Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: Determinants of sampling adequacy

Zachary S. DePew; Eric S. Edell; David E. Midthun; John J. Mullon; Aaron O. Bungum; Paul A. Decker; Fabien Maldonado

doi:10.1097/LBR.0b013e31826e361c

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: Determinants of sampling adequacy

Zachary S. DePew, Eric S. Edell, David E. Midthun, John J. Mullon, Aaron O. Bungum, Paul A. Decker, Fabien Maldonado

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is increasingly used to sample mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes and has excellent diagnostic test characteristics. The determinants of sampling adequacy, however, have not been extensively examined. We set out to determine which procedural variables were associated with acquisition of tissue sufficient for pathologic analysis during EBUS-TBNA. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all EBUS-TBNA cases performed over 32 months by 10 proceduralists at our institution was completed. Variables potentially associated with sampling adequacy were analyzed. Results: A total of 1304 procedures performed by 10 proceduralists while the patient received conscious sedation were included for analysis. Sampling adequacy was 94.2% overall and varied with the primary proceduralist (87% to 99.2%; P

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	271-276
Number of pages	6
Journal	Journal of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology
Volume	19
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0b013e31826e361c
State	Published - Oct 1 2012
Externally published	Yes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Access to Document

10.1097/LBR.0b013e31826e361c

Cite this

@article{c37c75ab0d5846e2aa118f8ea0665ae1,

title = "Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: Determinants of sampling adequacy",

abstract = "Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is increasingly used to sample mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes and has excellent diagnostic test characteristics. The determinants of sampling adequacy, however, have not been extensively examined. We set out to determine which procedural variables were associated with acquisition of tissue sufficient for pathologic analysis during EBUS-TBNA. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all EBUS-TBNA cases performed over 32 months by 10 proceduralists at our institution was completed. Variables potentially associated with sampling adequacy were analyzed. Results: A total of 1304 procedures performed by 10 proceduralists while the patient received conscious sedation were included for analysis. Sampling adequacy was 94.2% overall and varied with the primary proceduralist (87% to 99.2%; P",

author = "DePew, {Zachary S.} and Edell, {Eric S.} and Midthun, {David E.} and Mullon, {John J.} and Bungum, {Aaron O.} and Decker, {Paul A.} and Fabien Maldonado",

year = "2012",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1097/LBR.0b013e31826e361c",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "19",

pages = "271--276",

journal = "Journal of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology",

issn = "1944-6586",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration

T2 - Determinants of sampling adequacy

AU - DePew, Zachary S.

AU - Edell, Eric S.

AU - Midthun, David E.

AU - Mullon, John J.

AU - Bungum, Aaron O.

AU - Decker, Paul A.

AU - Maldonado, Fabien

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is increasingly used to sample mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes and has excellent diagnostic test characteristics. The determinants of sampling adequacy, however, have not been extensively examined. We set out to determine which procedural variables were associated with acquisition of tissue sufficient for pathologic analysis during EBUS-TBNA. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all EBUS-TBNA cases performed over 32 months by 10 proceduralists at our institution was completed. Variables potentially associated with sampling adequacy were analyzed. Results: A total of 1304 procedures performed by 10 proceduralists while the patient received conscious sedation were included for analysis. Sampling adequacy was 94.2% overall and varied with the primary proceduralist (87% to 99.2%; P

AB - Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is increasingly used to sample mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes and has excellent diagnostic test characteristics. The determinants of sampling adequacy, however, have not been extensively examined. We set out to determine which procedural variables were associated with acquisition of tissue sufficient for pathologic analysis during EBUS-TBNA. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all EBUS-TBNA cases performed over 32 months by 10 proceduralists at our institution was completed. Variables potentially associated with sampling adequacy were analyzed. Results: A total of 1304 procedures performed by 10 proceduralists while the patient received conscious sedation were included for analysis. Sampling adequacy was 94.2% overall and varied with the primary proceduralist (87% to 99.2%; P

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871254869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871254869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/LBR.0b013e31826e361c

DO - 10.1097/LBR.0b013e31826e361c

M3 - Article

C2 - 23207525

AN - SCOPUS:84871254869

VL - 19

SP - 271

EP - 276

JO - Journal of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology

JF - Journal of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology

SN - 1944-6586

IS - 4

ER -

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: Determinants of sampling adequacy

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this