Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Alok Saurav; Manu Kaushik; Venkata Mahesh Alla; Michael D. White; Ruby Satpathy; Thomas Lanspa; Aryan N. Mooss; Michael G. Delcore

doi:10.1002/ccd.26097

Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Alok Saurav, Manu Kaushik, Venkata Mahesh Alla, Michael D. White, Ruby Satpathy, Thomas Lanspa, Aryan N. Mooss, Michael G. Delcore

Department of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background While percutaneous device closure (PDC) is a first-line therapy for isolated muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSD), surgery is still the preferred approach for peri-membranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD). Objective We sought to compare the outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgical closure of pmVSDs. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through October 15, 2014 for English language studies comparing outcomes of PDC with surgical closure of pmVSDs. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. A meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using a random effects model. Comparison was done for early (

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1048-1056
Number of pages	9
Journal	Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume	86
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26097
State	Published - Nov 15 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1002/ccd.26097

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Saurav, A., Kaushik, M., Mahesh Alla, V., White, M. D., Satpathy, R., Lanspa, T., Mooss, A. N., & Delcore, M. G. (2015). Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 86(6), 1048-1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26097

Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Saurav, Alok; Kaushik, Manu; Mahesh Alla, Venkata; White, Michael D.; Satpathy, Ruby; Lanspa, Thomas; Mooss, Aryan N.; Delcore, Michael G.

In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 86, No. 6, 15.11.2015, p. 1048-1056.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Saurav, A, Kaushik, M, Mahesh Alla, V, White, MD, Satpathy, R, Lanspa, T, Mooss, AN & Delcore, MG 2015, 'Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis', Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1048-1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26097

Saurav, Alok ; Kaushik, Manu ; Mahesh Alla, Venkata ; White, Michael D. ; Satpathy, Ruby ; Lanspa, Thomas ; Mooss, Aryan N. ; Delcore, Michael G. / Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2015 ; Vol. 86, No. 6. pp. 1048-1056.

@article{504fe531c7bf4f23a64a2611a14693a6,

title = "Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis",

abstract = "Background While percutaneous device closure (PDC) is a first-line therapy for isolated muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSD), surgery is still the preferred approach for peri-membranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD). Objective We sought to compare the outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgical closure of pmVSDs. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through October 15, 2014 for English language studies comparing outcomes of PDC with surgical closure of pmVSDs. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. A meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using a random effects model. Comparison was done for early (",

author = "Alok Saurav and Manu Kaushik and {Mahesh Alla}, Venkata and White, {Michael D.} and Ruby Satpathy and Thomas Lanspa and Mooss, {Aryan N.} and Delcore, {Michael G.}",

year = "2015",

month = nov,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1002/ccd.26097",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "86",

pages = "1048--1056",

journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",

issn = "1522-1946",

publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Saurav, Alok

AU - Kaushik, Manu

AU - Mahesh Alla, Venkata

AU - White, Michael D.

AU - Satpathy, Ruby

AU - Lanspa, Thomas

AU - Mooss, Aryan N.

AU - Delcore, Michael G.

PY - 2015/11/15

Y1 - 2015/11/15

N2 - Background While percutaneous device closure (PDC) is a first-line therapy for isolated muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSD), surgery is still the preferred approach for peri-membranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD). Objective We sought to compare the outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgical closure of pmVSDs. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through October 15, 2014 for English language studies comparing outcomes of PDC with surgical closure of pmVSDs. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. A meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using a random effects model. Comparison was done for early (

AB - Background While percutaneous device closure (PDC) is a first-line therapy for isolated muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSD), surgery is still the preferred approach for peri-membranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD). Objective We sought to compare the outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgical closure of pmVSDs. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through October 15, 2014 for English language studies comparing outcomes of PDC with surgical closure of pmVSDs. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. A meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using a random effects model. Comparison was done for early (

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947031961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947031961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ccd.26097

DO - 10.1002/ccd.26097

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26257085

AN - SCOPUS:84947031961

VL - 86

SP - 1048

EP - 1056

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1522-1946

IS - 6

ER -

Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this