Day-of-the-week effect in the Canadian money market

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the day-of-the-week effect for three primary money market instruments in Canada. The sample period is 1980-2009. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use three approaches. First, a parametric t-test is employed to determine if a particular day-of-the-week mean return is significantly different from zero, using both a full sample and a trimmed sample. Next, the Wilcoxon signed ranked test is utilized to assess whether the median weekday return is different from zero for each day. Lastly, a binary regression model is used to test if Monday's mean return is different from other days. Findings – The traditional Monday effect is prevalent in the 1980s for corporate paper and treasury bills (TB), but not for bankers acceptances (BA). In the 1990s, the Monday effect disappears completely. However, in the 2000s the Monday effect reappears, but is positive (it reverses) for both corporate paper and BA. The authors also find strong support for Wednesday being a high return day, which concurs with related money market studies. Research limitations/implications – While the results are statistically significant, the economic significance is dubious. This study helps market participants in that it shows that they need to allow for distinct day-of-the-week patterns when using yield spreads. Practical implications – One practical implication for practitioners is to time purchases of Canadian money market securities for Monday when returns are low (relying on the results of the full sample period). Issuers should time sales for non-Mondays when returns are higher and yields are lower. Originality/value – This study is original in that it is the first one to analyze day-of-the-week effects in the Canadian money market. The authors compare the results to studies that focus on the US market.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)855-866
Number of pages12
JournalManagerial Finance
Volume37
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 9 2011

Fingerprint

Day of the week effect
Money market
Monday effect
Acceptance
Bankers
T-test
Economic significance
Canada
Yield spread
Design methodology
Median
Regression model
Purchase

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Day-of-the-week effect in the Canadian money market. / Washer, Kenneth M.; Nippani, Srinivas; Wingender, John R.

In: Managerial Finance, Vol. 37, No. 9, 09.08.2011, p. 855-866.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d2c18d96418b4a8bb77eaf4077ea242f,
title = "Day-of-the-week effect in the Canadian money market",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the day-of-the-week effect for three primary money market instruments in Canada. The sample period is 1980-2009. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use three approaches. First, a parametric t-test is employed to determine if a particular day-of-the-week mean return is significantly different from zero, using both a full sample and a trimmed sample. Next, the Wilcoxon signed ranked test is utilized to assess whether the median weekday return is different from zero for each day. Lastly, a binary regression model is used to test if Monday's mean return is different from other days. Findings – The traditional Monday effect is prevalent in the 1980s for corporate paper and treasury bills (TB), but not for bankers acceptances (BA). In the 1990s, the Monday effect disappears completely. However, in the 2000s the Monday effect reappears, but is positive (it reverses) for both corporate paper and BA. The authors also find strong support for Wednesday being a high return day, which concurs with related money market studies. Research limitations/implications – While the results are statistically significant, the economic significance is dubious. This study helps market participants in that it shows that they need to allow for distinct day-of-the-week patterns when using yield spreads. Practical implications – One practical implication for practitioners is to time purchases of Canadian money market securities for Monday when returns are low (relying on the results of the full sample period). Issuers should time sales for non-Mondays when returns are higher and yields are lower. Originality/value – This study is original in that it is the first one to analyze day-of-the-week effects in the Canadian money market. The authors compare the results to studies that focus on the US market.",
author = "Washer, {Kenneth M.} and Srinivas Nippani and Wingender, {John R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1108/03074351111153230",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "855--866",
journal = "Managerial Finance",
issn = "0307-4358",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Day-of-the-week effect in the Canadian money market

AU - Washer, Kenneth M.

AU - Nippani, Srinivas

AU - Wingender, John R.

PY - 2011/8/9

Y1 - 2011/8/9

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the day-of-the-week effect for three primary money market instruments in Canada. The sample period is 1980-2009. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use three approaches. First, a parametric t-test is employed to determine if a particular day-of-the-week mean return is significantly different from zero, using both a full sample and a trimmed sample. Next, the Wilcoxon signed ranked test is utilized to assess whether the median weekday return is different from zero for each day. Lastly, a binary regression model is used to test if Monday's mean return is different from other days. Findings – The traditional Monday effect is prevalent in the 1980s for corporate paper and treasury bills (TB), but not for bankers acceptances (BA). In the 1990s, the Monday effect disappears completely. However, in the 2000s the Monday effect reappears, but is positive (it reverses) for both corporate paper and BA. The authors also find strong support for Wednesday being a high return day, which concurs with related money market studies. Research limitations/implications – While the results are statistically significant, the economic significance is dubious. This study helps market participants in that it shows that they need to allow for distinct day-of-the-week patterns when using yield spreads. Practical implications – One practical implication for practitioners is to time purchases of Canadian money market securities for Monday when returns are low (relying on the results of the full sample period). Issuers should time sales for non-Mondays when returns are higher and yields are lower. Originality/value – This study is original in that it is the first one to analyze day-of-the-week effects in the Canadian money market. The authors compare the results to studies that focus on the US market.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the day-of-the-week effect for three primary money market instruments in Canada. The sample period is 1980-2009. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use three approaches. First, a parametric t-test is employed to determine if a particular day-of-the-week mean return is significantly different from zero, using both a full sample and a trimmed sample. Next, the Wilcoxon signed ranked test is utilized to assess whether the median weekday return is different from zero for each day. Lastly, a binary regression model is used to test if Monday's mean return is different from other days. Findings – The traditional Monday effect is prevalent in the 1980s for corporate paper and treasury bills (TB), but not for bankers acceptances (BA). In the 1990s, the Monday effect disappears completely. However, in the 2000s the Monday effect reappears, but is positive (it reverses) for both corporate paper and BA. The authors also find strong support for Wednesday being a high return day, which concurs with related money market studies. Research limitations/implications – While the results are statistically significant, the economic significance is dubious. This study helps market participants in that it shows that they need to allow for distinct day-of-the-week patterns when using yield spreads. Practical implications – One practical implication for practitioners is to time purchases of Canadian money market securities for Monday when returns are low (relying on the results of the full sample period). Issuers should time sales for non-Mondays when returns are higher and yields are lower. Originality/value – This study is original in that it is the first one to analyze day-of-the-week effects in the Canadian money market. The authors compare the results to studies that focus on the US market.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015636905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015636905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/03074351111153230

DO - 10.1108/03074351111153230

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 855

EP - 866

JO - Managerial Finance

JF - Managerial Finance

SN - 0307-4358

IS - 9

ER -