Delayed lead perforation: Can we ever let the guard down?

Venkata (Mahesh) Alla, Yeruva M. Reddy, William Abide, Tom Hee, Claire B. Hunter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lead perforation is a major complication of cardiac rhythm management devices (CRMD), occurring in about 1. While most lead perforations occur early, numerous instances of delayed lead perforation (occurring > 30 days after implantation) have been reported in the last few years. Only about 40 such cases have been published, with the majority occurring <1 year after implantation. Herein, we describe the case of an 84-year-old female who presented with recurrent syncope and was diagnosed to have delayed pacemaker lead perforation 4.8 years after implantation. Through this report, we intend to highlight the increasing use of CRMD in elderly patients, and the lifelong risk of complications with these devices. Presentation can be atypical and a high index of suspicion is necessary for diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Article number741751
JournalCardiology Research and Practice
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Syncope
Lead

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Delayed lead perforation : Can we ever let the guard down? / Alla, Venkata (Mahesh); Reddy, Yeruva M.; Abide, William; Hee, Tom; Hunter, Claire B.

In: Cardiology Research and Practice, Vol. 1, No. 1, 741751, 2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8834224bcdb044b9889863b50384995c,
title = "Delayed lead perforation: Can we ever let the guard down?",
abstract = "Lead perforation is a major complication of cardiac rhythm management devices (CRMD), occurring in about 1. While most lead perforations occur early, numerous instances of delayed lead perforation (occurring > 30 days after implantation) have been reported in the last few years. Only about 40 such cases have been published, with the majority occurring <1 year after implantation. Herein, we describe the case of an 84-year-old female who presented with recurrent syncope and was diagnosed to have delayed pacemaker lead perforation 4.8 years after implantation. Through this report, we intend to highlight the increasing use of CRMD in elderly patients, and the lifelong risk of complications with these devices. Presentation can be atypical and a high index of suspicion is necessary for diagnosis.",
author = "Alla, {Venkata (Mahesh)} and Reddy, {Yeruva M.} and William Abide and Tom Hee and Hunter, {Claire B.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.4061/2010/741751",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
journal = "Cardiology Research and Practice",
issn = "2090-8016",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delayed lead perforation

T2 - Can we ever let the guard down?

AU - Alla, Venkata (Mahesh)

AU - Reddy, Yeruva M.

AU - Abide, William

AU - Hee, Tom

AU - Hunter, Claire B.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Lead perforation is a major complication of cardiac rhythm management devices (CRMD), occurring in about 1. While most lead perforations occur early, numerous instances of delayed lead perforation (occurring > 30 days after implantation) have been reported in the last few years. Only about 40 such cases have been published, with the majority occurring <1 year after implantation. Herein, we describe the case of an 84-year-old female who presented with recurrent syncope and was diagnosed to have delayed pacemaker lead perforation 4.8 years after implantation. Through this report, we intend to highlight the increasing use of CRMD in elderly patients, and the lifelong risk of complications with these devices. Presentation can be atypical and a high index of suspicion is necessary for diagnosis.

AB - Lead perforation is a major complication of cardiac rhythm management devices (CRMD), occurring in about 1. While most lead perforations occur early, numerous instances of delayed lead perforation (occurring > 30 days after implantation) have been reported in the last few years. Only about 40 such cases have been published, with the majority occurring <1 year after implantation. Herein, we describe the case of an 84-year-old female who presented with recurrent syncope and was diagnosed to have delayed pacemaker lead perforation 4.8 years after implantation. Through this report, we intend to highlight the increasing use of CRMD in elderly patients, and the lifelong risk of complications with these devices. Presentation can be atypical and a high index of suspicion is necessary for diagnosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959477876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959477876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4061/2010/741751

DO - 10.4061/2010/741751

M3 - Article

C2 - 20811487

AN - SCOPUS:79959477876

VL - 1

JO - Cardiology Research and Practice

JF - Cardiology Research and Practice

SN - 2090-8016

IS - 1

M1 - 741751

ER -