Abstract
Purpose: To comparatively evaluate universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives for enamel bond fatigue durability in self-etch mode. Methods: Three universal adhesives (Clearfil Universal Bond; G-Premio Bond; Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) and three two-step self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond; Clearfil SE Bond 2; OptiBond XTR) were used. The initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of the adhesive to enamel in self-etch mode were determined. Results: The initial shear bond strengths of the universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was significantly lower than those of two-step self-etch adhesives and initial shear bond strengths were not influenced by type of adhesive in each adhesive category. The shear fatigue strengths of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode were significantly lower than that of Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, but similar to that OptiBond XTR. Unlike two-step self-etch adhesives, the initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was not influenced by the type of adhesive. (Am J Dent 2017;30:279-284). Clinical significance: This laboratory study showed that the enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives was lower than Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, similar to Optibond XTR, and was not influenced by type of adhesive, unlike two-step self-etch adhesives.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 279-284 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | American Journal of Dentistry |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| State | Published - Oct 1 2017 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Dentistry(all)
Cite this
Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in self-etch mode. / Tsujimoto, Akimasa; Barkmeier, Wayne W.; Yumiko, Hosoya; Nojiri, Kie; Yuko, Nagura; Takamizawa, Toshiki; Latta, Mark A.; Miyazaki, Masashi.
In: American Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 30, No. 5, 01.10.2017, p. 279-284.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives in self-etch mode
AU - Tsujimoto, Akimasa
AU - Barkmeier, Wayne W.
AU - Yumiko, Hosoya
AU - Nojiri, Kie
AU - Yuko, Nagura
AU - Takamizawa, Toshiki
AU - Latta, Mark A.
AU - Miyazaki, Masashi
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - Purpose: To comparatively evaluate universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives for enamel bond fatigue durability in self-etch mode. Methods: Three universal adhesives (Clearfil Universal Bond; G-Premio Bond; Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) and three two-step self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond; Clearfil SE Bond 2; OptiBond XTR) were used. The initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of the adhesive to enamel in self-etch mode were determined. Results: The initial shear bond strengths of the universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was significantly lower than those of two-step self-etch adhesives and initial shear bond strengths were not influenced by type of adhesive in each adhesive category. The shear fatigue strengths of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode were significantly lower than that of Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, but similar to that OptiBond XTR. Unlike two-step self-etch adhesives, the initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was not influenced by the type of adhesive. (Am J Dent 2017;30:279-284). Clinical significance: This laboratory study showed that the enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives was lower than Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, similar to Optibond XTR, and was not influenced by type of adhesive, unlike two-step self-etch adhesives.
AB - Purpose: To comparatively evaluate universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives for enamel bond fatigue durability in self-etch mode. Methods: Three universal adhesives (Clearfil Universal Bond; G-Premio Bond; Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) and three two-step self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond; Clearfil SE Bond 2; OptiBond XTR) were used. The initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of the adhesive to enamel in self-etch mode were determined. Results: The initial shear bond strengths of the universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was significantly lower than those of two-step self-etch adhesives and initial shear bond strengths were not influenced by type of adhesive in each adhesive category. The shear fatigue strengths of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode were significantly lower than that of Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, but similar to that OptiBond XTR. Unlike two-step self-etch adhesives, the initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode was not influenced by the type of adhesive. (Am J Dent 2017;30:279-284). Clinical significance: This laboratory study showed that the enamel bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives was lower than Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2, similar to Optibond XTR, and was not influenced by type of adhesive, unlike two-step self-etch adhesives.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034090406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034090406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 29178732
AN - SCOPUS:85034090406
VL - 30
SP - 279
EP - 284
JO - American Journal of Dentistry
JF - American Journal of Dentistry
SN - 0894-8275
IS - 5
ER -