Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in self-etch mode

Akimasa Tsujimoto, Wayne W. Barkmeier, Hosoya Yumiko, Kie Nojiri, Nagura Yuko, Toshiki Takamizawa, Mark A. Latta, Masashi Miyazaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To comparatively evaluate universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives for enamel bond fatigue durability in self-etch mode. Methods: Three universal adhesives (Clearfil Universal Bond; G-Premio Bond; Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) and three two-step self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond; Clearfil SE Bond 2; OptiBond XTR) were used. The initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of the adhesive to enamel in self-etch mode were determined. Results: The initial shear bond strengths of the universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was significantly lower than those of two-step self-etch adhesives and initial shear bond strengths were not influenced by type of adhesive in each adhesive category. The shear fatigue strengths of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode were significantly lower than that of Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, but similar to that OptiBond XTR. Unlike two-step self-etch adhesives, the initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was not influenced by the type of adhesive. (Am J Dent 2017;30:279-284). Clinical significance: This laboratory study showed that the enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives was lower than Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, similar to Optibond XTR, and was not influenced by type of adhesive, unlike two-step self-etch adhesives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-284
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Dentistry
Volume30
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Dental Enamel
Adhesives
Fatigue
Shear Strength
Clearfil SE Bond

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Tsujimoto, A., Barkmeier, W. W., Yumiko, H., Nojiri, K., Yuko, N., Takamizawa, T., ... Miyazaki, M. (2017). Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in self-etch mode. American Journal of Dentistry, 30(5), 279-284.

Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in self-etch mode. / Tsujimoto, Akimasa; Barkmeier, Wayne W.; Yumiko, Hosoya; Nojiri, Kie; Yuko, Nagura; Takamizawa, Toshiki; Latta, Mark A.; Miyazaki, Masashi.

In: American Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 30, No. 5, 01.10.2017, p. 279-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsujimoto, Akimasa ; Barkmeier, Wayne W. ; Yumiko, Hosoya ; Nojiri, Kie ; Yuko, Nagura ; Takamizawa, Toshiki ; Latta, Mark A. ; Miyazaki, Masashi. / Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in self-etch mode. In: American Journal of Dentistry. 2017 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 279-284.
@article{6a3bc25151f34700b893f03bed3d40ce,
title = "Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in self-etch mode",
abstract = "Purpose: To comparatively evaluate universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives for enamel bond fatigue durability in self-etch mode. Methods: Three universal adhesives (Clearfil Universal Bond; G-Premio Bond; Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) and three two-step self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond; Clearfil SE Bond 2; OptiBond XTR) were used. The initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of the adhesive to enamel in self-etch mode were determined. Results: The initial shear bond strengths of the universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was significantly lower than those of two-step self-etch adhesives and initial shear bond strengths were not influenced by type of adhesive in each adhesive category. The shear fatigue strengths of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode were significantly lower than that of Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, but similar to that OptiBond XTR. Unlike two-step self-etch adhesives, the initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was not influenced by the type of adhesive. (Am J Dent 2017;30:279-284). Clinical significance: This laboratory study showed that the enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives was lower than Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, similar to Optibond XTR, and was not influenced by type of adhesive, unlike two-step self-etch adhesives.",
author = "Akimasa Tsujimoto and Barkmeier, {Wayne W.} and Hosoya Yumiko and Kie Nojiri and Nagura Yuko and Toshiki Takamizawa and Latta, {Mark A.} and Masashi Miyazaki",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "279--284",
journal = "American Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0894-8275",
publisher = "Mosher and Linder, Inc",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in self-etch mode

AU - Tsujimoto, Akimasa

AU - Barkmeier, Wayne W.

AU - Yumiko, Hosoya

AU - Nojiri, Kie

AU - Yuko, Nagura

AU - Takamizawa, Toshiki

AU - Latta, Mark A.

AU - Miyazaki, Masashi

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Purpose: To comparatively evaluate universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives for enamel bond fatigue durability in self-etch mode. Methods: Three universal adhesives (Clearfil Universal Bond; G-Premio Bond; Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) and three two-step self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond; Clearfil SE Bond 2; OptiBond XTR) were used. The initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of the adhesive to enamel in self-etch mode were determined. Results: The initial shear bond strengths of the universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was significantly lower than those of two-step self-etch adhesives and initial shear bond strengths were not influenced by type of adhesive in each adhesive category. The shear fatigue strengths of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode were significantly lower than that of Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, but similar to that OptiBond XTR. Unlike two-step self-etch adhesives, the initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was not influenced by the type of adhesive. (Am J Dent 2017;30:279-284). Clinical significance: This laboratory study showed that the enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives was lower than Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, similar to Optibond XTR, and was not influenced by type of adhesive, unlike two-step self-etch adhesives.

AB - Purpose: To comparatively evaluate universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives for enamel bond fatigue durability in self-etch mode. Methods: Three universal adhesives (Clearfil Universal Bond; G-Premio Bond; Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) and three two-step self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond; Clearfil SE Bond 2; OptiBond XTR) were used. The initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of the adhesive to enamel in self-etch mode were determined. Results: The initial shear bond strengths of the universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was significantly lower than those of two-step self-etch adhesives and initial shear bond strengths were not influenced by type of adhesive in each adhesive category. The shear fatigue strengths of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode were significantly lower than that of Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, but similar to that OptiBond XTR. Unlike two-step self-etch adhesives, the initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was not influenced by the type of adhesive. (Am J Dent 2017;30:279-284). Clinical significance: This laboratory study showed that the enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives was lower than Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, similar to Optibond XTR, and was not influenced by type of adhesive, unlike two-step self-etch adhesives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034090406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034090406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 279

EP - 284

JO - American Journal of Dentistry

JF - American Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0894-8275

IS - 5

ER -