Effects of highly structured versus nondirective group counseling approaches on personality and behavioral measures of adjustment in incarcerated felons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Compared the relative effectiveness of 2 methods of group counseling with incarcerated felons. 80 Ss were randomly assigned to either a new, highly structured method that used specific counseling exercises, a more traditional nondirective group method relatively low in structure, or a waiting-list control group. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated through the California Psychological Inventory and the Bipolar Psychological Inventory, MMPI, and behavioral measures of prison adjustment for 1 yr following treatment. Relative to the nondirective treatment condition, the highly structured approach produced significantly greater empathy, improved interpersonal functioning, and a reduction in frequency of serious rule violations. Contrary to expectations, there were no treatment-produced differences in self-esteem, self-disclosure, or frequency of total rule violations. (11 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)520-523
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Counseling Psychology
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1980

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of highly structured versus nondirective group counseling approaches on personality and behavioral measures of adjustment in incarcerated felons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this