Discovery Learning in Management Education

Design and Case Analysis

Daniel Druckman, Noam Ebner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two approaches to the process of guided discovery learning are compared for their impacts on concept understanding. One, referred to as design, emphasizes invention and draws on the simulation literature. The other, referred to as case analysis, focuses on discovery and draws on the case-based reasoning literature. Following a lecture on four cognitive-bias concepts, management students were assigned randomly to a design, case analysis, or lecture-only condition: A first experiment compared a design with a lecture-only condition and a second experiment compared case analysis with a lecture-only condition. Both design and case analysis students understood the concepts better than lecture-only students. Designers in the first experiment retained their understanding of the concepts better than the case analysts in the second experiment. The impacts on learning for design were similar to those obtained in earlier research where design was compared with role-playing and a classroom lecture. Implications of the findings for theory development and practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)347-374
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Management Education
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

experiment
management
learning
education
student
development theory
invention
research planning
classroom
simulation
Management education
Case analysis
trend
Experiment
literature
Theory development
Design research
Analysts
Invention
Case-based reasoning

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Discovery Learning in Management Education : Design and Case Analysis. / Druckman, Daniel; Ebner, Noam.

In: Journal of Management Education, Vol. 42, No. 3, 01.06.2018, p. 347-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8fcde2777384a79960788ea3ff522a9,
title = "Discovery Learning in Management Education: Design and Case Analysis",
abstract = "Two approaches to the process of guided discovery learning are compared for their impacts on concept understanding. One, referred to as design, emphasizes invention and draws on the simulation literature. The other, referred to as case analysis, focuses on discovery and draws on the case-based reasoning literature. Following a lecture on four cognitive-bias concepts, management students were assigned randomly to a design, case analysis, or lecture-only condition: A first experiment compared a design with a lecture-only condition and a second experiment compared case analysis with a lecture-only condition. Both design and case analysis students understood the concepts better than lecture-only students. Designers in the first experiment retained their understanding of the concepts better than the case analysts in the second experiment. The impacts on learning for design were similar to those obtained in earlier research where design was compared with role-playing and a classroom lecture. Implications of the findings for theory development and practice are discussed.",
author = "Daniel Druckman and Noam Ebner",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1052562917720710",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "347--374",
journal = "Journal of Management Education",
issn = "1052-5629",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discovery Learning in Management Education

T2 - Design and Case Analysis

AU - Druckman, Daniel

AU - Ebner, Noam

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Two approaches to the process of guided discovery learning are compared for their impacts on concept understanding. One, referred to as design, emphasizes invention and draws on the simulation literature. The other, referred to as case analysis, focuses on discovery and draws on the case-based reasoning literature. Following a lecture on four cognitive-bias concepts, management students were assigned randomly to a design, case analysis, or lecture-only condition: A first experiment compared a design with a lecture-only condition and a second experiment compared case analysis with a lecture-only condition. Both design and case analysis students understood the concepts better than lecture-only students. Designers in the first experiment retained their understanding of the concepts better than the case analysts in the second experiment. The impacts on learning for design were similar to those obtained in earlier research where design was compared with role-playing and a classroom lecture. Implications of the findings for theory development and practice are discussed.

AB - Two approaches to the process of guided discovery learning are compared for their impacts on concept understanding. One, referred to as design, emphasizes invention and draws on the simulation literature. The other, referred to as case analysis, focuses on discovery and draws on the case-based reasoning literature. Following a lecture on four cognitive-bias concepts, management students were assigned randomly to a design, case analysis, or lecture-only condition: A first experiment compared a design with a lecture-only condition and a second experiment compared case analysis with a lecture-only condition. Both design and case analysis students understood the concepts better than lecture-only students. Designers in the first experiment retained their understanding of the concepts better than the case analysts in the second experiment. The impacts on learning for design were similar to those obtained in earlier research where design was compared with role-playing and a classroom lecture. Implications of the findings for theory development and practice are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046795771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046795771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1052562917720710

DO - 10.1177/1052562917720710

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 347

EP - 374

JO - Journal of Management Education

JF - Journal of Management Education

SN - 1052-5629

IS - 3

ER -