Abstract
Morbidity and mortality alone are not sufficient outcome measures in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions aimed at controlling or reducing complications of coronary heart disease. Outcomes are considered to be indicators of the quality of care. As a result, the selection of interventions, treatments, and reimbursement for services has become outcome driven. The purpose of this article is to discuss generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life tools and how to select appropriate tools for measuring long-term outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation. Choosing the appropriate tools to evaluate outcomes is critical for evaluation of patient progress and quality of life and for the success of cardiac rehabilitation programs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 78-84 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Outcomes management for nursing practice |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 2000 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
Discussion of generic and disease-specific outcome tools for patients in cardiac rehabilitation. / Abbott, Amy A.
In: Outcomes management for nursing practice, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2000, p. 78-84.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Discussion of generic and disease-specific outcome tools for patients in cardiac rehabilitation.
AU - Abbott, Amy A.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Morbidity and mortality alone are not sufficient outcome measures in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions aimed at controlling or reducing complications of coronary heart disease. Outcomes are considered to be indicators of the quality of care. As a result, the selection of interventions, treatments, and reimbursement for services has become outcome driven. The purpose of this article is to discuss generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life tools and how to select appropriate tools for measuring long-term outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation. Choosing the appropriate tools to evaluate outcomes is critical for evaluation of patient progress and quality of life and for the success of cardiac rehabilitation programs.
AB - Morbidity and mortality alone are not sufficient outcome measures in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions aimed at controlling or reducing complications of coronary heart disease. Outcomes are considered to be indicators of the quality of care. As a result, the selection of interventions, treatments, and reimbursement for services has become outcome driven. The purpose of this article is to discuss generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life tools and how to select appropriate tools for measuring long-term outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation. Choosing the appropriate tools to evaluate outcomes is critical for evaluation of patient progress and quality of life and for the success of cardiac rehabilitation programs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034174984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034174984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 11111588
AN - SCOPUS:0034174984
VL - 4
SP - 78
EP - 84
JO - Outcomes management for nursing practice
JF - Outcomes management for nursing practice
SN - 1093-1783
IS - 2
ER -