Abstract
Background While percutaneous device closure (PDC) is a first-line therapy for isolated muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSD), surgery is still the preferred approach for peri-membranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD). Objective We sought to compare the outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgical closure of pmVSDs. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through October 15, 2014 for English language studies comparing outcomes of PDC with surgical closure of pmVSDs. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. A meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using a random effects model. Comparison was done for early (
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1048-1056 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 15 2015 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cite this
Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Saurav, Alok; Kaushik, Manu; Alla, Venkata (Mahesh); White, Michael; Satpathy, Ruby; Lanspa, Thomas; Mooss, Aryan N.; Del Core, Michael.
In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 86, No. 6, 15.11.2015, p. 1048-1056.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Saurav, Alok
AU - Kaushik, Manu
AU - Alla, Venkata (Mahesh)
AU - White, Michael
AU - Satpathy, Ruby
AU - Lanspa, Thomas
AU - Mooss, Aryan N.
AU - Del Core, Michael
PY - 2015/11/15
Y1 - 2015/11/15
N2 - Background While percutaneous device closure (PDC) is a first-line therapy for isolated muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSD), surgery is still the preferred approach for peri-membranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD). Objective We sought to compare the outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgical closure of pmVSDs. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through October 15, 2014 for English language studies comparing outcomes of PDC with surgical closure of pmVSDs. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. A meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using a random effects model. Comparison was done for early (
AB - Background While percutaneous device closure (PDC) is a first-line therapy for isolated muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSD), surgery is still the preferred approach for peri-membranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD). Objective We sought to compare the outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgical closure of pmVSDs. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through October 15, 2014 for English language studies comparing outcomes of PDC with surgical closure of pmVSDs. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. A meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using a random effects model. Comparison was done for early (
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947031961&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947031961&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ccd.26097
DO - 10.1002/ccd.26097
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26257085
AN - SCOPUS:84947031961
VL - 86
SP - 1048
EP - 1056
JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
SN - 1522-1946
IS - 6
ER -