM, from 98.1 to 103.3% for SB, and from 102.5 to 118.1% for SU. Conclusions: Although SB showed relatively stable dentin bond performance under all degradation conditions, SM showed decreased dentin SBS with prolonged degradation. SU did not show any significant decrease in SBS from the baseline under any degradation condition. Clinical relevance: The universal adhesive showed comparable adhesive performance with the two-step ER adhesive.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075290757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075290757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00784-019-03153-y

DO - 10.1007/s00784-019-03153-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075290757

JO - Clinical Oral Investigations

JF - Clinical Oral Investigations

SN - 1432-6981

ER -