Effectiveness of a sonic toothbrush in maintenance of dental implants. A prospective study

Larry Wolff, Alex Kim, Martha E. Nunn, Bashar Bakdash, James Hinrichs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study assessed the efficacy of a sonic and a manual toothbrush in reducing plaque and gingivitis around dental implants. Subjects were randomly assigned to either sonic (n=16) or manual (n=15) study groups. Groups were balanced according to baseline levels of plaque and gingivitis. The plaque (PI), gingival (GI), and bleeding (BI) indices as well as probing depths were determined at baseline, and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 week follow-up visits. Mean scores per person were calculated for each clinical parameter. Oral hygiene habits, compliance and acceptance were also evaluated over the study period. Within group comparisons from baseline throughout the study, as well as between group comparisons (i.e., sonic versus manual), were determined. Overall, plaque, gingival, and bleeding indices in both groups were lower at each follow-up visit when compared to the baseline. Within group comparisons demonstrated that both the sonic toothbrush subjects and the manual toothbrush subjects had significantly lower PI, GI, and BI scores at each post-baseline visit (4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks) than at baseline (p0.05). No implant problems (e.g., loose screws) were attributable to the sonic toothbrush. Relevant to oral hygiene habits, subjects in both groups demonstrated a high level of compliance with their assigned toothbrush. Overall, the results of this study demonstrated that sonic toothbrushing significantly reduced plaque, gingival inflammation and bleeding, and probing pocket depths around implants over the 6-month trial period. It is concluded that sonic brushing is an effective means of dental implant maintenance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)821-828
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Periodontology
Volume25
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dental Implants
Maintenance
Prospective Studies
Hemorrhage
Periodontal Index
Gingivitis
Oral Hygiene
Habits
Toothbrushing
Compliance
Inflammation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Effectiveness of a sonic toothbrush in maintenance of dental implants. A prospective study. / Wolff, Larry; Kim, Alex; Nunn, Martha E.; Bakdash, Bashar; Hinrichs, James.

In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Vol. 25, No. 10, 10.1998, p. 821-828.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wolff, Larry ; Kim, Alex ; Nunn, Martha E. ; Bakdash, Bashar ; Hinrichs, James. / Effectiveness of a sonic toothbrush in maintenance of dental implants. A prospective study. In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1998 ; Vol. 25, No. 10. pp. 821-828.
@article{cd051306be0c40349917e35eebafc557,
title = "Effectiveness of a sonic toothbrush in maintenance of dental implants. A prospective study",
abstract = "This study assessed the efficacy of a sonic and a manual toothbrush in reducing plaque and gingivitis around dental implants. Subjects were randomly assigned to either sonic (n=16) or manual (n=15) study groups. Groups were balanced according to baseline levels of plaque and gingivitis. The plaque (PI), gingival (GI), and bleeding (BI) indices as well as probing depths were determined at baseline, and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 week follow-up visits. Mean scores per person were calculated for each clinical parameter. Oral hygiene habits, compliance and acceptance were also evaluated over the study period. Within group comparisons from baseline throughout the study, as well as between group comparisons (i.e., sonic versus manual), were determined. Overall, plaque, gingival, and bleeding indices in both groups were lower at each follow-up visit when compared to the baseline. Within group comparisons demonstrated that both the sonic toothbrush subjects and the manual toothbrush subjects had significantly lower PI, GI, and BI scores at each post-baseline visit (4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks) than at baseline (p0.05). No implant problems (e.g., loose screws) were attributable to the sonic toothbrush. Relevant to oral hygiene habits, subjects in both groups demonstrated a high level of compliance with their assigned toothbrush. Overall, the results of this study demonstrated that sonic toothbrushing significantly reduced plaque, gingival inflammation and bleeding, and probing pocket depths around implants over the 6-month trial period. It is concluded that sonic brushing is an effective means of dental implant maintenance.",
author = "Larry Wolff and Alex Kim and Nunn, {Martha E.} and Bashar Bakdash and James Hinrichs",
year = "1998",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "821--828",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Periodontology",
issn = "0303-6979",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of a sonic toothbrush in maintenance of dental implants. A prospective study

AU - Wolff, Larry

AU - Kim, Alex

AU - Nunn, Martha E.

AU - Bakdash, Bashar

AU - Hinrichs, James

PY - 1998/10

Y1 - 1998/10

N2 - This study assessed the efficacy of a sonic and a manual toothbrush in reducing plaque and gingivitis around dental implants. Subjects were randomly assigned to either sonic (n=16) or manual (n=15) study groups. Groups were balanced according to baseline levels of plaque and gingivitis. The plaque (PI), gingival (GI), and bleeding (BI) indices as well as probing depths were determined at baseline, and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 week follow-up visits. Mean scores per person were calculated for each clinical parameter. Oral hygiene habits, compliance and acceptance were also evaluated over the study period. Within group comparisons from baseline throughout the study, as well as between group comparisons (i.e., sonic versus manual), were determined. Overall, plaque, gingival, and bleeding indices in both groups were lower at each follow-up visit when compared to the baseline. Within group comparisons demonstrated that both the sonic toothbrush subjects and the manual toothbrush subjects had significantly lower PI, GI, and BI scores at each post-baseline visit (4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks) than at baseline (p0.05). No implant problems (e.g., loose screws) were attributable to the sonic toothbrush. Relevant to oral hygiene habits, subjects in both groups demonstrated a high level of compliance with their assigned toothbrush. Overall, the results of this study demonstrated that sonic toothbrushing significantly reduced plaque, gingival inflammation and bleeding, and probing pocket depths around implants over the 6-month trial period. It is concluded that sonic brushing is an effective means of dental implant maintenance.

AB - This study assessed the efficacy of a sonic and a manual toothbrush in reducing plaque and gingivitis around dental implants. Subjects were randomly assigned to either sonic (n=16) or manual (n=15) study groups. Groups were balanced according to baseline levels of plaque and gingivitis. The plaque (PI), gingival (GI), and bleeding (BI) indices as well as probing depths were determined at baseline, and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 week follow-up visits. Mean scores per person were calculated for each clinical parameter. Oral hygiene habits, compliance and acceptance were also evaluated over the study period. Within group comparisons from baseline throughout the study, as well as between group comparisons (i.e., sonic versus manual), were determined. Overall, plaque, gingival, and bleeding indices in both groups were lower at each follow-up visit when compared to the baseline. Within group comparisons demonstrated that both the sonic toothbrush subjects and the manual toothbrush subjects had significantly lower PI, GI, and BI scores at each post-baseline visit (4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks) than at baseline (p0.05). No implant problems (e.g., loose screws) were attributable to the sonic toothbrush. Relevant to oral hygiene habits, subjects in both groups demonstrated a high level of compliance with their assigned toothbrush. Overall, the results of this study demonstrated that sonic toothbrushing significantly reduced plaque, gingival inflammation and bleeding, and probing pocket depths around implants over the 6-month trial period. It is concluded that sonic brushing is an effective means of dental implant maintenance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032186270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032186270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 821

EP - 828

JO - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

JF - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

SN - 0303-6979

IS - 10

ER -