Effect of Modality in Earwitness Identification: Memory for Verbal and Nonverbal Auditory Stimuli Presented in Two Contexts

Matthew T. Huss, Kenneth A. Weaver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Psycholegal researchers have largely ignored the relevance of nonverbal auditory information in earwitness memory, nor have they compared its retention with visual or verbal information. Memory of nonverbal auditory stimuli was investigated in two different contexts. In Experiment 1, participants recalled more sounds (i.e., nonverbal auditory stimuli) than the sounds' verbal labels. However, with a more ecologically valid method in Experiment 2, participants recalled more verbal stimuli in conjunction with visual information than they did nonverbal stimuli. Even after a 1-week delay, participants' retention of the verbal-visual combination was highest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-287
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of General Psychology
Volume123
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

stimulus
Research Personnel
experiment
Retention (Psychology)
Auditory Stimuli
Modality
Stimulus
Experiment
Sound

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Effect of Modality in Earwitness Identification : Memory for Verbal and Nonverbal Auditory Stimuli Presented in Two Contexts. / Huss, Matthew T.; Weaver, Kenneth A.

In: Journal of General Psychology, Vol. 123, No. 4, 10.1996, p. 277-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{135b7bfcc745481a8ea60b3884aa79a5,
title = "Effect of Modality in Earwitness Identification: Memory for Verbal and Nonverbal Auditory Stimuli Presented in Two Contexts",
abstract = "Psycholegal researchers have largely ignored the relevance of nonverbal auditory information in earwitness memory, nor have they compared its retention with visual or verbal information. Memory of nonverbal auditory stimuli was investigated in two different contexts. In Experiment 1, participants recalled more sounds (i.e., nonverbal auditory stimuli) than the sounds' verbal labels. However, with a more ecologically valid method in Experiment 2, participants recalled more verbal stimuli in conjunction with visual information than they did nonverbal stimuli. Even after a 1-week delay, participants' retention of the verbal-visual combination was highest.",
author = "Huss, {Matthew T.} and Weaver, {Kenneth A.}",
year = "1996",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "123",
pages = "277--287",
journal = "Journal of General Psychology",
issn = "0022-1309",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Modality in Earwitness Identification

T2 - Memory for Verbal and Nonverbal Auditory Stimuli Presented in Two Contexts

AU - Huss, Matthew T.

AU - Weaver, Kenneth A.

PY - 1996/10

Y1 - 1996/10

N2 - Psycholegal researchers have largely ignored the relevance of nonverbal auditory information in earwitness memory, nor have they compared its retention with visual or verbal information. Memory of nonverbal auditory stimuli was investigated in two different contexts. In Experiment 1, participants recalled more sounds (i.e., nonverbal auditory stimuli) than the sounds' verbal labels. However, with a more ecologically valid method in Experiment 2, participants recalled more verbal stimuli in conjunction with visual information than they did nonverbal stimuli. Even after a 1-week delay, participants' retention of the verbal-visual combination was highest.

AB - Psycholegal researchers have largely ignored the relevance of nonverbal auditory information in earwitness memory, nor have they compared its retention with visual or verbal information. Memory of nonverbal auditory stimuli was investigated in two different contexts. In Experiment 1, participants recalled more sounds (i.e., nonverbal auditory stimuli) than the sounds' verbal labels. However, with a more ecologically valid method in Experiment 2, participants recalled more verbal stimuli in conjunction with visual information than they did nonverbal stimuli. Even after a 1-week delay, participants' retention of the verbal-visual combination was highest.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030255277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030255277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9042739

AN - SCOPUS:0030255277

VL - 123

SP - 277

EP - 287

JO - Journal of General Psychology

JF - Journal of General Psychology

SN - 0022-1309

IS - 4

ER -