Comparison of muscarinic and beta adrenergic receptors between bovine peripheral lung and tracheal smooth muscles

A striking difference in the receptor concentration

John B. Cheng, Robert G. Townley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare the activity of muscarinic and beta adrenergic receptors in bovine peripheral lung to the corresponding receptor activity in tracheal smooth muscle. We used [3H] quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB) and [3H]dihydroalprenolol (DHA) to measure muscarinic and beta receptor activity, respectively. Binding to QNB and DHA at 25°C was rapid, reversible, saturable and of high affinity. The order of potency for cholinergic and adrenergic agents competing for binding was compatible with muscarinic and beta2 adrenergic potencies. We found that the concentration of muscarinic receptor binding sites was 37-fold greater in the tracheal muscle preparation (2805 ± 309 fmol/mg protein) than in the peripheral lung preparation (76 ± 28 fmol/mg protein). Unlike muscarinic receptors, the lung contained 8-fold higher concentration of the beta adrenergic receptors than did the tracheal muscle (1588 ± 417 vs. 199 ± 42 fmol/mg protein). The dissociation constant or the agonist's inhibitory constant (Ki) for either receptor binding sites, however, was not significantly different between the two tissues. Furthermore, in vitro contraction studies showed that the response of tracheal muscle strips to methacholine was markedly greater than the response of peripheral lung strips, a finding consistent with the QNB binding result. The muscle but not the peripheral lung strip exhibited a relaxing response to epinephrine. Our data indicate a striking quantitative difference in muscarinic and beta adrenergic receptors between lung tissue and tracheal muscle, and that each receptor in the lung is qualitatively similar to the corresponding receptor in the muscle.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2079-2086
Number of pages8
JournalLife Sciences
Volume30
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 14 1982

Fingerprint

Receptors, Adrenergic, beta
Cholinergic Agents
Smooth Muscle
Muscle
Lung
Quinuclidinyl Benzilate
Muscles
Muscarinic Receptors
Dihydroalprenolol
Adrenergic Agents
Binding Sites
Tissue
Proteins
Methacholine Chloride
Epinephrine

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Comparison of muscarinic and beta adrenergic receptors between bovine peripheral lung and tracheal smooth muscles : A striking difference in the receptor concentration. / Cheng, John B.; Townley, Robert G.

In: Life Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 24, 14.06.1982, p. 2079-2086.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eebd1fec673b47d8a4a20fac20bb6439,
title = "Comparison of muscarinic and beta adrenergic receptors between bovine peripheral lung and tracheal smooth muscles: A striking difference in the receptor concentration",
abstract = "This study was undertaken to compare the activity of muscarinic and beta adrenergic receptors in bovine peripheral lung to the corresponding receptor activity in tracheal smooth muscle. We used [3H] quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB) and [3H]dihydroalprenolol (DHA) to measure muscarinic and beta receptor activity, respectively. Binding to QNB and DHA at 25°C was rapid, reversible, saturable and of high affinity. The order of potency for cholinergic and adrenergic agents competing for binding was compatible with muscarinic and beta2 adrenergic potencies. We found that the concentration of muscarinic receptor binding sites was 37-fold greater in the tracheal muscle preparation (2805 ± 309 fmol/mg protein) than in the peripheral lung preparation (76 ± 28 fmol/mg protein). Unlike muscarinic receptors, the lung contained 8-fold higher concentration of the beta adrenergic receptors than did the tracheal muscle (1588 ± 417 vs. 199 ± 42 fmol/mg protein). The dissociation constant or the agonist's inhibitory constant (Ki) for either receptor binding sites, however, was not significantly different between the two tissues. Furthermore, in vitro contraction studies showed that the response of tracheal muscle strips to methacholine was markedly greater than the response of peripheral lung strips, a finding consistent with the QNB binding result. The muscle but not the peripheral lung strip exhibited a relaxing response to epinephrine. Our data indicate a striking quantitative difference in muscarinic and beta adrenergic receptors between lung tissue and tracheal muscle, and that each receptor in the lung is qualitatively similar to the corresponding receptor in the muscle.",
author = "Cheng, {John B.} and Townley, {Robert G.}",
year = "1982",
month = "6",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1016/0024-3205(82)90449-0",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "2079--2086",
journal = "Life Sciences",
issn = "0024-3205",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "24",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of muscarinic and beta adrenergic receptors between bovine peripheral lung and tracheal smooth muscles

T2 - A striking difference in the receptor concentration

AU - Cheng, John B.

