Abstract
Psycholegal researchers have largely ignored the relevance of nonverbal auditory information in earwitness memory, nor have they compared its retention with visual or verbal information. Memory of nonverbal auditory stimuli was investigated in two different contexts. In Experiment 1, participants recalled more sounds (i.e., nonverbal auditory stimuli) than the sounds' verbal labels. However, with a more ecologically valid method in Experiment 2, participants recalled more verbal stimuli in conjunction with visual information than they did nonverbal stimuli. Even after a 1-week delay, participants' retention of the verbal-visual combination was highest.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 277-287 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of General Psychology |
| Volume | 123 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - Oct 1996 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Psychology(all)
Cite this
Effect of Modality in Earwitness Identification : Memory for Verbal and Nonverbal Auditory Stimuli Presented in Two Contexts. / Huss, Matthew T.; Weaver, Kenneth A.
In: Journal of General Psychology, Vol. 123, No. 4, 10.1996, p. 277-287.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Modality in Earwitness Identification
T2 - Memory for Verbal and Nonverbal Auditory Stimuli Presented in Two Contexts
AU - Huss, Matthew T.
AU - Weaver, Kenneth A.
PY - 1996/10
Y1 - 1996/10
N2 - Psycholegal researchers have largely ignored the relevance of nonverbal auditory information in earwitness memory, nor have they compared its retention with visual or verbal information. Memory of nonverbal auditory stimuli was investigated in two different contexts. In Experiment 1, participants recalled more sounds (i.e., nonverbal auditory stimuli) than the sounds' verbal labels. However, with a more ecologically valid method in Experiment 2, participants recalled more verbal stimuli in conjunction with visual information than they did nonverbal stimuli. Even after a 1-week delay, participants' retention of the verbal-visual combination was highest.
AB - Psycholegal researchers have largely ignored the relevance of nonverbal auditory information in earwitness memory, nor have they compared its retention with visual or verbal information. Memory of nonverbal auditory stimuli was investigated in two different contexts. In Experiment 1, participants recalled more sounds (i.e., nonverbal auditory stimuli) than the sounds' verbal labels. However, with a more ecologically valid method in Experiment 2, participants recalled more verbal stimuli in conjunction with visual information than they did nonverbal stimuli. Even after a 1-week delay, participants' retention of the verbal-visual combination was highest.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030255277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030255277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 9042739
AN - SCOPUS:0030255277
VL - 123
SP - 277
EP - 287
JO - Journal of General Psychology
JF - Journal of General Psychology
SN - 0022-1309
IS - 4
ER -