Abstract
The purpose of the present investigation was to compare the effectiveness of a scaling bur and conventional Gracey curettes in vivo. Ten teeth scheduled for extraction were scaled and root planed thoroughly before extraction. The instrumented areas were observed using SEM. Scaling with a No. 12 fluted carbide bur was more effective in removing debris and plaque than were conventional Gracey curettes. Because of the aggressive nature of the process, a certain learning curve is necessary to get accustomed to bur scaling; otherwise, dentinal hypersensitivity and patient discomfort may be increased.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 370-377 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Oral Surgery
- Periodontics
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the effectiveness of scaling and root planing in vivo using hand vs rotary instruments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Dibart, S., Capri, D., Casavecchia, P., Nunn, M., & Skobe, Z. (2004). Comparison of the effectiveness of scaling and root planing in vivo using hand vs rotary instruments. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 24(4), 370-377.