Differential reliance on performance outliers in athletic self-assessment

Corey L. Guenther, Sarah G. Taylor, Mark D. Alicke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The current studies tested the hypothesis that, despite experiencing high rates of performance failure, athletes maintain positive ability perceptions by basing assessments of their ability on peak, rarely occurring performances rather than on their more typically occurring base rate averages. Findings from two studies support this assertion. Study 1 showed that collegiate baseball players perceived their best-ever hitting performance to better represent their true hitting ability than their worst-ever performance, despite the latter being far more reflective of their objective batting average. Study 2 replicated this effect among college softball players, and demonstrated further that low-performing athletes were the most severely miscalibrated in their ability perceptions. Implications for coaches, trainers, and practitioners committed to helping athletes develop are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)374-382
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume45
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Sports
Athletes
Baseball
Self-Assessment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Differential reliance on performance outliers in athletic self-assessment. / Guenther, Corey L.; Taylor, Sarah G.; Alicke, Mark D.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 45, No. 7, 01.07.2015, p. 374-382.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fbcda528859749b08cde2c9433965e0a,
title = "Differential reliance on performance outliers in athletic self-assessment",
abstract = "The current studies tested the hypothesis that, despite experiencing high rates of performance failure, athletes maintain positive ability perceptions by basing assessments of their ability on peak, rarely occurring performances rather than on their more typically occurring base rate averages. Findings from two studies support this assertion. Study 1 showed that collegiate baseball players perceived their best-ever hitting performance to better represent their true hitting ability than their worst-ever performance, despite the latter being far more reflective of their objective batting average. Study 2 replicated this effect among college softball players, and demonstrated further that low-performing athletes were the most severely miscalibrated in their ability perceptions. Implications for coaches, trainers, and practitioners committed to helping athletes develop are discussed.",
author = "Guenther, {Corey L.} and Taylor, {Sarah G.} and Alicke, {Mark D.}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jasp.12303",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "374--382",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential reliance on performance outliers in athletic self-assessment

AU - Guenther, Corey L.

AU - Taylor, Sarah G.

AU - Alicke, Mark D.

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - The current studies tested the hypothesis that, despite experiencing high rates of performance failure, athletes maintain positive ability perceptions by basing assessments of their ability on peak, rarely occurring performances rather than on their more typically occurring base rate averages. Findings from two studies support this assertion. Study 1 showed that collegiate baseball players perceived their best-ever hitting performance to better represent their true hitting ability than their worst-ever performance, despite the latter being far more reflective of their objective batting average. Study 2 replicated this effect among college softball players, and demonstrated further that low-performing athletes were the most severely miscalibrated in their ability perceptions. Implications for coaches, trainers, and practitioners committed to helping athletes develop are discussed.

AB - The current studies tested the hypothesis that, despite experiencing high rates of performance failure, athletes maintain positive ability perceptions by basing assessments of their ability on peak, rarely occurring performances rather than on their more typically occurring base rate averages. Findings from two studies support this assertion. Study 1 showed that collegiate baseball players perceived their best-ever hitting performance to better represent their true hitting ability than their worst-ever performance, despite the latter being far more reflective of their objective batting average. Study 2 replicated this effect among college softball players, and demonstrated further that low-performing athletes were the most severely miscalibrated in their ability perceptions. Implications for coaches, trainers, and practitioners committed to helping athletes develop are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84935741263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84935741263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jasp.12303

DO - 10.1111/jasp.12303

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84935741263

VL - 45

SP - 374

EP - 382

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 7

ER -