Disentangling Diffusion

The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion

Frederick J. Boehmke, Richard C. Witmer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

148 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When modeling regional policy diffusion effects, scholars have traditionally made appeals to both social learning and economic competition as causes of diffusion. In their empirical studies of policy adoption, however, they do not attempt to determine which of these two processes are at work. In this article, we argue that these two types of diffusion may have different implications for when a state first adopts a policy and subsequent changes in the extent of that policy and that these effects vary by policy area. In the specific policy area that we study, Indian gaming, we expect social learning diffusion to influence adoption but not expansion; economic competition should influence both policy adoption and policy expansion. Our empirical results confirm these predictions. To study both policy adoption and innovation, we apply models for event counts to state policy data, which allows us to model the extent of policy adoption over time, rather than just the timing of first adoption as is common with event history models.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-51
Number of pages13
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume57
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

innovation policy
social learning
social economics
policy area
policy studies
event
regional policy
appeal
innovation
cause
economics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Disentangling Diffusion : The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion. / Boehmke, Frederick J.; Witmer, Richard C.

In: Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 1, 03.2004, p. 39-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{9f13bf4144964d508353bdd5d380d15e,
title = "Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion",
abstract = "When modeling regional policy diffusion effects, scholars have traditionally made appeals to both social learning and economic competition as causes of diffusion. In their empirical studies of policy adoption, however, they do not attempt to determine which of these two processes are at work. In this article, we argue that these two types of diffusion may have different implications for when a state first adopts a policy and subsequent changes in the extent of that policy and that these effects vary by policy area. In the specific policy area that we study, Indian gaming, we expect social learning diffusion to influence adoption but not expansion; economic competition should influence both policy adoption and policy expansion. Our empirical results confirm these predictions. To study both policy adoption and innovation, we apply models for event counts to state policy data, which allows us to model the extent of policy adoption over time, rather than just the timing of first adoption as is common with event history models.",
author = "Boehmke, {Frederick J.} and Witmer, {Richard C.}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "39--51",
journal = "Political Research Quarterly",
issn = "1065-9129",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling Diffusion

T2 - The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion

AU - Boehmke, Frederick J.

AU - Witmer, Richard C.

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - When modeling regional policy diffusion effects, scholars have traditionally made appeals to both social learning and economic competition as causes of diffusion. In their empirical studies of policy adoption, however, they do not attempt to determine which of these two processes are at work. In this article, we argue that these two types of diffusion may have different implications for when a state first adopts a policy and subsequent changes in the extent of that policy and that these effects vary by policy area. In the specific policy area that we study, Indian gaming, we expect social learning diffusion to influence adoption but not expansion; economic competition should influence both policy adoption and policy expansion. Our empirical results confirm these predictions. To study both policy adoption and innovation, we apply models for event counts to state policy data, which allows us to model the extent of policy adoption over time, rather than just the timing of first adoption as is common with event history models.

AB - When modeling regional policy diffusion effects, scholars have traditionally made appeals to both social learning and economic competition as causes of diffusion. In their empirical studies of policy adoption, however, they do not attempt to determine which of these two processes are at work. In this article, we argue that these two types of diffusion may have different implications for when a state first adopts a policy and subsequent changes in the extent of that policy and that these effects vary by policy area. In the specific policy area that we study, Indian gaming, we expect social learning diffusion to influence adoption but not expansion; economic competition should influence both policy adoption and policy expansion. Our empirical results confirm these predictions. To study both policy adoption and innovation, we apply models for event counts to state policy data, which allows us to model the extent of policy adoption over time, rather than just the timing of first adoption as is common with event history models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2142761167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2142761167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 57

SP - 39

EP - 51

JO - Political Research Quarterly

JF - Political Research Quarterly

SN - 1065-9129

IS - 1

ER -