AU - Townley, Robert G.

PY - 1982/6/14

Y1 - 1982/6/14

N2 - This study was undertaken to compare the activity of muscarinic and beta adrenergic receptors in bovine peripheral lung to the corresponding receptor activity in tracheal smooth muscle. We used [3H] quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB) and [3H]dihydroalprenolol (DHA) to measure muscarinic and beta receptor activity, respectively. Binding to QNB and DHA at 25°C was rapid, reversible, saturable and of high affinity. The order of potency for cholinergic and adrenergic agents competing for binding was compatible with muscarinic and beta2 adrenergic potencies. We found that the concentration of muscarinic receptor binding sites was 37-fold greater in the tracheal muscle preparation (2805 ± 309 fmol/mg protein) than in the peripheral lung preparation (76 ± 28 fmol/mg protein). Unlike muscarinic receptors, the lung contained 8-fold higher concentration of the beta adrenergic receptors than did the tracheal muscle (1588 ± 417 vs. 199 ± 42 fmol/mg protein). The dissociation constant or the agonist's inhibitory constant (Ki) for either receptor binding sites, however, was not significantly different between the two tissues. Furthermore, in vitro contraction studies showed that the response of tracheal muscle strips to methacholine was markedly greater than the response of peripheral lung strips, a finding consistent with the QNB binding result. The muscle but not the peripheral lung strip exhibited a relaxing response to epinephrine. Our data indicate a striking quantitative difference in muscarinic and beta adrenergic receptors between lung tissue and tracheal muscle, and that each receptor in the lung is qualitatively similar to the corresponding receptor in the muscle.

AB - This study was undertaken to compare the activity of muscarinic and beta adrenergic receptors in bovine peripheral lung to the corresponding receptor activity in tracheal smooth muscle. We used [3H] quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB) and [3H]dihydroalprenolol (DHA) to measure muscarinic and beta receptor activity, respectively. Binding to QNB and DHA at 25°C was rapid, reversible, saturable and of high affinity. The order of potency for cholinergic and adrenergic agents competing for binding was compatible with muscarinic and beta2 adrenergic potencies. We found that the concentration of muscarinic receptor binding sites was 37-fold greater in the tracheal muscle preparation (2805 ± 309 fmol/mg protein) than in the peripheral lung preparation (76 ± 28 fmol/mg protein). Unlike muscarinic receptors, the lung contained 8-fold higher concentration of the beta adrenergic receptors than did the tracheal muscle (1588 ± 417 vs. 199 ± 42 fmol/mg protein). The dissociation constant or the agonist's inhibitory constant (Ki) for either receptor binding sites, however, was not significantly different between the two tissues. Furthermore, in vitro contraction studies showed that the response of tracheal muscle strips to methacholine was markedly greater than the response of peripheral lung strips, a finding consistent with the QNB binding result. The muscle but not the peripheral lung strip exhibited a relaxing response to epinephrine. Our data indicate a striking quantitative difference in muscarinic and beta adrenergic receptors between lung tissue and tracheal muscle, and that each receptor in the lung is qualitatively similar to the corresponding receptor in the muscle.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019950780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019950780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0024-3205(82)90449-0

DO - 10.1016/0024-3205(82)90449-0

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 2079

EP - 2086

JO - Life Sciences

JF - Life Sciences

SN - 0024-3205

IS - 24

ER -