Does a patient’s trauma history ethically justify a discriminatory clinical referral?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article analyzes a child psychiatrist’s referral approach when the patient’s care must be transferred to an adult psychiatrist and the otherwise best adult psychiatrist has “accented” language, which is associated with the patient’s prior trauma. The analysis considers the value of simplicity and a related “simplicity strategy,” revealing that many ethical factors lay behind the simplicity approach. The inquiry then addresses simplicity regarding practical wisdom and context. The paper argues that simplicity should mean considering just what’s relevant and no more. Applied to the case, simplicity includes respect for persons, openness, honesty, trustworthiness, beneficence, nonmaleficence, ethics of care, professional empathy, group inquiry, epistemic humility, and justice. An objection regarding undue complexity is noted and refuted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E493-E498
JournalAMA Journal of Ethics
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

psychiatrist
Beneficence
Psychiatry
trauma
Referral and Consultation
Wounds and Injuries
Professional Ethics
trustworthiness
Social Justice
empathy
patient care
wisdom
respect
Patient Care
Language
justice
moral philosophy
human being
language
Values

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Does a patient’s trauma history ethically justify a discriminatory clinical referral? / Stone, John R.

In: AMA Journal of Ethics, Vol. 21, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. E493-E498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bcccaca860584b9ba21ce5f567a663f0,
title = "Does a patient’s trauma history ethically justify a discriminatory clinical referral?",
abstract = "This article analyzes a child psychiatrist’s referral approach when the patient’s care must be transferred to an adult psychiatrist and the otherwise best adult psychiatrist has “accented” language, which is associated with the patient’s prior trauma. The analysis considers the value of simplicity and a related “simplicity strategy,” revealing that many ethical factors lay behind the simplicity approach. The inquiry then addresses simplicity regarding practical wisdom and context. The paper argues that simplicity should mean considering just what’s relevant and no more. Applied to the case, simplicity includes respect for persons, openness, honesty, trustworthiness, beneficence, nonmaleficence, ethics of care, professional empathy, group inquiry, epistemic humility, and justice. An objection regarding undue complexity is noted and refuted.",
author = "Stone, {John R.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/amajethics.2019.493",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "E493--E498",
journal = "AMA journal of ethics",
issn = "2376-6980",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does a patient’s trauma history ethically justify a discriminatory clinical referral?

AU - Stone, John R.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - This article analyzes a child psychiatrist’s referral approach when the patient’s care must be transferred to an adult psychiatrist and the otherwise best adult psychiatrist has “accented” language, which is associated with the patient’s prior trauma. The analysis considers the value of simplicity and a related “simplicity strategy,” revealing that many ethical factors lay behind the simplicity approach. The inquiry then addresses simplicity regarding practical wisdom and context. The paper argues that simplicity should mean considering just what’s relevant and no more. Applied to the case, simplicity includes respect for persons, openness, honesty, trustworthiness, beneficence, nonmaleficence, ethics of care, professional empathy, group inquiry, epistemic humility, and justice. An objection regarding undue complexity is noted and refuted.

AB - This article analyzes a child psychiatrist’s referral approach when the patient’s care must be transferred to an adult psychiatrist and the otherwise best adult psychiatrist has “accented” language, which is associated with the patient’s prior trauma. The analysis considers the value of simplicity and a related “simplicity strategy,” revealing that many ethical factors lay behind the simplicity approach. The inquiry then addresses simplicity regarding practical wisdom and context. The paper argues that simplicity should mean considering just what’s relevant and no more. Applied to the case, simplicity includes respect for persons, openness, honesty, trustworthiness, beneficence, nonmaleficence, ethics of care, professional empathy, group inquiry, epistemic humility, and justice. An objection regarding undue complexity is noted and refuted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068211820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068211820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/amajethics.2019.493

DO - 10.1001/amajethics.2019.493

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - E493-E498

JO - AMA journal of ethics

JF - AMA journal of ethics

SN - 2376-6980

IS - 6

ER -