Embedded Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal: Use of Endobronchial Forceps

S. William Stavropoulos, Robert G. Dixon, Charles T. Burke, Joseph Stavas, Anand Shah, Richard D. Shlansky-Goldberg, Scott O. Trerotola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Removing a retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter can be extremely difficult with the use of standard techniques if the filter is tilted and embedded in the wall of the IVC. The use of rigid endobronchial forceps has been described in case reports to remove embedded IVC filters, and the present report describes the use of this technique to remove a series of tip-embedded IVC filters in two separate institutions. Materials and Methods: The medical records were reviewed of 21 consecutive patients at two institutions who underwent attempted IVC filter removal with rigid endobronchial forceps over a 34-month period. The mean age of patients was 32.4 years (range, 14.1-54.1 y). The patients had the following filters: Recovery (n = 6), G2 (n = 10), Günther Tulip (n = 4), and OptEase (n = 1). Results: Rotational or biplane venography was used to confirm that the filters were tilted and embedded in the wall of the IVC in all 21 patients. Rigid endobronchial forceps were used successfully to remove 20 embedded IVC filters in 21 patients. There was one case of failure to remove an embedded suprarenal G2 filter. There were no major complications. Conclusions: Rigid endobronchial forceps may be used as a reliable option for removal of embedded IVC filters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1297-1301
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume19
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vena Cava Filters
Surgical Instruments
Inferior Vena Cava
Tulipa
Phlebography
Medical Records

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Stavropoulos, S. W., Dixon, R. G., Burke, C. T., Stavas, J., Shah, A., Shlansky-Goldberg, R. D., & Trerotola, S. O. (2008). Embedded Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal: Use of Endobronchial Forceps. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 19(9), 1297-1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2008.04.012

Embedded Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal : Use of Endobronchial Forceps. / Stavropoulos, S. William; Dixon, Robert G.; Burke, Charles T.; Stavas, Joseph; Shah, Anand; Shlansky-Goldberg, Richard D.; Trerotola, Scott O.

In: Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 19, No. 9, 09.2008, p. 1297-1301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stavropoulos, SW, Dixon, RG, Burke, CT, Stavas, J, Shah, A, Shlansky-Goldberg, RD & Trerotola, SO 2008, 'Embedded Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal: Use of Endobronchial Forceps', Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1297-1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2008.04.012
Stavropoulos, S. William ; Dixon, Robert G. ; Burke, Charles T. ; Stavas, Joseph ; Shah, Anand ; Shlansky-Goldberg, Richard D. ; Trerotola, Scott O. / Embedded Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal : Use of Endobronchial Forceps. In: Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2008 ; Vol. 19, No. 9. pp. 1297-1301.
@article{fa8c5940a34e4701b8151548599fccdb,
title = "Embedded Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal: Use of Endobronchial Forceps",
abstract = "Purpose: Removing a retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter can be extremely difficult with the use of standard techniques if the filter is tilted and embedded in the wall of the IVC. The use of rigid endobronchial forceps has been described in case reports to remove embedded IVC filters, and the present report describes the use of this technique to remove a series of tip-embedded IVC filters in two separate institutions. Materials and Methods: The medical records were reviewed of 21 consecutive patients at two institutions who underwent attempted IVC filter removal with rigid endobronchial forceps over a 34-month period. The mean age of patients was 32.4 years (range, 14.1-54.1 y). The patients had the following filters: Recovery (n = 6), G2 (n = 10), G{\"u}nther Tulip (n = 4), and OptEase (n = 1). Results: Rotational or biplane venography was used to confirm that the filters were tilted and embedded in the wall of the IVC in all 21 patients. Rigid endobronchial forceps were used successfully to remove 20 embedded IVC filters in 21 patients. There was one case of failure to remove an embedded suprarenal G2 filter. There were no major complications. Conclusions: Rigid endobronchial forceps may be used as a reliable option for removal of embedded IVC filters.",
author = "Stavropoulos, {S. William} and Dixon, {Robert G.} and Burke, {Charles T.} and Joseph Stavas and Anand Shah and Shlansky-Goldberg, {Richard D.} and Trerotola, {Scott O.}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvir.2008.04.012",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1297--1301",
journal = "Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology",
issn = "1051-0443",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embedded Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removal

T2 - Use of Endobronchial Forceps

AU - Stavropoulos, S. William

AU - Dixon, Robert G.

AU - Burke, Charles T.

AU - Stavas, Joseph

AU - Shah, Anand

AU - Shlansky-Goldberg, Richard D.

AU - Trerotola, Scott O.

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - Purpose: Removing a retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter can be extremely difficult with the use of standard techniques if the filter is tilted and embedded in the wall of the IVC. The use of rigid endobronchial forceps has been described in case reports to remove embedded IVC filters, and the present report describes the use of this technique to remove a series of tip-embedded IVC filters in two separate institutions. Materials and Methods: The medical records were reviewed of 21 consecutive patients at two institutions who underwent attempted IVC filter removal with rigid endobronchial forceps over a 34-month period. The mean age of patients was 32.4 years (range, 14.1-54.1 y). The patients had the following filters: Recovery (n = 6), G2 (n = 10), Günther Tulip (n = 4), and OptEase (n = 1). Results: Rotational or biplane venography was used to confirm that the filters were tilted and embedded in the wall of the IVC in all 21 patients. Rigid endobronchial forceps were used successfully to remove 20 embedded IVC filters in 21 patients. There was one case of failure to remove an embedded suprarenal G2 filter. There were no major complications. Conclusions: Rigid endobronchial forceps may be used as a reliable option for removal of embedded IVC filters.

AB - Purpose: Removing a retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter can be extremely difficult with the use of standard techniques if the filter is tilted and embedded in the wall of the IVC. The use of rigid endobronchial forceps has been described in case reports to remove embedded IVC filters, and the present report describes the use of this technique to remove a series of tip-embedded IVC filters in two separate institutions. Materials and Methods: The medical records were reviewed of 21 consecutive patients at two institutions who underwent attempted IVC filter removal with rigid endobronchial forceps over a 34-month period. The mean age of patients was 32.4 years (range, 14.1-54.1 y). The patients had the following filters: Recovery (n = 6), G2 (n = 10), Günther Tulip (n = 4), and OptEase (n = 1). Results: Rotational or biplane venography was used to confirm that the filters were tilted and embedded in the wall of the IVC in all 21 patients. Rigid endobronchial forceps were used successfully to remove 20 embedded IVC filters in 21 patients. There was one case of failure to remove an embedded suprarenal G2 filter. There were no major complications. Conclusions: Rigid endobronchial forceps may be used as a reliable option for removal of embedded IVC filters.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49749098880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49749098880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.04.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.04.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 18725092

AN - SCOPUS:49749098880

VL - 19

SP - 1297

EP - 1301

JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

SN - 1051-0443

IS - 9

ER -