Computerized neurocognitive assessments and detection of the malingering athlete

Jacob A. Siedlik, Spyros Siscos, Karen Evans, Adam Rolf, Philip Gallagher, Jennifer Seeley, John Vardiman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals are concerned that athletes have the capability to intentionally underperform on baseline computerized neurocognitive assessments in an effort to expedite their return to the field of play following a concussion. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of overlapping validity measures will provide better sensitivity for detecting malingering athletes on a baseline computerized neurocognitive assessment. METHODS: Twenty male, collegiate rugby players (mean age 23±4 years) participated in this study. Subjects completed 2 Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) assessments within a 7-day interval. The initial test, non-malingering baseline (NM), was performed adhering to ImPACT's normal sequence of instructions. Immediately prior to the second assessment, the malingering attempt (MA), each participant was instructed to "underperform on the test" in such a way that it was not obvious they were trying to score poorly. RESULTS: ImPACT detected 70% (N.=14) of the malingerers using internal validation measures, whereas the trained physician identified 80% of the malingerers (N.=16) including all of the malingerers detected by ImPACT. The Schatz Word Memory Check identified 100% of malingering tests. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the combination of a trained physician review and ImPACT test measures are more successful at recognizing possible malingers than use of the ImPACT validity measures alone. The Schatz Word Memory Check was highly effective at identifying invalid baseline tests and should be considered a valid test measure for future clinical reviews.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1086-1091
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness
Volume56
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Malingering
Athletes
Physicians
Football
Delivery of Health Care

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Siedlik, J. A., Siscos, S., Evans, K., Rolf, A., Gallagher, P., Seeley, J., & Vardiman, J. (2016). Computerized neurocognitive assessments and detection of the malingering athlete. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 56(9), 1086-1091.

Computerized neurocognitive assessments and detection of the malingering athlete. / Siedlik, Jacob A.; Siscos, Spyros; Evans, Karen; Rolf, Adam; Gallagher, Philip; Seeley, Jennifer; Vardiman, John.

In: Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, Vol. 56, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 1086-1091.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Siedlik, JA, Siscos, S, Evans, K, Rolf, A, Gallagher, P, Seeley, J & Vardiman, J 2016, 'Computerized neurocognitive assessments and detection of the malingering athlete', Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1086-1091.
Siedlik, Jacob A. ; Siscos, Spyros ; Evans, Karen ; Rolf, Adam ; Gallagher, Philip ; Seeley, Jennifer ; Vardiman, John. / Computerized neurocognitive assessments and detection of the malingering athlete. In: Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2016 ; Vol. 56, No. 9. pp. 1086-1091.
@article{2a3768dd75eb4d528878725bb9db835b,
title = "Computerized neurocognitive assessments and detection of the malingering athlete",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals are concerned that athletes have the capability to intentionally underperform on baseline computerized neurocognitive assessments in an effort to expedite their return to the field of play following a concussion. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of overlapping validity measures will provide better sensitivity for detecting malingering athletes on a baseline computerized neurocognitive assessment. METHODS: Twenty male, collegiate rugby players (mean age 23±4 years) participated in this study. Subjects completed 2 Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) assessments within a 7-day interval. The initial test, non-malingering baseline (NM), was performed adhering to ImPACT's normal sequence of instructions. Immediately prior to the second assessment, the malingering attempt (MA), each participant was instructed to {"}underperform on the test{"} in such a way that it was not obvious they were trying to score poorly. RESULTS: ImPACT detected 70{\%} (N.=14) of the malingerers using internal validation measures, whereas the trained physician identified 80{\%} of the malingerers (N.=16) including all of the malingerers detected by ImPACT. The Schatz Word Memory Check identified 100{\%} of malingering tests. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the combination of a trained physician review and ImPACT test measures are more successful at recognizing possible malingers than use of the ImPACT validity measures alone. The Schatz Word Memory Check was highly effective at identifying invalid baseline tests and should be considered a valid test measure for future clinical reviews.",
author = "Siedlik, {Jacob A.} and Spyros Siscos and Karen Evans and Adam Rolf and Philip Gallagher and Jennifer Seeley and John Vardiman",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "1086--1091",
journal = "Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness",
issn = "0022-4707",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computerized neurocognitive assessments and detection of the malingering athlete

AU - Siedlik, Jacob A.

AU - Siscos, Spyros

AU - Evans, Karen

AU - Rolf, Adam

AU - Gallagher, Philip

AU - Seeley, Jennifer

AU - Vardiman, John

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals are concerned that athletes have the capability to intentionally underperform on baseline computerized neurocognitive assessments in an effort to expedite their return to the field of play following a concussion. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of overlapping validity measures will provide better sensitivity for detecting malingering athletes on a baseline computerized neurocognitive assessment. METHODS: Twenty male, collegiate rugby players (mean age 23±4 years) participated in this study. Subjects completed 2 Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) assessments within a 7-day interval. The initial test, non-malingering baseline (NM), was performed adhering to ImPACT's normal sequence of instructions. Immediately prior to the second assessment, the malingering attempt (MA), each participant was instructed to "underperform on the test" in such a way that it was not obvious they were trying to score poorly. RESULTS: ImPACT detected 70% (N.=14) of the malingerers using internal validation measures, whereas the trained physician identified 80% of the malingerers (N.=16) including all of the malingerers detected by ImPACT. The Schatz Word Memory Check identified 100% of malingering tests. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the combination of a trained physician review and ImPACT test measures are more successful at recognizing possible malingers than use of the ImPACT validity measures alone. The Schatz Word Memory Check was highly effective at identifying invalid baseline tests and should be considered a valid test measure for future clinical reviews.

AB - BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals are concerned that athletes have the capability to intentionally underperform on baseline computerized neurocognitive assessments in an effort to expedite their return to the field of play following a concussion. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of overlapping validity measures will provide better sensitivity for detecting malingering athletes on a baseline computerized neurocognitive assessment. METHODS: Twenty male, collegiate rugby players (mean age 23±4 years) participated in this study. Subjects completed 2 Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) assessments within a 7-day interval. The initial test, non-malingering baseline (NM), was performed adhering to ImPACT's normal sequence of instructions. Immediately prior to the second assessment, the malingering attempt (MA), each participant was instructed to "underperform on the test" in such a way that it was not obvious they were trying to score poorly. RESULTS: ImPACT detected 70% (N.=14) of the malingerers using internal validation measures, whereas the trained physician identified 80% of the malingerers (N.=16) including all of the malingerers detected by ImPACT. The Schatz Word Memory Check identified 100% of malingering tests. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the combination of a trained physician review and ImPACT test measures are more successful at recognizing possible malingers than use of the ImPACT validity measures alone. The Schatz Word Memory Check was highly effective at identifying invalid baseline tests and should be considered a valid test measure for future clinical reviews.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979915629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979915629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 1086

EP - 1091

JO - Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness

JF - Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness

SN - 0022-4707

IS - 9

ER -