Dialectics of mourning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, I look at three different perspectives on mourning in recent European thought. First, I consider Freud's discussion in "Mourning and Melancholia" and other writings. Next, I look at Roland Barthes, whose book on photography, Camera Lucida, is itself a work of mourning for his late mother; and Jacques Derrida, who in Memoires for Paul de Man and The Work of Mourning memorializes departed friends and describes the ambiguities of mourning that constrain us. I argue that Freud was mistaken: mourning is not structured in terms of investment and loss. Barthes and Derrida clarify the complexities of mourning, but mourning is intractable and resists all sublimation: It is for the self, but it is also for the departed, who is neither "present" nor "absent" in the ordinary sense of these terms. Hanging on and letting go are both inappropriate responses to bereavement - how then should we mourn?

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-191
Number of pages13
JournalAngelaki
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2015

Fingerprint

sublimation
photography
dialectics
present
Dialectics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Philosophy
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

Dialectics of mourning. / White, Richard J.

In: Angelaki, Vol. 20, No. 4, 02.10.2015, p. 179-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

White, Richard J. / Dialectics of mourning. In: Angelaki. 2015 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 179-191.
@article{14b9c5388fd842538092a7b5e80523d9,
title = "Dialectics of mourning",
abstract = "In this paper, I look at three different perspectives on mourning in recent European thought. First, I consider Freud's discussion in {"}Mourning and Melancholia{"} and other writings. Next, I look at Roland Barthes, whose book on photography, Camera Lucida, is itself a work of mourning for his late mother; and Jacques Derrida, who in Memoires for Paul de Man and The Work of Mourning memorializes departed friends and describes the ambiguities of mourning that constrain us. I argue that Freud was mistaken: mourning is not structured in terms of investment and loss. Barthes and Derrida clarify the complexities of mourning, but mourning is intractable and resists all sublimation: It is for the self, but it is also for the departed, who is neither {"}present{"} nor {"}absent{"} in the ordinary sense of these terms. Hanging on and letting go are both inappropriate responses to bereavement - how then should we mourn?",
author = "White, {Richard J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/0969725X.2015.1096644",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "179--191",
journal = "Angelaki",
issn = "0969-725X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dialectics of mourning

AU - White, Richard J.

PY - 2015/10/2

Y1 - 2015/10/2

N2 - In this paper, I look at three different perspectives on mourning in recent European thought. First, I consider Freud's discussion in "Mourning and Melancholia" and other writings. Next, I look at Roland Barthes, whose book on photography, Camera Lucida, is itself a work of mourning for his late mother; and Jacques Derrida, who in Memoires for Paul de Man and The Work of Mourning memorializes departed friends and describes the ambiguities of mourning that constrain us. I argue that Freud was mistaken: mourning is not structured in terms of investment and loss. Barthes and Derrida clarify the complexities of mourning, but mourning is intractable and resists all sublimation: It is for the self, but it is also for the departed, who is neither "present" nor "absent" in the ordinary sense of these terms. Hanging on and letting go are both inappropriate responses to bereavement - how then should we mourn?

AB - In this paper, I look at three different perspectives on mourning in recent European thought. First, I consider Freud's discussion in "Mourning and Melancholia" and other writings. Next, I look at Roland Barthes, whose book on photography, Camera Lucida, is itself a work of mourning for his late mother; and Jacques Derrida, who in Memoires for Paul de Man and The Work of Mourning memorializes departed friends and describes the ambiguities of mourning that constrain us. I argue that Freud was mistaken: mourning is not structured in terms of investment and loss. Barthes and Derrida clarify the complexities of mourning, but mourning is intractable and resists all sublimation: It is for the self, but it is also for the departed, who is neither "present" nor "absent" in the ordinary sense of these terms. Hanging on and letting go are both inappropriate responses to bereavement - how then should we mourn?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946841935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946841935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0969725X.2015.1096644

DO - 10.1080/0969725X.2015.1096644

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84946841935

VL - 20

SP - 179

EP - 191

JO - Angelaki

JF - Angelaki

SN - 0969-725X

IS - 4

ER -