Abstract
The reexamination of Dempster's formulation of upper and lower probabilities in terms of inverse mappings and probability theory was discussed. Dempster determined that for an arbitary event, the best we could do was to determine an upper and lower probability. He also concluded that the true probability remains bounded by these two vales. The reinterpretation of the formulation by Shafer in terms of evidence theory was also discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 6th Joint Conference on Information Sciences, JCIS 2002 |
| Editors | J.H. Caulfield, S.H. Chen, H.D. Cheng, R. Duro, J.H. Caufield, S.H. Chen, H.D. Cheng, R. Duro, V. Honavar |
| Pages | 137-140 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Volume | 6 |
| State | Published - 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | Proceedings of the 6th Joint Conference on Information Sciences, JCIS 2002 - Research Triange Park, NC, United States Duration: Mar 8 2002 → Mar 13 2002 |
Other
| Other | Proceedings of the 6th Joint Conference on Information Sciences, JCIS 2002 |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| City | Research Triange Park, NC |
| Period | 3/8/02 → 3/13/02 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Computer Science(all)
Cite this
Dempster ≠ Shafer. / Wierman, Mark J.
Proceedings of the 6th Joint Conference on Information Sciences, JCIS 2002. ed. / J.H. Caulfield; S.H. Chen; H.D. Cheng; R. Duro; J.H. Caufield; S.H. Chen; H.D. Cheng; R. Duro; V. Honavar. Vol. 6 2002. p. 137-140.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Dempster ≠ Shafer
AU - Wierman, Mark J.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - The reexamination of Dempster's formulation of upper and lower probabilities in terms of inverse mappings and probability theory was discussed. Dempster determined that for an arbitary event, the best we could do was to determine an upper and lower probability. He also concluded that the true probability remains bounded by these two vales. The reinterpretation of the formulation by Shafer in terms of evidence theory was also discussed.
AB - The reexamination of Dempster's formulation of upper and lower probabilities in terms of inverse mappings and probability theory was discussed. Dempster determined that for an arbitary event, the best we could do was to determine an upper and lower probability. He also concluded that the true probability remains bounded by these two vales. The reinterpretation of the formulation by Shafer in terms of evidence theory was also discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642415872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642415872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:1642415872
SN - 0970789017
VL - 6
SP - 137
EP - 140
BT - Proceedings of the 6th Joint Conference on Information Sciences, JCIS 2002
A2 - Caulfield, J.H.
A2 - Chen, S.H.
A2 - Cheng, H.D.
A2 - Duro, R.
A2 - Caufield, J.H.
A2 - Chen, S.H.
A2 - Cheng, H.D.
A2 - Duro, R.
A2 - Honavar, V.
ER -