Abstract
Introduction: Deficits after breast cancer treatment have been examined by comparing the surgically affected upper extremity to the unaffected extremity. It is not possible to know precisely if anti-cancer treatment such as radiation and chemotherapy had any effect on the unaffected arm. The purpose of this study was to compare ROM, strength, and shoulder function between breast cancer survivors and healthy, matched controls. Methods: Shoulder pain and function was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder Hand (DASH) and the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PSS). Active and passive range of motion (ROM) for shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation (ER) at 0° and 90° of abduction, internal rotation (IR) at 90° of abduction were measured on the affected side using a digital inclinometer. Strength was measured using a hand held dynamometer for scapular abduction and upward rotation, scapular depression and adduction, flexion, internal rotation, ER, scaption, and horizontal adduction. Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups for the DASH (p
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 167-174 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Cancer Survivorship |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Oncology
- Oncology(nursing)
Cite this
Comparison of shoulder flexibility, strength, and function between breast cancer survivors and healthy participants. / Harrington, Shana; Padua, Darin; Battaglini, Claudio; Michener, Lori A.; Giuliani, Carol; Myers, Joseph; Groff, Diane.
In: Journal of Cancer Survivorship, Vol. 5, No. 2, 06.2011, p. 167-174.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of shoulder flexibility, strength, and function between breast cancer survivors and healthy participants
AU - Harrington, Shana
AU - Padua, Darin
AU - Battaglini, Claudio
AU - Michener, Lori A.
AU - Giuliani, Carol
AU - Myers, Joseph
AU - Groff, Diane
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - Introduction: Deficits after breast cancer treatment have been examined by comparing the surgically affected upper extremity to the unaffected extremity. It is not possible to know precisely if anti-cancer treatment such as radiation and chemotherapy had any effect on the unaffected arm. The purpose of this study was to compare ROM, strength, and shoulder function between breast cancer survivors and healthy, matched controls. Methods: Shoulder pain and function was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder Hand (DASH) and the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PSS). Active and passive range of motion (ROM) for shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation (ER) at 0° and 90° of abduction, internal rotation (IR) at 90° of abduction were measured on the affected side using a digital inclinometer. Strength was measured using a hand held dynamometer for scapular abduction and upward rotation, scapular depression and adduction, flexion, internal rotation, ER, scaption, and horizontal adduction. Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups for the DASH (p
AB - Introduction: Deficits after breast cancer treatment have been examined by comparing the surgically affected upper extremity to the unaffected extremity. It is not possible to know precisely if anti-cancer treatment such as radiation and chemotherapy had any effect on the unaffected arm. The purpose of this study was to compare ROM, strength, and shoulder function between breast cancer survivors and healthy, matched controls. Methods: Shoulder pain and function was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder Hand (DASH) and the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PSS). Active and passive range of motion (ROM) for shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation (ER) at 0° and 90° of abduction, internal rotation (IR) at 90° of abduction were measured on the affected side using a digital inclinometer. Strength was measured using a hand held dynamometer for scapular abduction and upward rotation, scapular depression and adduction, flexion, internal rotation, ER, scaption, and horizontal adduction. Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups for the DASH (p
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956198318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956198318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11764-010-0168-0
DO - 10.1007/s11764-010-0168-0
M3 - Article
VL - 5
SP - 167
EP - 174
JO - Journal of Cancer Survivorship
JF - Journal of Cancer Survivorship
SN - 1932-2259
IS - 2
ER -