Disrupting genetic dogma

Bridging cytogenetics and molecular biology in fragile X research

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Historians of science, reflecting the disciplinary divides of their actors, have largely examined cytogenetics and molecular biology in separate contributions. In recent years, however, as the historical analysis of postwar genetics has begun to shift toward a focus on the late twentieth century, these distinctions have become increasingly impractical. This paper examines the collaborative use of cytogenetic and molecular analysis by research groups as they examined a unique chromosomal marker associated with inherited intellectual disability, known as the fragile X site. As clinicians and biologists studied the fragile X site during the early 1980s, they noted its unusual behavior under the microscope and in family pedigrees. These findings greatly complicated attempts to use the chromosomally visible fragile X site to warn female carriers and identify fetuses affected by fragile X syndrome, leading to the recruitment of molecular biologists to develop improved diagnostic techniques. Molecular biologists were also drawn to study the fragile X site by the potential basic research implications of its unusual behavior. Collaborating across international and interdisciplinary divides, cytogeneticists and molecular biologists established the fragile X site as a novel and unanticipated example of genomic instability. During the 1980s, cytogenetic and molecular examination of the fragile X site contributed significantly to disrupting the longstanding genetic dogma of intergeneration stability, and demonstrated the role of genomic dynamism in the development of diseasecausing mutations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174-197
Number of pages24
JournalHistorical Studies in the Natural Sciences
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Cytogenetics
Molecular Biology
Dogma
1980s
Mutation
Diagnostics
Carrier
Visible
Historical Analysis
Basic Research
Clinicians
Microscope
Syndrome
Historians of Science
Dynamism
Fetus
Research Groups
Intellectual Disability

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Disrupting genetic dogma : Bridging cytogenetics and molecular biology in fragile X research. / Hogan, Andrew J.

In: Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.02.2015, p. 174-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{f417d7e41da64b0b96a5b3b07c4de6c1,
title = "Disrupting genetic dogma: Bridging cytogenetics and molecular biology in fragile X research",
abstract = "Historians of science, reflecting the disciplinary divides of their actors, have largely examined cytogenetics and molecular biology in separate contributions. In recent years, however, as the historical analysis of postwar genetics has begun to shift toward a focus on the late twentieth century, these distinctions have become increasingly impractical. This paper examines the collaborative use of cytogenetic and molecular analysis by research groups as they examined a unique chromosomal marker associated with inherited intellectual disability, known as the fragile X site. As clinicians and biologists studied the fragile X site during the early 1980s, they noted its unusual behavior under the microscope and in family pedigrees. These findings greatly complicated attempts to use the chromosomally visible fragile X site to warn female carriers and identify fetuses affected by fragile X syndrome, leading to the recruitment of molecular biologists to develop improved diagnostic techniques. Molecular biologists were also drawn to study the fragile X site by the potential basic research implications of its unusual behavior. Collaborating across international and interdisciplinary divides, cytogeneticists and molecular biologists established the fragile X site as a novel and unanticipated example of genomic instability. During the 1980s, cytogenetic and molecular examination of the fragile X site contributed significantly to disrupting the longstanding genetic dogma of intergeneration stability, and demonstrated the role of genomic dynamism in the development of diseasecausing mutations.",
author = "Hogan, {Andrew J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1525/hsns.2015.45.1.174",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "174--197",
journal = "Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences",
issn = "1939-1811",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disrupting genetic dogma

T2 - Bridging cytogenetics and molecular biology in fragile X research

AU - Hogan, Andrew J.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Historians of science, reflecting the disciplinary divides of their actors, have largely examined cytogenetics and molecular biology in separate contributions. In recent years, however, as the historical analysis of postwar genetics has begun to shift toward a focus on the late twentieth century, these distinctions have become increasingly impractical. This paper examines the collaborative use of cytogenetic and molecular analysis by research groups as they examined a unique chromosomal marker associated with inherited intellectual disability, known as the fragile X site. As clinicians and biologists studied the fragile X site during the early 1980s, they noted its unusual behavior under the microscope and in family pedigrees. These findings greatly complicated attempts to use the chromosomally visible fragile X site to warn female carriers and identify fetuses affected by fragile X syndrome, leading to the recruitment of molecular biologists to develop improved diagnostic techniques. Molecular biologists were also drawn to study the fragile X site by the potential basic research implications of its unusual behavior. Collaborating across international and interdisciplinary divides, cytogeneticists and molecular biologists established the fragile X site as a novel and unanticipated example of genomic instability. During the 1980s, cytogenetic and molecular examination of the fragile X site contributed significantly to disrupting the longstanding genetic dogma of intergeneration stability, and demonstrated the role of genomic dynamism in the development of diseasecausing mutations.

AB - Historians of science, reflecting the disciplinary divides of their actors, have largely examined cytogenetics and molecular biology in separate contributions. In recent years, however, as the historical analysis of postwar genetics has begun to shift toward a focus on the late twentieth century, these distinctions have become increasingly impractical. This paper examines the collaborative use of cytogenetic and molecular analysis by research groups as they examined a unique chromosomal marker associated with inherited intellectual disability, known as the fragile X site. As clinicians and biologists studied the fragile X site during the early 1980s, they noted its unusual behavior under the microscope and in family pedigrees. These findings greatly complicated attempts to use the chromosomally visible fragile X site to warn female carriers and identify fetuses affected by fragile X syndrome, leading to the recruitment of molecular biologists to develop improved diagnostic techniques. Molecular biologists were also drawn to study the fragile X site by the potential basic research implications of its unusual behavior. Collaborating across international and interdisciplinary divides, cytogeneticists and molecular biologists established the fragile X site as a novel and unanticipated example of genomic instability. During the 1980s, cytogenetic and molecular examination of the fragile X site contributed significantly to disrupting the longstanding genetic dogma of intergeneration stability, and demonstrated the role of genomic dynamism in the development of diseasecausing mutations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922669582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922669582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/hsns.2015.45.1.174

DO - 10.1525/hsns.2015.45.1.174

M3 - Review article

VL - 45

SP - 174

EP - 197

JO - Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences

JF - Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences

SN - 1939-1811

IS - 1

ER -