Comparison of the effectiveness of scaling and root planing in vivo using hand vs rotary instruments

Serge Dibart; Diego Capri; Piero Casavecchia; Martha Nunn; Ziedonis Skobe

Comparison of the effectiveness of scaling and root planing in vivo using hand vs rotary instruments

Serge Dibart, Diego Capri, Piero Casavecchia, Martha Nunn, Ziedonis Skobe

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The purpose of the present investigation was to compare the effectiveness of a scaling bur and conventional Gracey curettes in vivo. Ten teeth scheduled for extraction were scaled and root planed thoroughly before extraction. The instrumented areas were observed using SEM. Scaling with a No. 12 fluted carbide bur was more effective in removing debris and plaque than were conventional Gracey curettes. Because of the aggressive nature of the process, a certain learning curve is necessary to get accustomed to bur scaling; otherwise, dentinal hypersensitivity and patient discomfort may be increased.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	370-377
Number of pages	8
Journal	International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry
Volume	24
Issue number	4
State	Published - Jan 1 2004
Externally published	Yes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Oral Surgery
Periodontics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the effectiveness of scaling and root planing in vivo using hand vs rotary instruments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{5486b4b26fbd4360b48f64f4c4cdfc31,

title = "Comparison of the effectiveness of scaling and root planing in vivo using hand vs rotary instruments",

abstract = "The purpose of the present investigation was to compare the effectiveness of a scaling bur and conventional Gracey curettes in vivo. Ten teeth scheduled for extraction were scaled and root planed thoroughly before extraction. The instrumented areas were observed using SEM. Scaling with a No. 12 fluted carbide bur was more effective in removing debris and plaque than were conventional Gracey curettes. Because of the aggressive nature of the process, a certain learning curve is necessary to get accustomed to bur scaling; otherwise, dentinal hypersensitivity and patient discomfort may be increased.",

author = "Serge Dibart and Diego Capri and Piero Casavecchia and Martha Nunn and Ziedonis Skobe",

year = "2004",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "24",

pages = "370--377",

journal = "International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry",

issn = "0198-7569",

publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the effectiveness of scaling and root planing in vivo using hand vs rotary instruments

AU - Dibart, Serge

AU - Capri, Diego

AU - Casavecchia, Piero

AU - Nunn, Martha

AU - Skobe, Ziedonis

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - The purpose of the present investigation was to compare the effectiveness of a scaling bur and conventional Gracey curettes in vivo. Ten teeth scheduled for extraction were scaled and root planed thoroughly before extraction. The instrumented areas were observed using SEM. Scaling with a No. 12 fluted carbide bur was more effective in removing debris and plaque than were conventional Gracey curettes. Because of the aggressive nature of the process, a certain learning curve is necessary to get accustomed to bur scaling; otherwise, dentinal hypersensitivity and patient discomfort may be increased.

AB - The purpose of the present investigation was to compare the effectiveness of a scaling bur and conventional Gracey curettes in vivo. Ten teeth scheduled for extraction were scaled and root planed thoroughly before extraction. The instrumented areas were observed using SEM. Scaling with a No. 12 fluted carbide bur was more effective in removing debris and plaque than were conventional Gracey curettes. Because of the aggressive nature of the process, a certain learning curve is necessary to get accustomed to bur scaling; otherwise, dentinal hypersensitivity and patient discomfort may be increased.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143147464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143147464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15446407

AN - SCOPUS:4143147464

VL - 24

SP - 370

EP - 377

JO - International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

JF - International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

SN - 0198-7569

IS - 4

ER -

Comparison of the effectiveness of scaling and root planing in vivo using hand vs rotary instruments

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Other files and links

Cite this