Do male crickets strategically adjust the number and viability of their sperm under sperm competition?

Amy Worthington, Brian E. Gress, Abigail A. Neyer, Clint D. Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sperm competition theory predicts that males should strategically adjust sperm ejaculate expenditure according to the number of competing ejaculates, because sperm production is costly. That is, males should provide females with larger or higher-quality ejaculates when one rival male is present, but decrease ejaculate size or quality as the number of rivals exceeds one. We tested this hypothesis in the laboratory by subjecting male domestic crickets (. Acheta domesticus) to increased sperm competition risk (one rival male) or intensity (two rival males) and then measuring total sperm number and viability (proportion of living sperm) of the ejaculate. In addition, we tested whether male ejaculate expenditure covaried with their own or their mate's phenotypic quality. Contrary to theoretical predictions, males did not prudently adjust the number of sperm they transferred to mates based on either sperm competition risk or intensity. We also found that smaller males had higher proportions of living sperm in their ejaculate relative to larger males, suggesting that male A.domesticus can adjust their ejaculate quality based on their perceived reproductive prospects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-60
Number of pages6
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

sperm competition
cricket
Gryllidae
sperm
viability
spermatozoa
expenditure
Acheta domesticus

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Do male crickets strategically adjust the number and viability of their sperm under sperm competition? / Worthington, Amy; Gress, Brian E.; Neyer, Abigail A.; Kelly, Clint D.

In: Animal Behaviour, Vol. 86, No. 1, 01.07.2013, p. 55-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Worthington, Amy ; Gress, Brian E. ; Neyer, Abigail A. ; Kelly, Clint D. / Do male crickets strategically adjust the number and viability of their sperm under sperm competition?. In: Animal Behaviour. 2013 ; Vol. 86, No. 1. pp. 55-60.
@article{585c054c84c14907aa862089d05420fa,
title = "Do male crickets strategically adjust the number and viability of their sperm under sperm competition?",
abstract = "Sperm competition theory predicts that males should strategically adjust sperm ejaculate expenditure according to the number of competing ejaculates, because sperm production is costly. That is, males should provide females with larger or higher-quality ejaculates when one rival male is present, but decrease ejaculate size or quality as the number of rivals exceeds one. We tested this hypothesis in the laboratory by subjecting male domestic crickets (. Acheta domesticus) to increased sperm competition risk (one rival male) or intensity (two rival males) and then measuring total sperm number and viability (proportion of living sperm) of the ejaculate. In addition, we tested whether male ejaculate expenditure covaried with their own or their mate's phenotypic quality. Contrary to theoretical predictions, males did not prudently adjust the number of sperm they transferred to mates based on either sperm competition risk or intensity. We also found that smaller males had higher proportions of living sperm in their ejaculate relative to larger males, suggesting that male A.domesticus can adjust their ejaculate quality based on their perceived reproductive prospects.",
author = "Amy Worthington and Gress, {Brian E.} and Neyer, {Abigail A.} and Kelly, {Clint D.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.04.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "55--60",
journal = "Animal Behaviour",
issn = "0003-3472",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do male crickets strategically adjust the number and viability of their sperm under sperm competition?

AU - Worthington, Amy

AU - Gress, Brian E.

AU - Neyer, Abigail A.

AU - Kelly, Clint D.

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - Sperm competition theory predicts that males should strategically adjust sperm ejaculate expenditure according to the number of competing ejaculates, because sperm production is costly. That is, males should provide females with larger or higher-quality ejaculates when one rival male is present, but decrease ejaculate size or quality as the number of rivals exceeds one. We tested this hypothesis in the laboratory by subjecting male domestic crickets (. Acheta domesticus) to increased sperm competition risk (one rival male) or intensity (two rival males) and then measuring total sperm number and viability (proportion of living sperm) of the ejaculate. In addition, we tested whether male ejaculate expenditure covaried with their own or their mate's phenotypic quality. Contrary to theoretical predictions, males did not prudently adjust the number of sperm they transferred to mates based on either sperm competition risk or intensity. We also found that smaller males had higher proportions of living sperm in their ejaculate relative to larger males, suggesting that male A.domesticus can adjust their ejaculate quality based on their perceived reproductive prospects.

AB - Sperm competition theory predicts that males should strategically adjust sperm ejaculate expenditure according to the number of competing ejaculates, because sperm production is costly. That is, males should provide females with larger or higher-quality ejaculates when one rival male is present, but decrease ejaculate size or quality as the number of rivals exceeds one. We tested this hypothesis in the laboratory by subjecting male domestic crickets (. Acheta domesticus) to increased sperm competition risk (one rival male) or intensity (two rival males) and then measuring total sperm number and viability (proportion of living sperm) of the ejaculate. In addition, we tested whether male ejaculate expenditure covaried with their own or their mate's phenotypic quality. Contrary to theoretical predictions, males did not prudently adjust the number of sperm they transferred to mates based on either sperm competition risk or intensity. We also found that smaller males had higher proportions of living sperm in their ejaculate relative to larger males, suggesting that male A.domesticus can adjust their ejaculate quality based on their perceived reproductive prospects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880172728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880172728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.04.010

DO - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.04.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880172728

VL - 86

SP - 55

EP - 60

JO - Animal Behaviour

JF - Animal Behaviour

SN - 0003-3472

IS - 1

ER -