Comparison of dilated fundus examinations with seven-field stereo fundus photographs in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial

Nicholas Emanuele, Ronald Klein, Thomas Moritz, Matthew D. Davis, Kathleen Glander, Robert J. Anderson, Domenic Reda, William Duckworth, Carlos Abraira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) is a 20-medical center, prospective, randomized study of 1792 Type 2 diabetic individuals primarily aimed at determining whether intensive glycemic control prevents macrovascular events. We report a comparison of fundus photographs and ophthalmologic examination at baseline, permitting an evaluation of multiple settings similar to common clinical practice. Research Design and Methods: A 340-patient subset had both local dilated fundus examinations and centrally read seven-field stereo fundus photographs completed within 60 days of each other (median 28 days). Local examiners were unaware of the stereo photographs. Results: Overall, agreement within one step was 76% and exact agreement between ophthalmoscopy and central gradings of fundus photographs on a five-step retinopathy severity scale was 43% (weighted kappa 0.42, CI 0.35-0.48). In about 90% of disagreements the severity level was higher by photographic grading. The sensitivity for ophthalmoscopy compared to grading of fundus photographs for the detection of any retinopathy was 51% and specificity was 91%. For proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), sensitivity was 61% and specificity 98%. Only one eye was high-risk PDR, and it was detected by both methods. For clinically significant macular edema, these measures were 24% and 98%, respectively. The disagreements were of possible clinical importance in three cases (

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-329
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Diabetes and its Complications
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ophthalmoscopy
Veterans
Diabetic Retinopathy
Macular Edema
Research Design
Prospective Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Endocrinology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of dilated fundus examinations with seven-field stereo fundus photographs in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial. / Emanuele, Nicholas; Klein, Ronald; Moritz, Thomas; Davis, Matthew D.; Glander, Kathleen; Anderson, Robert J.; Reda, Domenic; Duckworth, William; Abraira, Carlos.

In: Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, Vol. 23, No. 5, 09.2009, p. 323-329.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Emanuele, Nicholas ; Klein, Ronald ; Moritz, Thomas ; Davis, Matthew D. ; Glander, Kathleen ; Anderson, Robert J. ; Reda, Domenic ; Duckworth, William ; Abraira, Carlos. / Comparison of dilated fundus examinations with seven-field stereo fundus photographs in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial. In: Journal of Diabetes and its Complications. 2009 ; Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 323-329.
@article{c4d7f888f9e04d6384bac366d07364c4,
title = "Comparison of dilated fundus examinations with seven-field stereo fundus photographs in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial",
abstract = "Objective: The Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) is a 20-medical center, prospective, randomized study of 1792 Type 2 diabetic individuals primarily aimed at determining whether intensive glycemic control prevents macrovascular events. We report a comparison of fundus photographs and ophthalmologic examination at baseline, permitting an evaluation of multiple settings similar to common clinical practice. Research Design and Methods: A 340-patient subset had both local dilated fundus examinations and centrally read seven-field stereo fundus photographs completed within 60 days of each other (median 28 days). Local examiners were unaware of the stereo photographs. Results: Overall, agreement within one step was 76{\%} and exact agreement between ophthalmoscopy and central gradings of fundus photographs on a five-step retinopathy severity scale was 43{\%} (weighted kappa 0.42, CI 0.35-0.48). In about 90{\%} of disagreements the severity level was higher by photographic grading. The sensitivity for ophthalmoscopy compared to grading of fundus photographs for the detection of any retinopathy was 51{\%} and specificity was 91{\%}. For proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), sensitivity was 61{\%} and specificity 98{\%}. Only one eye was high-risk PDR, and it was detected by both methods. For clinically significant macular edema, these measures were 24{\%} and 98{\%}, respectively. The disagreements were of possible clinical importance in three cases (",
author = "Nicholas Emanuele and Ronald Klein and Thomas Moritz and Davis, {Matthew D.} and Kathleen Glander and Anderson, {Robert J.} and Domenic Reda and William Duckworth and Carlos Abraira",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.02.010",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "323--329",
journal = "Journal of Diabetes and its Complications",
issn = "1056-8727",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of dilated fundus examinations with seven-field stereo fundus photographs in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial

AU - Emanuele, Nicholas

AU - Klein, Ronald

AU - Moritz, Thomas

AU - Davis, Matthew D.

AU - Glander, Kathleen

AU - Anderson, Robert J.

AU - Reda, Domenic

AU - Duckworth, William

AU - Abraira, Carlos

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Objective: The Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) is a 20-medical center, prospective, randomized study of 1792 Type 2 diabetic individuals primarily aimed at determining whether intensive glycemic control prevents macrovascular events. We report a comparison of fundus photographs and ophthalmologic examination at baseline, permitting an evaluation of multiple settings similar to common clinical practice. Research Design and Methods: A 340-patient subset had both local dilated fundus examinations and centrally read seven-field stereo fundus photographs completed within 60 days of each other (median 28 days). Local examiners were unaware of the stereo photographs. Results: Overall, agreement within one step was 76% and exact agreement between ophthalmoscopy and central gradings of fundus photographs on a five-step retinopathy severity scale was 43% (weighted kappa 0.42, CI 0.35-0.48). In about 90% of disagreements the severity level was higher by photographic grading. The sensitivity for ophthalmoscopy compared to grading of fundus photographs for the detection of any retinopathy was 51% and specificity was 91%. For proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), sensitivity was 61% and specificity 98%. Only one eye was high-risk PDR, and it was detected by both methods. For clinically significant macular edema, these measures were 24% and 98%, respectively. The disagreements were of possible clinical importance in three cases (

AB - Objective: The Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) is a 20-medical center, prospective, randomized study of 1792 Type 2 diabetic individuals primarily aimed at determining whether intensive glycemic control prevents macrovascular events. We report a comparison of fundus photographs and ophthalmologic examination at baseline, permitting an evaluation of multiple settings similar to common clinical practice. Research Design and Methods: A 340-patient subset had both local dilated fundus examinations and centrally read seven-field stereo fundus photographs completed within 60 days of each other (median 28 days). Local examiners were unaware of the stereo photographs. Results: Overall, agreement within one step was 76% and exact agreement between ophthalmoscopy and central gradings of fundus photographs on a five-step retinopathy severity scale was 43% (weighted kappa 0.42, CI 0.35-0.48). In about 90% of disagreements the severity level was higher by photographic grading. The sensitivity for ophthalmoscopy compared to grading of fundus photographs for the detection of any retinopathy was 51% and specificity was 91%. For proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), sensitivity was 61% and specificity 98%. Only one eye was high-risk PDR, and it was detected by both methods. For clinically significant macular edema, these measures were 24% and 98%, respectively. The disagreements were of possible clinical importance in three cases (

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69249114696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69249114696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.02.010

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 323

EP - 329

JO - Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

JF - Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

SN - 1056-8727

IS - 5

ER -