Comparison of shoulder flexibility, strength, and function between breast cancer survivors and healthy participants

Shana Harrington, Darin Padua, Claudio Battaglini, Lori A. Michener, Carol Giuliani, Joseph Myers, Diane Groff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Deficits after breast cancer treatment have been examined by comparing the surgically affected upper extremity to the unaffected extremity. It is not possible to know precisely if anti-cancer treatment such as radiation and chemotherapy had any effect on the unaffected arm. The purpose of this study was to compare ROM, strength, and shoulder function between breast cancer survivors and healthy, matched controls. Methods: Shoulder pain and function was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder Hand (DASH) and the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PSS). Active and passive range of motion (ROM) for shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation (ER) at 0° and 90° of abduction, internal rotation (IR) at 90° of abduction were measured on the affected side using a digital inclinometer. Strength was measured using a hand held dynamometer for scapular abduction and upward rotation, scapular depression and adduction, flexion, internal rotation, ER, scaption, and horizontal adduction. Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups for the DASH (p

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-174
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cancer Survivorship
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Healthy Volunteers
Breast Neoplasms
Arm
Hand
Articular Range of Motion
Shoulder Pain
Upper Extremity
Extremities
Radiation
Depression
Drug Therapy
Therapeutics
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

Harrington, S., Padua, D., Battaglini, C., Michener, L. A., Giuliani, C., Myers, J., & Groff, D. (2011). Comparison of shoulder flexibility, strength, and function between breast cancer survivors and healthy participants. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 5(2), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0168-0

Comparison of shoulder flexibility, strength, and function between breast cancer survivors and healthy participants. / Harrington, Shana; Padua, Darin; Battaglini, Claudio; Michener, Lori A.; Giuliani, Carol; Myers, Joseph; Groff, Diane.

In: Journal of Cancer Survivorship, Vol. 5, No. 2, 06.2011, p. 167-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harrington, S, Padua, D, Battaglini, C, Michener, LA, Giuliani, C, Myers, J & Groff, D 2011, 'Comparison of shoulder flexibility, strength, and function between breast cancer survivors and healthy participants', Journal of Cancer Survivorship, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 167-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0168-0
Harrington, Shana ; Padua, Darin ; Battaglini, Claudio ; Michener, Lori A. ; Giuliani, Carol ; Myers, Joseph ; Groff, Diane. / Comparison of shoulder flexibility, strength, and function between breast cancer survivors and healthy participants. In: Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2011 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 167-174.
@article{aa0afac552084ab5a38a041fda88061e,
title = "Comparison of shoulder flexibility, strength, and function between breast cancer survivors and healthy participants",
abstract = "Introduction: Deficits after breast cancer treatment have been examined by comparing the surgically affected upper extremity to the unaffected extremity. It is not possible to know precisely if anti-cancer treatment such as radiation and chemotherapy had any effect on the unaffected arm. The purpose of this study was to compare ROM, strength, and shoulder function between breast cancer survivors and healthy, matched controls. Methods: Shoulder pain and function was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder Hand (DASH) and the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PSS). Active and passive range of motion (ROM) for shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation (ER) at 0° and 90° of abduction, internal rotation (IR) at 90° of abduction were measured on the affected side using a digital inclinometer. Strength was measured using a hand held dynamometer for scapular abduction and upward rotation, scapular depression and adduction, flexion, internal rotation, ER, scaption, and horizontal adduction. Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups for the DASH (p",
author = "Shana Harrington and Darin Padua and Claudio Battaglini and Michener, {Lori A.} and Carol Giuliani and Joseph Myers and Diane Groff",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11764-010-0168-0",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "167--174",
journal = "Journal of Cancer Survivorship",
issn = "1932-2259",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of shoulder flexibility, strength, and function between breast cancer survivors and healthy participants

AU - Harrington, Shana

AU - Padua, Darin

AU - Battaglini, Claudio

AU - Michener, Lori A.

AU - Giuliani, Carol

AU - Myers, Joseph

AU - Groff, Diane

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Introduction: Deficits after breast cancer treatment have been examined by comparing the surgically affected upper extremity to the unaffected extremity. It is not possible to know precisely if anti-cancer treatment such as radiation and chemotherapy had any effect on the unaffected arm. The purpose of this study was to compare ROM, strength, and shoulder function between breast cancer survivors and healthy, matched controls. Methods: Shoulder pain and function was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder Hand (DASH) and the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PSS). Active and passive range of motion (ROM) for shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation (ER) at 0° and 90° of abduction, internal rotation (IR) at 90° of abduction were measured on the affected side using a digital inclinometer. Strength was measured using a hand held dynamometer for scapular abduction and upward rotation, scapular depression and adduction, flexion, internal rotation, ER, scaption, and horizontal adduction. Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups for the DASH (p

AB - Introduction: Deficits after breast cancer treatment have been examined by comparing the surgically affected upper extremity to the unaffected extremity. It is not possible to know precisely if anti-cancer treatment such as radiation and chemotherapy had any effect on the unaffected arm. The purpose of this study was to compare ROM, strength, and shoulder function between breast cancer survivors and healthy, matched controls. Methods: Shoulder pain and function was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder Hand (DASH) and the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PSS). Active and passive range of motion (ROM) for shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation (ER) at 0° and 90° of abduction, internal rotation (IR) at 90° of abduction were measured on the affected side using a digital inclinometer. Strength was measured using a hand held dynamometer for scapular abduction and upward rotation, scapular depression and adduction, flexion, internal rotation, ER, scaption, and horizontal adduction. Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups for the DASH (p

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956198318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956198318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11764-010-0168-0

DO - 10.1007/s11764-010-0168-0

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 167

EP - 174

JO - Journal of Cancer Survivorship

JF - Journal of Cancer Survivorship

SN - 1932-2259

IS - 2

ER -