TY - JOUR
T1 - Coronary Bifurcation Stenting
T2 - Review of Current Techniques and Evidence
AU - Aedma, Surya Kiran
AU - Naik, Anant
AU - Kanmanthareddy, Arun
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was not funded by any funding sources or grants, and thus there are no disclosures.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Bentham Science Publishers.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Background: Coronary bifurcation stenting constitutes 20% of all PCI performed. Giv-en the extensive prevalence of bifurcation lesions, various techniques have sought to optimally stent the bifurcation to improve revascularization while also decreasing rates of stent thrombosis and lesion recurrence. Advanced techniques, such as planned two-stent approaches, have been shown to have improved outcomes but also require fluoroscopy and procedure time, posing an economic argument as well as a patient-outcome one. Objective: Because of the many strategies posited in the literature, it becomes essential to objec-tively evaluate evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses to help determine the optimal stenting strategy. Methods: We reviewed the clinical evidence on the efficacy of coronary bifurcation stenting. Results: In this paper, we review the most recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of various stenting techniques and advances in stenting technologies published to gauge the current state of understanding and chart where the field is heading. Conclusion: Bifurcation stenting is a maturing problem in the field of interventional cardiology that is adapting to the needs of the patients and advances in technology.
AB - Background: Coronary bifurcation stenting constitutes 20% of all PCI performed. Giv-en the extensive prevalence of bifurcation lesions, various techniques have sought to optimally stent the bifurcation to improve revascularization while also decreasing rates of stent thrombosis and lesion recurrence. Advanced techniques, such as planned two-stent approaches, have been shown to have improved outcomes but also require fluoroscopy and procedure time, posing an economic argument as well as a patient-outcome one. Objective: Because of the many strategies posited in the literature, it becomes essential to objec-tively evaluate evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses to help determine the optimal stenting strategy. Methods: We reviewed the clinical evidence on the efficacy of coronary bifurcation stenting. Results: In this paper, we review the most recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of various stenting techniques and advances in stenting technologies published to gauge the current state of understanding and chart where the field is heading. Conclusion: Bifurcation stenting is a maturing problem in the field of interventional cardiology that is adapting to the needs of the patients and advances in technology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144008745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144008745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2174/1573403X18666220406113517
DO - 10.2174/1573403X18666220406113517
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35388761
AN - SCOPUS:85144008745
VL - 19
SP - 32
EP - 44
JO - Current Cardiology Reviews
JF - Current Cardiology Reviews
SN - 1573-403X
IS - 1
M1 - e060422203185
ER -