Effects of highly structured versus nondirective group counseling approaches on personality and behavioral measures of adjustment in incarcerated felons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Compared the relative effectiveness of 2 methods of group counseling with incarcerated felons. 80 Ss were randomly assigned to either a new, highly structured method that used specific counseling exercises, a more traditional nondirective group method relatively low in structure, or a waiting-list control group. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated through the California Psychological Inventory and the Bipolar Psychological Inventory, MMPI, and behavioral measures of prison adjustment for 1 yr following treatment. Relative to the nondirective treatment condition, the highly structured approach produced significantly greater empathy, improved interpersonal functioning, and a reduction in frequency of serious rule violations. Contrary to expectations, there were no treatment-produced differences in self-esteem, self-disclosure, or frequency of total rule violations. (11 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)520-523
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Counseling Psychology
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1980
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Personality
Counseling
Self Disclosure
Psychology
Equipment and Supplies
MMPI
Waiting Lists
Prisons
Self Concept
Control Groups

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{1c3e653771d240d0ac0e7ccf54fe697c,
title = "Effects of highly structured versus nondirective group counseling approaches on personality and behavioral measures of adjustment in incarcerated felons",
abstract = "Compared the relative effectiveness of 2 methods of group counseling with incarcerated felons. 80 Ss were randomly assigned to either a new, highly structured method that used specific counseling exercises, a more traditional nondirective group method relatively low in structure, or a waiting-list control group. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated through the California Psychological Inventory and the Bipolar Psychological Inventory, MMPI, and behavioral measures of prison adjustment for 1 yr following treatment. Relative to the nondirective treatment condition, the highly structured approach produced significantly greater empathy, improved interpersonal functioning, and a reduction in frequency of serious rule violations. Contrary to expectations, there were no treatment-produced differences in self-esteem, self-disclosure, or frequency of total rule violations. (11 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
author = "Leak, {Gary K.}",
year = "1980",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1037/0022-0167.27.5.520",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "520--523",
journal = "Journal of Counseling Psychology",
issn = "0022-0167",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of highly structured versus nondirective group counseling approaches on personality and behavioral measures of adjustment in incarcerated felons

AU - Leak, Gary K.

PY - 1980/9

Y1 - 1980/9

N2 - Compared the relative effectiveness of 2 methods of group counseling with incarcerated felons. 80 Ss were randomly assigned to either a new, highly structured method that used specific counseling exercises, a more traditional nondirective group method relatively low in structure, or a waiting-list control group. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated through the California Psychological Inventory and the Bipolar Psychological Inventory, MMPI, and behavioral measures of prison adjustment for 1 yr following treatment. Relative to the nondirective treatment condition, the highly structured approach produced significantly greater empathy, improved interpersonal functioning, and a reduction in frequency of serious rule violations. Contrary to expectations, there were no treatment-produced differences in self-esteem, self-disclosure, or frequency of total rule violations. (11 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Compared the relative effectiveness of 2 methods of group counseling with incarcerated felons. 80 Ss were randomly assigned to either a new, highly structured method that used specific counseling exercises, a more traditional nondirective group method relatively low in structure, or a waiting-list control group. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated through the California Psychological Inventory and the Bipolar Psychological Inventory, MMPI, and behavioral measures of prison adjustment for 1 yr following treatment. Relative to the nondirective treatment condition, the highly structured approach produced significantly greater empathy, improved interpersonal functioning, and a reduction in frequency of serious rule violations. Contrary to expectations, there were no treatment-produced differences in self-esteem, self-disclosure, or frequency of total rule violations. (11 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001491302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001491302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-0167.27.5.520

DO - 10.1037/0022-0167.27.5.520

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 520

EP - 523

JO - Journal of Counseling Psychology

JF - Journal of Counseling Psychology

SN - 0022-0167

IS - 5

ER -