Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives

Edward J. Swift, Peter T. Triolo, Wayne W. Barkmeier, Jason L. Bird, Steven J. Bounds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the use of low-viscosity intermediate resins (LVR) reduces microleakage of dental adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: Wedge-shaped Class V cavities were prepared in sound extracted molars. Occlusal margins were in enamel and gingival margins were in dentin/cementum. Five adhesive systems (All-Bond 2, Clearfil Liner Bond 2, OptiBond, Prime & Bond and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose) were applied to the preparations strictly according to manufacturers' directions on one side of the tooth and with the addition of LVR (OptiBond FL Adhesive or Protect Liner F) on the other. All cavities were restored with Z100 resin composite. Specimens were then stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours, thermocycled 800x, stained with silver nitrate, sectioned, and evaluated for leakage. Marginal penetration of silver nitrate was scored on 0-3 scale. Results: Statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA) revealed a significant difference (P<0.0001) in leakage at dentin margins. Multiple pairwise comparisons of control groups revealed considerable overlapping between groups, but with a trend toward less leakage by OptiBond and Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Leakage of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose was significantly reduced when Protect Liner F was used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-104
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Dentistry
Volume9
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dental Cements
Silver Nitrate
Dentin
Viscosity
Dental Cementum
Dental Enamel
Adhesives
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Control Groups
Water
Scotchbond Multi-Purpose
Clearfil Liner Bond 2
Optibond
Protect Liner F
OptiBond FL
Z100 composite resin
All-Bond 2
Direction compound

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Swift, E. J., Triolo, P. T., Barkmeier, W. W., Bird, J. L., & Bounds, S. J. (1996). Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. American Journal of Dentistry, 9(3), 100-104.

Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. / Swift, Edward J.; Triolo, Peter T.; Barkmeier, Wayne W.; Bird, Jason L.; Bounds, Steven J.

In: American Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1996, p. 100-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Swift, EJ, Triolo, PT, Barkmeier, WW, Bird, JL & Bounds, SJ 1996, 'Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives', American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 100-104.
Swift, Edward J. ; Triolo, Peter T. ; Barkmeier, Wayne W. ; Bird, Jason L. ; Bounds, Steven J. / Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. In: American Journal of Dentistry. 1996 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 100-104.
@article{518d97742a3a49e6a0fe7c1e6b6049c4,
title = "Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine whether the use of low-viscosity intermediate resins (LVR) reduces microleakage of dental adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: Wedge-shaped Class V cavities were prepared in sound extracted molars. Occlusal margins were in enamel and gingival margins were in dentin/cementum. Five adhesive systems (All-Bond 2, Clearfil Liner Bond 2, OptiBond, Prime & Bond and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose) were applied to the preparations strictly according to manufacturers' directions on one side of the tooth and with the addition of LVR (OptiBond FL Adhesive or Protect Liner F) on the other. All cavities were restored with Z100 resin composite. Specimens were then stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours, thermocycled 800x, stained with silver nitrate, sectioned, and evaluated for leakage. Marginal penetration of silver nitrate was scored on 0-3 scale. Results: Statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA) revealed a significant difference (P<0.0001) in leakage at dentin margins. Multiple pairwise comparisons of control groups revealed considerable overlapping between groups, but with a trend toward less leakage by OptiBond and Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Leakage of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose was significantly reduced when Protect Liner F was used.",
author = "Swift, {Edward J.} and Triolo, {Peter T.} and Barkmeier, {Wayne W.} and Bird, {Jason L.} and Bounds, {Steven J.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "100--104",
journal = "American Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0894-8275",
publisher = "Mosher and Linder, Inc",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives

AU - Swift, Edward J.

AU - Triolo, Peter T.

AU - Barkmeier, Wayne W.

AU - Bird, Jason L.

AU - Bounds, Steven J.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Purpose: To determine whether the use of low-viscosity intermediate resins (LVR) reduces microleakage of dental adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: Wedge-shaped Class V cavities were prepared in sound extracted molars. Occlusal margins were in enamel and gingival margins were in dentin/cementum. Five adhesive systems (All-Bond 2, Clearfil Liner Bond 2, OptiBond, Prime & Bond and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose) were applied to the preparations strictly according to manufacturers' directions on one side of the tooth and with the addition of LVR (OptiBond FL Adhesive or Protect Liner F) on the other. All cavities were restored with Z100 resin composite. Specimens were then stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours, thermocycled 800x, stained with silver nitrate, sectioned, and evaluated for leakage. Marginal penetration of silver nitrate was scored on 0-3 scale. Results: Statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA) revealed a significant difference (P<0.0001) in leakage at dentin margins. Multiple pairwise comparisons of control groups revealed considerable overlapping between groups, but with a trend toward less leakage by OptiBond and Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Leakage of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose was significantly reduced when Protect Liner F was used.

AB - Purpose: To determine whether the use of low-viscosity intermediate resins (LVR) reduces microleakage of dental adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: Wedge-shaped Class V cavities were prepared in sound extracted molars. Occlusal margins were in enamel and gingival margins were in dentin/cementum. Five adhesive systems (All-Bond 2, Clearfil Liner Bond 2, OptiBond, Prime & Bond and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose) were applied to the preparations strictly according to manufacturers' directions on one side of the tooth and with the addition of LVR (OptiBond FL Adhesive or Protect Liner F) on the other. All cavities were restored with Z100 resin composite. Specimens were then stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours, thermocycled 800x, stained with silver nitrate, sectioned, and evaluated for leakage. Marginal penetration of silver nitrate was scored on 0-3 scale. Results: Statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA) revealed a significant difference (P<0.0001) in leakage at dentin margins. Multiple pairwise comparisons of control groups revealed considerable overlapping between groups, but with a trend toward less leakage by OptiBond and Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Leakage of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose was significantly reduced when Protect Liner F was used.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030155844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030155844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 100

EP - 104

JO - American Journal of Dentistry

JF - American Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0894-8275

IS - 3

ER -