Comparison of methods of teaching children proper lifting techniques

S. M. Spence, Gail Jensen, K. F. Shepard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the effects of two teaching methods on children's ability to demonstrate and recall their mastery of proper lifting techniques. Seventy-six third and fifth grade public school children were divided by grade into three groups. Two of the groups (experimental) were taught the correct method for lifting a heavy object, either by lecture demonstration or guided discovery teaching format; one group (control) was not taught. The students' knowledge was measured pretest, one-week posttest, and eight-week posttest with a written and practical test. The students in the experimental groups in both grades significantly (P ≤ .001) increased their scores on the written portion of the test over those of the control groups on the one-week posttest. No group, however, showed significant gains on the practical portion. No differences were found between teaching methods. Results of this study stress the importance of evaluating verbally learned motor skills in a practical application format in school settings and in clinical patient education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1055-1061
Number of pages7
JournalPhysical Therapy
Volume64
Issue number7
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Teaching
Students
Control Groups
Motor Skills
Aptitude
Patient Education

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Comparison of methods of teaching children proper lifting techniques. / Spence, S. M.; Jensen, Gail; Shepard, K. F.

In: Physical Therapy, Vol. 64, No. 7, 1984, p. 1055-1061.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Spence, SM, Jensen, G & Shepard, KF 1984, 'Comparison of methods of teaching children proper lifting techniques', Physical Therapy, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 1055-1061.
Spence, S. M. ; Jensen, Gail ; Shepard, K. F. / Comparison of methods of teaching children proper lifting techniques. In: Physical Therapy. 1984 ; Vol. 64, No. 7. pp. 1055-1061.
@article{1ce2ecfb62da40faa762418e48d3614a,
title = "Comparison of methods of teaching children proper lifting techniques",
abstract = "This study was designed to determine the effects of two teaching methods on children's ability to demonstrate and recall their mastery of proper lifting techniques. Seventy-six third and fifth grade public school children were divided by grade into three groups. Two of the groups (experimental) were taught the correct method for lifting a heavy object, either by lecture demonstration or guided discovery teaching format; one group (control) was not taught. The students' knowledge was measured pretest, one-week posttest, and eight-week posttest with a written and practical test. The students in the experimental groups in both grades significantly (P ≤ .001) increased their scores on the written portion of the test over those of the control groups on the one-week posttest. No group, however, showed significant gains on the practical portion. No differences were found between teaching methods. Results of this study stress the importance of evaluating verbally learned motor skills in a practical application format in school settings and in clinical patient education.",
author = "Spence, {S. M.} and Gail Jensen and Shepard, {K. F.}",
year = "1984",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "1055--1061",
journal = "Physical Therapy",
issn = "0031-9023",
publisher = "American Physical Therapy Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of methods of teaching children proper lifting techniques

AU - Spence, S. M.

AU - Jensen, Gail

AU - Shepard, K. F.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - This study was designed to determine the effects of two teaching methods on children's ability to demonstrate and recall their mastery of proper lifting techniques. Seventy-six third and fifth grade public school children were divided by grade into three groups. Two of the groups (experimental) were taught the correct method for lifting a heavy object, either by lecture demonstration or guided discovery teaching format; one group (control) was not taught. The students' knowledge was measured pretest, one-week posttest, and eight-week posttest with a written and practical test. The students in the experimental groups in both grades significantly (P ≤ .001) increased their scores on the written portion of the test over those of the control groups on the one-week posttest. No group, however, showed significant gains on the practical portion. No differences were found between teaching methods. Results of this study stress the importance of evaluating verbally learned motor skills in a practical application format in school settings and in clinical patient education.

AB - This study was designed to determine the effects of two teaching methods on children's ability to demonstrate and recall their mastery of proper lifting techniques. Seventy-six third and fifth grade public school children were divided by grade into three groups. Two of the groups (experimental) were taught the correct method for lifting a heavy object, either by lecture demonstration or guided discovery teaching format; one group (control) was not taught. The students' knowledge was measured pretest, one-week posttest, and eight-week posttest with a written and practical test. The students in the experimental groups in both grades significantly (P ≤ .001) increased their scores on the written portion of the test over those of the control groups on the one-week posttest. No group, however, showed significant gains on the practical portion. No differences were found between teaching methods. Results of this study stress the importance of evaluating verbally learned motor skills in a practical application format in school settings and in clinical patient education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021242142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021242142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 1055

EP - 1061

JO - Physical Therapy

JF - Physical Therapy

SN - 0031-9023

IS - 7

ER -