Electoral mandate and party cohesion: Does it matter in Lithuania?

Terry D. Clark; Žilvinas Martinaitis; Ramunas Dilba

doi:10.1080/13523270802267864

Electoral mandate and party cohesion: Does it matter in Lithuania?

Terry D. Clark, Žilvinas Martinaitis, Ramunas Dilba

Department of Political Science and International Relations

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Legislators elected on a party list vote (proportional representation system) are ostensibly more disciplined than those elected in single-seat district contests. However, previous efforts to test this hypothesis in cross-national studies have led to ambiguous results, as contextual factors were found to be at least as important as the type of mandate. In the case of Lithuania, which has adopted a mixed electoral system, the behaviour of elected deputies in 962 roll-call votes between 2003 and 2006 reveals that deputies from single-seat constituencies, rather than deputies on party lists, are more disciplined in the Lithuanian Seimas. This unexpected finding may be related to the peculiar dynamics of mixed electoral systems.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	317-337
Number of pages	21
Journal	Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics
Volume	24
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270802267864
State	Published - Sep 1 2008

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Geography, Planning and Development
Development
Political Science and International Relations

Access to Document

10.1080/13523270802267864

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Electoral mandate and party cohesion: Does it matter in Lithuania?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{47eefbd2168f4ec8b4343bb0d995c499,

title = "Electoral mandate and party cohesion: Does it matter in Lithuania?",

abstract = "Legislators elected on a party list vote (proportional representation system) are ostensibly more disciplined than those elected in single-seat district contests. However, previous efforts to test this hypothesis in cross-national studies have led to ambiguous results, as contextual factors were found to be at least as important as the type of mandate. In the case of Lithuania, which has adopted a mixed electoral system, the behaviour of elected deputies in 962 roll-call votes between 2003 and 2006 reveals that deputies from single-seat constituencies, rather than deputies on party lists, are more disciplined in the Lithuanian Seimas. This unexpected finding may be related to the peculiar dynamics of mixed electoral systems.",

author = "Clark, {Terry D.} and {\v Z}ilvinas Martinaitis and Ramunas Dilba",

year = "2008",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1080/13523270802267864",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "24",

pages = "317--337",

journal = "Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics",

issn = "1352-3279",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electoral mandate and party cohesion

T2 - Does it matter in Lithuania?

AU - Clark, Terry D.

AU - Martinaitis, Žilvinas

AU - Dilba, Ramunas

PY - 2008/9/1

Y1 - 2008/9/1

N2 - Legislators elected on a party list vote (proportional representation system) are ostensibly more disciplined than those elected in single-seat district contests. However, previous efforts to test this hypothesis in cross-national studies have led to ambiguous results, as contextual factors were found to be at least as important as the type of mandate. In the case of Lithuania, which has adopted a mixed electoral system, the behaviour of elected deputies in 962 roll-call votes between 2003 and 2006 reveals that deputies from single-seat constituencies, rather than deputies on party lists, are more disciplined in the Lithuanian Seimas. This unexpected finding may be related to the peculiar dynamics of mixed electoral systems.

AB - Legislators elected on a party list vote (proportional representation system) are ostensibly more disciplined than those elected in single-seat district contests. However, previous efforts to test this hypothesis in cross-national studies have led to ambiguous results, as contextual factors were found to be at least as important as the type of mandate. In the case of Lithuania, which has adopted a mixed electoral system, the behaviour of elected deputies in 962 roll-call votes between 2003 and 2006 reveals that deputies from single-seat constituencies, rather than deputies on party lists, are more disciplined in the Lithuanian Seimas. This unexpected finding may be related to the peculiar dynamics of mixed electoral systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50249113812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50249113812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13523270802267864

DO - 10.1080/13523270802267864

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:50249113812

VL - 24

SP - 317

EP - 337

JO - Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics

JF - Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics

SN - 1352-3279

IS - 3

ER -

Electoral mandate and party cohesion: Does it matter in Lithuania?

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this