Abstract
A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain surfaces by use of a variety of treatment regimens with the All-Bond 2 adhesive system. There were significant differences in the 24-hour bond strengths between several of the surface treatment methods. The mean shear bond strength after 24 hours of water storage ranged from 10.6 ± 2.3 MPa to 25.0 ± 4.4 MPa. Nine of the surface treatment methods showed a significant decrease (p <0.05) in bond strengths after 3 months of water storage and thermocycling. After 3 months, the bond strengths ranged 0.1 ± 0.1 MPa to 17.4 ± 2.0 MPa. Porcelain surface treatment with aluminum oxide air abrasion followed by hydrofluoric acid, a silane coupling agent, and an unfilled resin produced a bond strength after 3 months' water storage and thermocycling that was significantly greater (p <0.05) than the other nine porcelain surface-treatment techniques. Visual examination of the debonded specimens generally showed cohesive failures in porcelain for the treatment groups with a mean bond strength above 13 MPa.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 355-359 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1994 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Dentistry(all)
Cite this
Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. / Thurmond, John W.; Barkmeier, Wayne W.; Wilwerding, Terry M.
In: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol. 72, No. 4, 1994, p. 355-359.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain
AU - Thurmond, John W.
AU - Barkmeier, Wayne W.
AU - Wilwerding, Terry M.
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain surfaces by use of a variety of treatment regimens with the All-Bond 2 adhesive system. There were significant differences in the 24-hour bond strengths between several of the surface treatment methods. The mean shear bond strength after 24 hours of water storage ranged from 10.6 ± 2.3 MPa to 25.0 ± 4.4 MPa. Nine of the surface treatment methods showed a significant decrease (p <0.05) in bond strengths after 3 months of water storage and thermocycling. After 3 months, the bond strengths ranged 0.1 ± 0.1 MPa to 17.4 ± 2.0 MPa. Porcelain surface treatment with aluminum oxide air abrasion followed by hydrofluoric acid, a silane coupling agent, and an unfilled resin produced a bond strength after 3 months' water storage and thermocycling that was significantly greater (p <0.05) than the other nine porcelain surface-treatment techniques. Visual examination of the debonded specimens generally showed cohesive failures in porcelain for the treatment groups with a mean bond strength above 13 MPa.
AB - A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain surfaces by use of a variety of treatment regimens with the All-Bond 2 adhesive system. There were significant differences in the 24-hour bond strengths between several of the surface treatment methods. The mean shear bond strength after 24 hours of water storage ranged from 10.6 ± 2.3 MPa to 25.0 ± 4.4 MPa. Nine of the surface treatment methods showed a significant decrease (p <0.05) in bond strengths after 3 months of water storage and thermocycling. After 3 months, the bond strengths ranged 0.1 ± 0.1 MPa to 17.4 ± 2.0 MPa. Porcelain surface treatment with aluminum oxide air abrasion followed by hydrofluoric acid, a silane coupling agent, and an unfilled resin produced a bond strength after 3 months' water storage and thermocycling that was significantly greater (p <0.05) than the other nine porcelain surface-treatment techniques. Visual examination of the debonded specimens generally showed cohesive failures in porcelain for the treatment groups with a mean bond strength above 13 MPa.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028523833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028523833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-3
DO - 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-3
M3 - Article
VL - 72
SP - 355
EP - 359
JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
SN - 0022-3913
IS - 4
ER -