Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Alok Saurav, Manu Kaushik, Venkata (Mahesh) Alla, Michael White, Ruby Satpathy, Thomas Lanspa, Aryan N. Mooss, Michael Del Core

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background While percutaneous device closure (PDC) is a first-line therapy for isolated muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSD), surgery is still the preferred approach for peri-membranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD). Objective We sought to compare the outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgical closure of pmVSDs. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through October 15, 2014 for English language studies comparing outcomes of PDC with surgical closure of pmVSDs. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. A meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using a random effects model. Comparison was done for early (

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1048-1056
Number of pages9
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume86
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2015

Fingerprint

Ventricular Heart Septal Defects
Meta-Analysis
Library Science
Publication Bias
Equipment and Supplies
PubMed
Language
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{504fe531c7bf4f23a64a2611a14693a6,
title = "Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background While percutaneous device closure (PDC) is a first-line therapy for isolated muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSD), surgery is still the preferred approach for peri-membranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD). Objective We sought to compare the outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgical closure of pmVSDs. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through October 15, 2014 for English language studies comparing outcomes of PDC with surgical closure of pmVSDs. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. A meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using a random effects model. Comparison was done for early (",
author = "Alok Saurav and Manu Kaushik and Alla, {Venkata (Mahesh)} and Michael White and Ruby Satpathy and Thomas Lanspa and Mooss, {Aryan N.} and {Del Core}, Michael",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/ccd.26097",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "1048--1056",
journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1522-1946",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of percutaneous device closure versus surgical closure of peri-membranous ventricular septal defects

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Saurav, Alok

AU - Kaushik, Manu

AU - Alla, Venkata (Mahesh)

AU - White, Michael

AU - Satpathy, Ruby

AU - Lanspa, Thomas

AU - Mooss, Aryan N.

AU - Del Core, Michael

PY - 2015/11/15

Y1 - 2015/11/15

N2 - Background While percutaneous device closure (PDC) is a first-line therapy for isolated muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSD), surgery is still the preferred approach for peri-membranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD). Objective We sought to compare the outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgical closure of pmVSDs. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through October 15, 2014 for English language studies comparing outcomes of PDC with surgical closure of pmVSDs. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. A meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using a random effects model. Comparison was done for early (

AB - Background While percutaneous device closure (PDC) is a first-line therapy for isolated muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSD), surgery is still the preferred approach for peri-membranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD). Objective We sought to compare the outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgical closure of pmVSDs. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through October 15, 2014 for English language studies comparing outcomes of PDC with surgical closure of pmVSDs. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed. A meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using a random effects model. Comparison was done for early (

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947031961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947031961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ccd.26097

DO - 10.1002/ccd.26097

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26257085

AN - SCOPUS:84947031961

VL - 86

SP - 1048

EP - 1056

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1522-1946

IS - 6

ER -