Deconstructing the Better-Than-Average Effect

Corey L. Guenther, Mark D. Alicke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The tendency for people to evaluate themselves more favorably than an average-peer-the better-than-average effect (BTAE)-is among the most well-documented effects in the social-psychological literature. The BTAE has been demonstrated in many populations with various methodologies, and several explanations have been advanced for it. Two essential questions remain conspicuously unanswered in the BTAE literature. The first concerns the extent to which the BTAE can be represented as a social-comparative phenomenon, and the second concerns the role that strategic motivational processes play in self versus average-peer judgments. With regard to the first question, Study 1 provides direct experimental evidence that self versus average-peer judgments are made relationally rather than independently and, further, that self-ratings anchor these relational judgments. Moreover, Study 1 demonstrates that the consequence of this comparison is for judgments of average to be assimilated toward, not contrasted from, self-ratings. Studies 2-4 provide evidence that self-enhancement motives play a moderating role in the outcome of self versus average-peer judgments. We show that for dimensions on which the self is positively evaluated, enhancement motives restrict the extent to which average-peer assimilation occurs (Study 2). But for dimensions on which the self is negatively evaluated, enhancement motives amplify average-peer assimilation (Studies 3 and 4). Discussion focuses on the function of such differential assimilation, the relation of the current findings to extant perspectives, and directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)755-770
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume99
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

assimilation
rating
evidence
Psychology
methodology
Population
literature
Direction compound

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Deconstructing the Better-Than-Average Effect. / Guenther, Corey L.; Alicke, Mark D.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 99, No. 5, 11.2010, p. 755-770.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7a5dd2e260254bbe94cc3fad11435cb7,
title = "Deconstructing the Better-Than-Average Effect",
abstract = "The tendency for people to evaluate themselves more favorably than an average-peer-the better-than-average effect (BTAE)-is among the most well-documented effects in the social-psychological literature. The BTAE has been demonstrated in many populations with various methodologies, and several explanations have been advanced for it. Two essential questions remain conspicuously unanswered in the BTAE literature. The first concerns the extent to which the BTAE can be represented as a social-comparative phenomenon, and the second concerns the role that strategic motivational processes play in self versus average-peer judgments. With regard to the first question, Study 1 provides direct experimental evidence that self versus average-peer judgments are made relationally rather than independently and, further, that self-ratings anchor these relational judgments. Moreover, Study 1 demonstrates that the consequence of this comparison is for judgments of average to be assimilated toward, not contrasted from, self-ratings. Studies 2-4 provide evidence that self-enhancement motives play a moderating role in the outcome of self versus average-peer judgments. We show that for dimensions on which the self is positively evaluated, enhancement motives restrict the extent to which average-peer assimilation occurs (Study 2). But for dimensions on which the self is negatively evaluated, enhancement motives amplify average-peer assimilation (Studies 3 and 4). Discussion focuses on the function of such differential assimilation, the relation of the current findings to extant perspectives, and directions for future research.",
author = "Guenther, {Corey L.} and Alicke, {Mark D.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/a0020959",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "755--770",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deconstructing the Better-Than-Average Effect

AU - Guenther, Corey L.

AU - Alicke, Mark D.

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - The tendency for people to evaluate themselves more favorably than an average-peer-the better-than-average effect (BTAE)-is among the most well-documented effects in the social-psychological literature. The BTAE has been demonstrated in many populations with various methodologies, and several explanations have been advanced for it. Two essential questions remain conspicuously unanswered in the BTAE literature. The first concerns the extent to which the BTAE can be represented as a social-comparative phenomenon, and the second concerns the role that strategic motivational processes play in self versus average-peer judgments. With regard to the first question, Study 1 provides direct experimental evidence that self versus average-peer judgments are made relationally rather than independently and, further, that self-ratings anchor these relational judgments. Moreover, Study 1 demonstrates that the consequence of this comparison is for judgments of average to be assimilated toward, not contrasted from, self-ratings. Studies 2-4 provide evidence that self-enhancement motives play a moderating role in the outcome of self versus average-peer judgments. We show that for dimensions on which the self is positively evaluated, enhancement motives restrict the extent to which average-peer assimilation occurs (Study 2). But for dimensions on which the self is negatively evaluated, enhancement motives amplify average-peer assimilation (Studies 3 and 4). Discussion focuses on the function of such differential assimilation, the relation of the current findings to extant perspectives, and directions for future research.

AB - The tendency for people to evaluate themselves more favorably than an average-peer-the better-than-average effect (BTAE)-is among the most well-documented effects in the social-psychological literature. The BTAE has been demonstrated in many populations with various methodologies, and several explanations have been advanced for it. Two essential questions remain conspicuously unanswered in the BTAE literature. The first concerns the extent to which the BTAE can be represented as a social-comparative phenomenon, and the second concerns the role that strategic motivational processes play in self versus average-peer judgments. With regard to the first question, Study 1 provides direct experimental evidence that self versus average-peer judgments are made relationally rather than independently and, further, that self-ratings anchor these relational judgments. Moreover, Study 1 demonstrates that the consequence of this comparison is for judgments of average to be assimilated toward, not contrasted from, self-ratings. Studies 2-4 provide evidence that self-enhancement motives play a moderating role in the outcome of self versus average-peer judgments. We show that for dimensions on which the self is positively evaluated, enhancement motives restrict the extent to which average-peer assimilation occurs (Study 2). But for dimensions on which the self is negatively evaluated, enhancement motives amplify average-peer assimilation (Studies 3 and 4). Discussion focuses on the function of such differential assimilation, the relation of the current findings to extant perspectives, and directions for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958556971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958556971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0020959

DO - 10.1037/a0020959

M3 - Article

C2 - 20954785

AN - SCOPUS:77958556971

VL - 99

SP - 755

EP - 770

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 5

ER -